Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. / Korbach, Andreas; Ginns, Paul; Brünken, Roland et al.
in: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 1, 01.02.2020, S. 102-113.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Korbach A, Ginns P, Brünken R, Park B. Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2020 Feb 1;36(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12396

Bibtex

@article{df2ec4213de94ca7b7f9f149808c9481,
title = "Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study",
abstract = "Given the widespread use of touch screen devices, the effect of the users' fingers on information processing and learning is of growing interest. The present study drew on cognitive load theory and embodied cognition perspectives to investigate the effects of pointing and tracing gestures on the surface of a multimedia learning instruction. Learning performance, cognitive load and visual attention were examined in a one-factorial experimental design with the between-subject factor pointing and tracing gestures. The pointing and tracing group were instructed to use their fingers during the learning phase to make connections between corresponding text and picture information, whereas the control group was instructed not to use their hands for learning. The results showed a beneficial effect of pointing and tracing gestures on learning performance, a significant shift in visual attention and deeper processing of information by the pointing and tracing group, but no effect on subjective ratings of cognitive load. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.",
keywords = "cognitive load theory, embodied cognition, eye-tracking, tracing gestures, Empirical education research, Educational science",
author = "Andreas Korbach and Paul Ginns and Roland Br{\"u}nken and Babette Park",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01PL12057). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jcal.12396",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "102--113",
journal = "Journal of Computer Assisted Learning",
issn = "0266-4909",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study

AU - Korbach, Andreas

AU - Ginns, Paul

AU - Brünken, Roland

AU - Park, Babette

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01PL12057). Publisher Copyright: © 2020, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Given the widespread use of touch screen devices, the effect of the users' fingers on information processing and learning is of growing interest. The present study drew on cognitive load theory and embodied cognition perspectives to investigate the effects of pointing and tracing gestures on the surface of a multimedia learning instruction. Learning performance, cognitive load and visual attention were examined in a one-factorial experimental design with the between-subject factor pointing and tracing gestures. The pointing and tracing group were instructed to use their fingers during the learning phase to make connections between corresponding text and picture information, whereas the control group was instructed not to use their hands for learning. The results showed a beneficial effect of pointing and tracing gestures on learning performance, a significant shift in visual attention and deeper processing of information by the pointing and tracing group, but no effect on subjective ratings of cognitive load. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

AB - Given the widespread use of touch screen devices, the effect of the users' fingers on information processing and learning is of growing interest. The present study drew on cognitive load theory and embodied cognition perspectives to investigate the effects of pointing and tracing gestures on the surface of a multimedia learning instruction. Learning performance, cognitive load and visual attention were examined in a one-factorial experimental design with the between-subject factor pointing and tracing gestures. The pointing and tracing group were instructed to use their fingers during the learning phase to make connections between corresponding text and picture information, whereas the control group was instructed not to use their hands for learning. The results showed a beneficial effect of pointing and tracing gestures on learning performance, a significant shift in visual attention and deeper processing of information by the pointing and tracing group, but no effect on subjective ratings of cognitive load. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

KW - cognitive load theory

KW - embodied cognition

KW - eye-tracking

KW - tracing gestures

KW - Empirical education research

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074816116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jcal.12396

DO - 10.1111/jcal.12396

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85074816116

VL - 36

SP - 102

EP - 113

JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

SN - 0266-4909

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Knowledge integration
  2. Enhanced Calculation Procedures for Material and Energy Flow Oriented EMIS
  3. Modellieren in der Sekundarstufe
  4. Unveiling local knowledge
  5. Master of Disaster: A Disaster-Related Event Monitoring System From News Streams
  6. Understanding the error-structure of Time-driven Activity-based Costing
  7. A luenberger observer for a quasi-static disturbance estimation in linear time invariant systems
  8. Automated scoring in the era of artificial intelligence
  9. Integration durch soziale Kontrolle?
  10. Intraindividual variability in identity centrality
  11. Geometric structures using model predictive control for an electromagnetic actuator
  12. Relationships between language-related variations in text tasks, reading comprehension, and students’ motivation and emotions: A systematic review
  13. Petri net based EMIS-mappers for flexible manufacturing systems
  14. Guest Editors' Introduction
  15. Finite element modeling of laser beam welding for residual stress calculation
  16. Introduction to ‘Exploring the frontiers: unveiling new horizons in carbon efficient biomass utilization’
  17. Media coverage of discourse on adaptation
  18. Reliability and Validity of Assessing User Satisfaction With Web-Based Health Interventions
  19. Developing a Complex Portrait of Content Teaching for Multilingual Learners via Nonlinear Theoretical Understandings
  20. Challenges for postdocs in Germany and beyond:
  21. Supporting Visual and Verbal Learning Preferences in a Second-Language Multimedia Learning Environment
  22. Writing as a Deeper Form of Concentration
  23. Multilingual disambiguation of named entities using linked data
  24. A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping
  25. Portuguese part-of-speech tagging with large margin structure learning
  26. AUC Maximizing Support Vector Learning
  27. Analysis of the construction of an autonomous robot to improve its energy efficiency when traveling through irregular terrain
  28. Artificial intelligence in songwriting and composing - perspectives and challenges in creative practices
  29. How to support teachers to give feedback to modelling tasks effectively? Results from a teacher-training-study in the Co²CA project
  30. Sliding Mode Control of an Inductive Power Transmission System with Maximum Efficiency