Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading. / Schaltegger, Stefan; Thomas, Tom.
in: Ecological Economics, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 1, 01.10.1996, S. 35-53.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schaltegger S, Thomas T. Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading. Ecological Economics. 1996 Okt 1;19(1):35-53. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

Bibtex

@article{34841dbff2cd4dffbe242da7734ba54e,
title = "Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading",
abstract = "To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced {\textquoteleft}incentive-based{\textquoteright} programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Stefan Schaltegger and Tom Thomas",
note = "Funding Information: S.S. is exceedingly thankful for the generous support from the Swiss National Science Foundation. We are very grateful to Herman E. Daly, Ren~ L. Frey, Ana Roque de Oliveira, Rob Smith and Tom Tietenberg who helped us to improve the text with their excellent and helpful comments. The authors would also like to acknowledge the diligent research assistance of James Atkinson and Melissa Schilling. The usual disclaimer applies of course.",
year = "1996",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "35--53",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT)

T2 - New Dimensions in Emissions Trading

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Thomas, Tom

N1 - Funding Information: S.S. is exceedingly thankful for the generous support from the Swiss National Science Foundation. We are very grateful to Herman E. Daly, Ren~ L. Frey, Ana Roque de Oliveira, Rob Smith and Tom Tietenberg who helped us to improve the text with their excellent and helpful comments. The authors would also like to acknowledge the diligent research assistance of James Atkinson and Melissa Schilling. The usual disclaimer applies of course.

PY - 1996/10/1

Y1 - 1996/10/1

N2 - To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced ‘incentive-based’ programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.

AB - To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced ‘incentive-based’ programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030251219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

DO - 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 19

SP - 35

EP - 53

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

IS - 1

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Nicolas Mendoza

Publikationen

  1. "Sicherung der Tarifautonomie durch gesetzliche Verpflichtung zur Tarifeinheit?" - die Position von ver.di
  2. Weidelandschaften und Wildnisgebiete
  3. Editorial zum Schwerpunktthema "Medien statt Gedächtnis"
  4. Die Produktion gefährlicher Räume
  5. Information Literacy - Pseudowissenschaft und digitale (Des-)Informataion bei den Themen 'Klimawandel', 'Clean Coal' und 'Stickoxidgrenzwerte'
  6. Tarifliche Regelungen befristeter Arbeitsverhältnisse
  7. Ein "altliberaler" Denker? Helmut Schelsky zwischen Sachlichkeit und Demokratie
  8. Nach Bali
  9. Ökologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen
  10. Engaging Teacher Educators with the Sustainability Agenda
  11. Zeit. Von der Urzeit zur Computerzeit / Klaus Mainzer. - 1995
  12. Quo vadis Maßgeblichkeit?
  13. Geschlechtergerecht studieren können
  14. Ein unmöglicher Blick von außen
  15. Herausfordernde Einmaleinsaufgaben - schon im zweiten Schuljahr
  16. Ausspracheprobleme weißrussischer Deutschlernender und Schritte zur korrekten Aussprache
  17. Upsides and downsides of the sharing economy
  18. Organisational aspects of public engagement in European energy infrastructure planning
  19. Hafenzugang für Kreuzfahrtschiffe in der COVID-19 Pandemie: Eine völkerrechtliche Perspektive
  20. Entrepreneurial orientation
  21. Rezension zu Rechter, Yvonne: Bedeutung individueller Lernförderung als Unterstützung schulischen Lernens
  22. Gesundheitsmonitoring und Gesundheitsmanagement an Hochschulen
  23. Bilanzielle Kapitalerhaltung in der EU vor einer Neuausrichtung?
  24. Lingua musica? Zur Erfassung musiksprachlicher Kompetenzen Jugendlicher in textbasierten Testinstrumenten.
  25. Geschichten und Geschichte
  26. Anthropologie und Kritik. Kant, Foucault und die philosophische Anthropologie
  27. Hot tearing susceptibility of Mg-5Nd-xZn alloys
  28. Qualitätssteigerung durch duale Beratung in der Schule?
  29. Langeweile Aushalten
  30. Schule - der Zukunft voraus
  31. § 3 Grundlagen des Internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts
  32. The tattooings of cities
  33. Friend and Foe: The image of Germany and the Germans in British children's fiction from 1870 to the present
  34. Internationalization as Strategic Change: The Case of Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
  35. Ecological sustainability - a customer requirement ? Evidence from the automotive industry
  36. Zwecke von betrieblichen Umweltinformationssystemen im Rahmen einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung
  37. § 328 Beschränkung der Rechte
  38. Orientierung