Driving anger expression in Germany—Validation of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory for German drivers

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

Objective: The main objective of this article is to examine whether the Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX) applies to German drivers because this scale has previously been given to drivers in many different countries. Methods: We applied German versions of the DAX, the Driving Anger Scale (DAS), and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) to a sample of 501 German drivers. We computed confirmatory factor analysis and principal axis factoring (PAF) analysis to examine the structure of driving anger expression in Germany. Finally, we related the drivers’ anger exp ression scores to their driving anger experiences and their general anger propensities to assess the validity of the DAX for German drivers. Results: Results indicated that the DAX’s original factor structure does not apply to German drivers because the confirmatory factor analysis did not show a good model fit. An item analysis revealed that many DAX items had no meaningful variability. They were excluded from further analysis. The subsequent PAF analysis indicated that German drivers do not use personal physical aggression to express their driving anger. Instead, they reported unique preventive anger expression management behavior. In addition, their driving anger expressions were significantly related to their driving anger experiences and their general anger propensities indicated the validity of the refined DAX for German drivers. Conclusions: We conclude that German drivers do not use strong behaviors to express their driving anger. Many statements of Deffenbacher et al.’s (Behav Res Ther. 40:717–737, 2002) original American questionnaire were not applicable for our sample of German drivers. These findings are in line with several other studies showing discrepancies in driving anger expression in various countries. Future investigations should examine the reasons for discrepancies in driving anger expression.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTraffic Injury Prevention
Volume20
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)52-57
Number of pages6
ISSN1538-9588
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09.03.2019

    Research areas

  • Driving anger expression, Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX), emotions in driving, personality and driving
  • Business psychology

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Two cascaded and extended kalman filters combined with sliding mode control for sustainable management of marine fish stocks
  2. Circular Business Models: OVercoming Barriers, Unleashing Potentials
  3. The "German Case"
  4. Reallabor versus Realexperiment
  5. Plant-plant interactions, biodiversity & assembly in grasslands and their relevance to restoration
  6. Vielfältige Partizipation oder Repräsentation von Vielfalt in der Occupy-Bewegung?
  7. International scaling of sustainability continuing professional development for in-service teachers
  8. Kann man Wald ernten?
  9. Effective democracy, mass culture, and the quality of elites
  10. Medienerziehung in der Kindertagesstätte
  11. Exemplarisch lernen an der "Lüneburger Heide"
  12. MindMatters - A programme for the promotion of mental health in primary and secondary schools
  13. Determination of phosphorus in phosphorylated deoxyribonucleotides using capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with an octopole reaction cell
  14. Solution heat treatment on mechanical properties and corrosion of extruded Mg5Gd compared to pure Mg
  15. Exploring the Corporate Reality of Sustainability Accounting Practice
  16. Self-Wiring Question Answering Systems
  17. How test takers see test examiners
  18. UN Global Action Programme and Education for Sustainable Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence Base
  19. Organizational Practice Transfer within a Transnational Professional Service Firm
  20. Carnivores’ contributions to people in Europe
  21. Formen des Kontakts