Do we fail to exert self-control because we lack resources or motivation? Competing theories to explain a debated phenomenon
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 62, No. 2, 04.2023, p. 782-805.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Do we fail to exert self-control because we lack resources or motivation? Competing theories to explain a debated phenomenon
AU - Troll, Eve Sarah
AU - Friese, Malte
AU - Loschelder, David D.
N1 - Funding Information: The present research was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG FR 3605/2‐1). We are very grateful to Constantin Tiberius Toth for his great help in programming the present study using the Gorilla software. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Exerting effort in a first task can impair self-control performance in a subsequent task. Hundreds of studies have examined this ego depletion effect, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. By contrasting the two most prominent models, the strength model and the process model, the following question takes centre stage: Do participants fail to exert self-control because they run short of an unspecified resource or because they lack the motivation to engage in the subsequent task? We contrasted competing predictions (N = 560) from these two models by manipulating monetary incentives to be donated to charity in the first of two tasks. We found evidence of the standard ego depletion effect—self-control performance was impaired after a high- versus a low-demand task in the no-incentive conditions. Incentives had an unexpected effect: Whereas participants in the incentive conditions showed higher intrinsic, autonomous motivation, they did not exert greater effort. This unexpected finding limited the applicability of our registered predictions; thus, we opted to test updated predictions. We discuss the theoretical implications of our understanding of the processes underlying ego depletion effects and their meaning for the ongoing debate about replicability and robustness.
AB - Exerting effort in a first task can impair self-control performance in a subsequent task. Hundreds of studies have examined this ego depletion effect, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. By contrasting the two most prominent models, the strength model and the process model, the following question takes centre stage: Do participants fail to exert self-control because they run short of an unspecified resource or because they lack the motivation to engage in the subsequent task? We contrasted competing predictions (N = 560) from these two models by manipulating monetary incentives to be donated to charity in the first of two tasks. We found evidence of the standard ego depletion effect—self-control performance was impaired after a high- versus a low-demand task in the no-incentive conditions. Incentives had an unexpected effect: Whereas participants in the incentive conditions showed higher intrinsic, autonomous motivation, they did not exert greater effort. This unexpected finding limited the applicability of our registered predictions; thus, we opted to test updated predictions. We discuss the theoretical implications of our understanding of the processes underlying ego depletion effects and their meaning for the ongoing debate about replicability and robustness.
KW - ego depletion
KW - mental effort
KW - monetary incentives
KW - process model
KW - self-control failure
KW - strength model
KW - Psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141381666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1b6a1c41-b48d-301a-9625-894a87d6f632/
U2 - 10.1111/bjso.12594
DO - 10.1111/bjso.12594
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 36329599
AN - SCOPUS:85141381666
VL - 62
SP - 782
EP - 805
JO - British Journal of Social Psychology
JF - British Journal of Social Psychology
SN - 2044-8309
IS - 2
ER -