Perceived inclusivity and trust in protected area management decisions among stakeholders in Alaska

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

The success of conservation initiatives often depends on the inclusion of diverse stakeholder interests in the decision-making process. Yet, there is a paucity of empirical knowledge concerning the factors that explain why stakeholders do—or do not— believe that they are meaningfully represented by government agencies. Our study provides insight into the relationship between trust and stakeholder perceptions of inclusivity in public land management decisions. Here, we focus on the U.S. state of Alaska, where almost two-thirds of the land area are managed by the federal government. We used structural equation modelling to test whether an individual's trust and the information sources used to learn about land management positively influenced perceived inclusivity. We conceptualized trust in terms of four dimensions that reflected an individual's disposition to trust, trust in the federal government, trust in shared values and trust that agencies adhere to a moral code. We found that survey respondents across the U.S. state of Alaska had a limited disposition to trust others, did not trust federal land management agencies, did not believe agencies shared their values pertaining to protected area management and did not believe that agencies adhered to a moral code. Beliefs about the morality of agencies were the primary driver of perceived inclusivity in land management decisions, indicating that agencies should focus on solving problems through deliberation and discussion about moral principles rather than by force. Information acquired from professional, community-based or environmental advocacy exchanges also positively influenced perceived levels of involvement among stakeholders in resource management decisions. These results provide a roadmap for how land management agencies can improve public relations and work towards a model of inclusive conservation around protected areas. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPeople and Nature
Volume4
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)758-772
Number of pages15
ISSN2575-8314
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.06.2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided by a Cooperative Agreement with the National Park Service (P18AC00175) a project called ENVISION funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA‐Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), US National Science Foundation (grant number 1854767), and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain. We also thank for the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin and the Center of Advanced Study, as well as the University of Illinois Campus Research Board (RB19119). We are grateful for support throughout our research process provided by William Stewart, Christopher Raymond, Dana Johnson, Rose Keller, Evan Salcido, Eric Johnson, Dave Schirokauer and Ruth Colianni.

Funding Information:
Funding for this research was provided by a Cooperative Agreement with the National Park Service (P18AC00175) a project called ENVISION funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND programme, and with the support of the following national funders: Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS), Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), US National Science Foundation (grant number 1854767), and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain. We also thank for the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin and the Center of Advanced Study, as well as the University of Illinois Campus Research Board (RB19119). We are grateful for support throughout our research process provided by William Stewart, Christopher Raymond, Dana Johnson, Rose Keller, Evan Salcido, Eric Johnson, Dave Schirokauer and Ruth Colianni.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Das Lehrerbild als symbolische Form
  2. Role of scavengers in providing non-material contributions to people
  3. Plant diversity surpasses plant functional groups and plant productivity as driver of soil biota in the long term
  4. Das Größenverständnis im Grundschulalter
  5. The Sound of Skateboarding
  6. The impact of introductions in telephone surveys
  7. +1: Rodrigo Nunes, "Organisation of the Organisationless: Collective Action after Networks", Mute, London and Post-Media Lab, Lüneburg 2014
  8. Participation in Residential Childcare.
  9. Schulleitung - ein belastender Job?
  10. Business model communication and financial performance in crossnational acquisitions
  11. Zur Notwendigkeit eines „CSR-RUG 2.0“
  12. Catching the liar as a matter of justice
  13. The global emergence of social protection
  14. Strategic environmental assessment for the utilization of offshore wind energy
  15. Environmental risk assessment of anti-cancer drugs and their transformation products
  16. Photodegradation of the antineoplastic cyclophosphamide
  17. Between Art and Promotion
  18. Longitudinal and Latitudinal Distribution of Perfluoroalkyl Compounds in the Surface Water of the Atlantic Ocean
  19. Formen des Biodiversitätsmanagements
  20. Wertetransmission und Wertewandel
  21. Food waste and manure
  22. Healthy Eating and Physical Activity in Schools in Europe
  23. Computer Support for Cooperative Sustainability Communication
  24. "White and educated?" Toward a (More) Diverse Climate Movement
  25. Organizational justice and managerial commitment in corporate mergers
  26. Methodik der ökologischen Rechnungslegung in Unternehmen
  27. Emotionale Interfaces in der Fahrzeugsteuerung
  28. Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19
  29. Throwing Bombs in the Consciousness of the Masses