Welche bildungswissenschaftlichen inhalte sind wichtig in der lehrerbildung? Ergebnisse einer delphi-studie
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Standard
in: Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Jahrgang 15, Nr. 4, 12.2012, S. 649-682.
Publikation: Beiträge in Zeitschriften › Übersichtsarbeiten › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Welche bildungswissenschaftlichen inhalte sind wichtig in der lehrerbildung? Ergebnisse einer delphi-studie
AU - Kunina-Habenicht, Olga
AU - Lohse-Bossenz, Hendrik
AU - Kunter, Mareike
AU - Dicke, Theresa
AU - Förster, Doris
AU - Gößling, Jill
AU - Schulze-Stocker, Franziska
AU - Schmeck, Annett
AU - Baumert, Jürgen
AU - Leutner, Detlev
AU - Terhart, Ewald
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - In reviews of university teacher training, those parts of the curriculum that are based on educational science have often been criticized for teaching theoretical knowledge that is perceived as practically irrelevant and non-cumulative. while the importance of the professional knowledge base per se is uncontested, it is less clear which educational topics such a knowledge base should include. this paper describes a Delphi study that aims to develop the taxonomy of core educational topics that should be taught in university teacher education. the Delphi study consisted of three consecutive rounds involving 49 experts of various professional backgrounds completing a standardized questionnaire. In the first round experts rated the relative importance of 213 topics from various aspects of the teaching profession. In order to reduce the number of relevant topics in the second and third round, experts had to choose a range of topics to be taught at university within a given time and a range of topics relevant for practical application. the results of the Delphi study show that the presented canon of topics was exhaustive and that experts from various disciplines involved in German teacher education share an understanding of topics relevant to the training of prospective teachers.
AB - In reviews of university teacher training, those parts of the curriculum that are based on educational science have often been criticized for teaching theoretical knowledge that is perceived as practically irrelevant and non-cumulative. while the importance of the professional knowledge base per se is uncontested, it is less clear which educational topics such a knowledge base should include. this paper describes a Delphi study that aims to develop the taxonomy of core educational topics that should be taught in university teacher education. the Delphi study consisted of three consecutive rounds involving 49 experts of various professional backgrounds completing a standardized questionnaire. In the first round experts rated the relative importance of 213 topics from various aspects of the teaching profession. In order to reduce the number of relevant topics in the second and third round, experts had to choose a range of topics to be taught at university within a given time and a range of topics relevant for practical application. the results of the Delphi study show that the presented canon of topics was exhaustive and that experts from various disciplines involved in German teacher education share an understanding of topics relevant to the training of prospective teachers.
KW - Delphi study
KW - Educational science
KW - Expert survey
KW - Teacher education
KW - Teacher training
KW - Psychologie
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892372193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11618-012-0324-6
DO - 10.1007/s11618-012-0324-6
M3 - Übersichtsarbeiten
AN - SCOPUS:84892372193
VL - 15
SP - 649
EP - 682
JO - Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
JF - Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
SN - 1434-663X
IS - 4
ER -