Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity. / Plieninger, Tobias; Thapa, Pramila; Bhaskar, Dhanya et al.

in: Landscape and Urban Planning, Jahrgang 222, 104399, 01.06.2022.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Plieninger T, Thapa P, Bhaskar D, Nagendra H, Torralba M, Zoderer BM. Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022 Jun 1;222:104399. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399

Bibtex

@article{2e806bb1ac3d48799221d181554f346d,
title = "Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity",
abstract = "Restoring, maintaining, and developing green and blue infrastructure (GBI) in cities is a key strategy to safeguard ecosystem services and human well-being under conditions of rapid urbanization. Developing “blue infrastructure” is a new concept, but there are diverse historically grown water management systems that have the potential to inform contemporary debates about GBI. The aim of this study is to identify how local people perceive ecosystem services from a historically grown type of blue infrastructure (lakes), considering multiple interactions between ecosystem services categories, lake types, rural-urban environments, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. We performed a photo-elicitation survey among 536 residents along two urban-rural gradients in Bengaluru (Bangalore), India, asking about perceptions of ecosystem services from water-filled and dry lakes, challenges, and management options. Our results showed that blue infrastructures provide a multitude of ecosystem services that benefit people, with regulating and cultural services standing out. Both water-filled and dry lakes proved important for local people, but they supply different types of ecosystem services. While urbanisation level had a significant influence on how people perceive different ecosystem services from lakes, sociodemographic differences in the assessments were relatively low. Proposed management options departed substantially from those commonly proposed in the literature. We conclude that lakes are of high societal importance compared to their small surfaces, given their capacity to provide a host of ecosystem services. They should become keystone structures of GBI development for sustainable urbanisation in the Global South.",
keywords = "Environmental justice, Lakes, Multifunctionality, Photo elicitation, Rural-urban gradient, Urbanisation, Sustainability Governance, Environmental planning",
author = "Tobias Plieninger and Pramila Thapa and Dhanya Bhaskar and Harini Nagendra and Mario Torralba and Zoderer, {Brenda Maria}",
note = "Funding Information: We are grateful to our enumerators and all residents who were willing to respond to our interviews despite the uncertainties of the covid19 pandemic. We thank Marilena Reinhard-Kolempas for supporting the analysis of the qualitative data, Rebecca Groninga for creating the map, and Imke Horstmannshoff for designing the graphical abstract. We acknowledge the financial support provided by the German Research Foundation, DFG, through grant number 421285339 (FOR2432/2). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

AU - Thapa, Pramila

AU - Bhaskar, Dhanya

AU - Nagendra, Harini

AU - Torralba, Mario

AU - Zoderer, Brenda Maria

N1 - Funding Information: We are grateful to our enumerators and all residents who were willing to respond to our interviews despite the uncertainties of the covid19 pandemic. We thank Marilena Reinhard-Kolempas for supporting the analysis of the qualitative data, Rebecca Groninga for creating the map, and Imke Horstmannshoff for designing the graphical abstract. We acknowledge the financial support provided by the German Research Foundation, DFG, through grant number 421285339 (FOR2432/2). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022/6/1

Y1 - 2022/6/1

N2 - Restoring, maintaining, and developing green and blue infrastructure (GBI) in cities is a key strategy to safeguard ecosystem services and human well-being under conditions of rapid urbanization. Developing “blue infrastructure” is a new concept, but there are diverse historically grown water management systems that have the potential to inform contemporary debates about GBI. The aim of this study is to identify how local people perceive ecosystem services from a historically grown type of blue infrastructure (lakes), considering multiple interactions between ecosystem services categories, lake types, rural-urban environments, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. We performed a photo-elicitation survey among 536 residents along two urban-rural gradients in Bengaluru (Bangalore), India, asking about perceptions of ecosystem services from water-filled and dry lakes, challenges, and management options. Our results showed that blue infrastructures provide a multitude of ecosystem services that benefit people, with regulating and cultural services standing out. Both water-filled and dry lakes proved important for local people, but they supply different types of ecosystem services. While urbanisation level had a significant influence on how people perceive different ecosystem services from lakes, sociodemographic differences in the assessments were relatively low. Proposed management options departed substantially from those commonly proposed in the literature. We conclude that lakes are of high societal importance compared to their small surfaces, given their capacity to provide a host of ecosystem services. They should become keystone structures of GBI development for sustainable urbanisation in the Global South.

AB - Restoring, maintaining, and developing green and blue infrastructure (GBI) in cities is a key strategy to safeguard ecosystem services and human well-being under conditions of rapid urbanization. Developing “blue infrastructure” is a new concept, but there are diverse historically grown water management systems that have the potential to inform contemporary debates about GBI. The aim of this study is to identify how local people perceive ecosystem services from a historically grown type of blue infrastructure (lakes), considering multiple interactions between ecosystem services categories, lake types, rural-urban environments, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. We performed a photo-elicitation survey among 536 residents along two urban-rural gradients in Bengaluru (Bangalore), India, asking about perceptions of ecosystem services from water-filled and dry lakes, challenges, and management options. Our results showed that blue infrastructures provide a multitude of ecosystem services that benefit people, with regulating and cultural services standing out. Both water-filled and dry lakes proved important for local people, but they supply different types of ecosystem services. While urbanisation level had a significant influence on how people perceive different ecosystem services from lakes, sociodemographic differences in the assessments were relatively low. Proposed management options departed substantially from those commonly proposed in the literature. We conclude that lakes are of high societal importance compared to their small surfaces, given their capacity to provide a host of ecosystem services. They should become keystone structures of GBI development for sustainable urbanisation in the Global South.

KW - Environmental justice

KW - Lakes

KW - Multifunctionality

KW - Photo elicitation

KW - Rural-urban gradient

KW - Urbanisation

KW - Sustainability Governance

KW - Environmental planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125770811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85125770811

VL - 222

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

M1 - 104399

ER -

DOI