Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The discourse revolving around “new modes of knowledge production”—particularly in sustainability-oriented research—seems to suggest a duality of transdisciplinary versus non-transdisciplinary research. Yet, in reality, a spectrum of transdisciplinary research modes may be expected. This article offers an empirically grounded distinction of five research modes, based on a cluster analysis of 59 completed sustainability-oriented research projects. Projects in one cluster approximate a transdisciplinary ideal type, while another cluster combines almost purely practice-oriented projects. Among the three remaining clusters with varying degrees of practitioner interaction, one cluster assembles projects with strictly academic research, while realizing substantial societal impact. Furthermore, our analyses indicate that the choice of research mode strongly depends on the funding context, with mission-oriented funding encouraging more collaborative modes. Overall, clusters with more practitioner interaction display stronger societal outputs and impacts at the cost of academic outputs and impacts. Beyond the demarcation of transdisciplinary research modes in sustainability science, our empirical analysis revealed three important tensions related to the theory and practice of this research approach: the duality of science and society (and scholars and practitioners); imbalances in the involvement and influence of different societal actor groups; and tensions between societal and academic outputs and impacts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSustainable Development
Volume30
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)343-357
Number of pages15
ISSN0968-0802
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.04.2022

Bibliographical note

The authors would like to thank the members of our advisory group, Antonietta di Giulio, Rico Defila, Michael Pregernig, Arnim Wiek and Michael Stauffacher, for their constructive and valuable feedback in early stages of this research; Nicolas W. Jager for reviewing the clustering procedure; the German Research Foundation for providing the funding for the research project Modes of sustainability‐related research in comparison (MONA): Modes of research and their impact on scientific and societal project outcomes under grant numbers NE1207/4‐1 to Jens Newig and LA3024/1‐1 to Daniel J. Lang; staff from the German Research Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support in preparing the data collection; project heads, researchers and practitioners involved in the investigated sustainability‐oriented research projects for providing us with project documents, as well as for participating in a survey and semi‐structured interviews; our student assistants Marie Josefine Hintz, Marie Weiß, Marion Blome, Sophia Schönig, Maria Brück, Silke Bölts, Alina Langkau, Franziska Steinbrügge, Jakob Wondra and Inga Melchior for their long‐term and outstanding support with regard to data collection and data editing in preparation for this article.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Developing ESD-specific professional action competence for teachers: knowledge, skills, and attitudes in implementing ESD at the school level
  2. Optimal scheduling for Automated Guided Vehicles (AGV) in blocking job-shops
  3. Systematic learning in water governance: insights from five local adaptive management projects for water quality innovation
  4. Health and the intention to retire: exploring the moderating effects of human resources practices
  5. Integrating a piezoelectric actuator with mechanical and hydraulic devices to control camless engines
  6. Tree species identity, canopy structure and prey availability differentially affect canopy spider diversity and trophic composition
  7. Modeling of microstructural pattern formation in crystal plasticity
  8. Special Issue: A variational pragmatic approach to regional variation in language: Celebrating the work of Klaus P. Schneider
  9. Managing information in the case of opinion spamming
  10. Leading Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in Schools
  11. Random year intercepts in mixed models help to assess uncertainties in insect population trends
  12. A Study on the Impact of Intradomain Finetuning of Deep Language Models for Legal Named Entity Recognition in Portuguese
  13. Categorizing urban tasks
  14. From theory to experience
  15. Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises
  16. Dynamische Mathematik
  17. Performance of the Chemcatcher ® passive sampler when used to monitor 10 polar and semi-polar pesticides in 16 Central European streams, and comparison with two other sampling methods
  18. Functions of Constitutions
  19. Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests
  20. External State-Building and Why Norms Matter
  21. rSOESGOPE Method Applied to Four-Tank System Modeling
  22. Do Linguistic Features Influence Item Difficulty in Physics Assessments?
  23. History of Embryology: Visualizations Through Series and Animation
  24. Responsibility and environment
  25. Using the learner-generated drawing strategy
  26. Development and characterisation of a new interface for coupling capillary LC with collision-cell ICPMS and its application for phosphorylation profiling of tryptic protein digests
  27. Clashing Values
  28. Stabilisierung durch Implementieren, Sichern und Evaluieren
  29. Choice and quantity demand for improved and unimproved public water sources in rural areas
  30. Negotiation complexity