Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading. / Schaltegger, Stefan; Thomas, Tom.
In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.10.1996, p. 35-53.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Schaltegger S, Thomas T. Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading. Ecological Economics. 1996 Oct 1;19(1):35-53. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

Bibtex

@article{34841dbff2cd4dffbe242da7734ba54e,
title = "Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT): New Dimensions in Emissions Trading",
abstract = "To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced {\textquoteleft}incentive-based{\textquoteright} programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Entrepreneurship",
author = "Stefan Schaltegger and Tom Thomas",
note = "Funding Information: S.S. is exceedingly thankful for the generous support from the Swiss National Science Foundation. We are very grateful to Herman E. Daly, Ren~ L. Frey, Ana Roque de Oliveira, Rob Smith and Tom Tietenberg who helped us to improve the text with their excellent and helpful comments. The authors would also like to acknowledge the diligent research assistance of James Atkinson and Melissa Schilling. The usual disclaimer applies of course.",
year = "1996",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "35--53",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pollution Added Credit Trading (PACT)

T2 - New Dimensions in Emissions Trading

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Thomas, Tom

N1 - Funding Information: S.S. is exceedingly thankful for the generous support from the Swiss National Science Foundation. We are very grateful to Herman E. Daly, Ren~ L. Frey, Ana Roque de Oliveira, Rob Smith and Tom Tietenberg who helped us to improve the text with their excellent and helpful comments. The authors would also like to acknowledge the diligent research assistance of James Atkinson and Melissa Schilling. The usual disclaimer applies of course.

PY - 1996/10/1

Y1 - 1996/10/1

N2 - To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced ‘incentive-based’ programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.

AB - To date, sources of hazardous, toxic, or otherwise harmful emissions have been regulated on a pollutant by pollutant basis. Environmental policies, even the more advanced ‘incentive-based’ programs, have focused on individual substances rather than on the overall environmental problem to which the substances contribute. This has produced results that are less economically efficient and ecologically effective than is desirable. A more comprehensive approach combines the principles of emission reduction credit trading with advances made recently in the field of environmental impact assessment, to yield an advanced form of inter-pollutant trading, which we refer to as pollution added credit trading (PACT). PACT incorporates a method for estimating the total environmental harm generated (pollution added) by a facility emitting a variety of pollutants. Weightings that reflect relative harm are used to calculate total pollution added. Each facility covered by PACT would receive annual allowances for total pollution added that they could discharge to the environment. As with existing emissions trading programs, surplus allowances could be sold and shortfalls would be covered by purchasing other facilities' surplus allowances. PACT is more efficient than single-pollutant emissions trading in that it captures differences in marginal reduction costs that exist between pollutants as well as between facilities. It is more ecologically effective because it focuses on the overall environmental problem, rather than on the individual pollutants that contribute to the problem.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Entrepreneurship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030251219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

DO - 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00067-5

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 19

SP - 35

EP - 53

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

IS - 1

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Coherence of European legal and structural conditions in water, wetland and flood risk management
  2. Geschlechtlichkeit als Situation
  3. Weibliche Größenphantasien in Rezeptionsprozessen.
  4. Balancing Acts
  5. Educational Development Processes of Male Adolescents from Immigrant Families
  6. Holunderblüten
  7. Unmenschliche Behandlung
  8. Vom Süden lernen
  9. Der Tod Christi als Sühnopfer
  10. The Top 100 Companies Panel Database
  11. The role of past interactions in great apes' communication about absent entities
  12. Äußere Souveränität
  13. Modellierung und simulation des material- und mikrostrukturverhaltens thermisch gespritzter schichten
  14. Auf der Innenseite der Sprache
  15. Was hat Francis Bacon mit Nachhaltigkeit und neoliberaler Globalisierung zu tun? Feminist sites
  16. Ambulantisierung der Jugendhilfe - Entwicklungsmöglichkeit oder Sackgasse
  17. Earnings baths by bank CEOs during turnovers
  18. Natur und Landschaft
  19. Heldenmädchen und gespaltene Männer
  20. Ausschreibungsmodelle für Erneuerbare Energien
  21. Not Just Riot Grrrls! Punk Rock Feminism in the Philippines
  22. Österreich-Tourismus – Zurück zum Wachstumskurs
  23. Wie können sich Schulen durch musikpädagogische Förderung weiterentwickeln?
  24. Arts Management: A Sociological Inquiry
  25. Eine internetbasierte Intervention zur Verbesserung des psychischen Wohlbefindens bei hochbelasteten Arbeitnehmern
  26. Valuation Beyond the Market: On Symbolic and Economic Value in Contemporary Art
  27. Einleitung: Warum hacken?
  28. Claimed Legitimacy: Appreciating the Diversity of Regional Organizations
  29. Entrepreneurial teams vs management teams
  30. „Beziehungsweise“ werden oder das sozialisatorische Potential von Freundschaften unter Jugendlichen
  31. Globale Vielzahl oder lokale Vielfalt
  32. Screening for PBT chemicals among the “existing” and “new” chemicals of the EU
  33. Aufbruchstimmung im Mädchen- und Frauenfußball!
  34. The Grime of Critique
  35. Beratungsarbeit im "Zwischen"
  36. Implementierung von Aspekten Forschenden Lernens in den Chemieunterricht der Sekundarstufe II
  37. Klein, Naomi (b. 1970) and the Movement Against Neoliberal Globalization