Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 222, 104399, 01.06.2022.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Disentangling ecosystem services perceptions from blue infrastructure around a rapidly expanding megacity
AU - Plieninger, Tobias
AU - Thapa, Pramila
AU - Bhaskar, Dhanya
AU - Nagendra, Harini
AU - Torralba, Mario
AU - Zoderer, Brenda Maria
N1 - Funding Information: We are grateful to our enumerators and all residents who were willing to respond to our interviews despite the uncertainties of the covid19 pandemic. We thank Marilena Reinhard-Kolempas for supporting the analysis of the qualitative data, Rebecca Groninga for creating the map, and Imke Horstmannshoff for designing the graphical abstract. We acknowledge the financial support provided by the German Research Foundation, DFG, through grant number 421285339 (FOR2432/2). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Restoring, maintaining, and developing green and blue infrastructure (GBI) in cities is a key strategy to safeguard ecosystem services and human well-being under conditions of rapid urbanization. Developing “blue infrastructure” is a new concept, but there are diverse historically grown water management systems that have the potential to inform contemporary debates about GBI. The aim of this study is to identify how local people perceive ecosystem services from a historically grown type of blue infrastructure (lakes), considering multiple interactions between ecosystem services categories, lake types, rural-urban environments, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. We performed a photo-elicitation survey among 536 residents along two urban-rural gradients in Bengaluru (Bangalore), India, asking about perceptions of ecosystem services from water-filled and dry lakes, challenges, and management options. Our results showed that blue infrastructures provide a multitude of ecosystem services that benefit people, with regulating and cultural services standing out. Both water-filled and dry lakes proved important for local people, but they supply different types of ecosystem services. While urbanisation level had a significant influence on how people perceive different ecosystem services from lakes, sociodemographic differences in the assessments were relatively low. Proposed management options departed substantially from those commonly proposed in the literature. We conclude that lakes are of high societal importance compared to their small surfaces, given their capacity to provide a host of ecosystem services. They should become keystone structures of GBI development for sustainable urbanisation in the Global South.
AB - Restoring, maintaining, and developing green and blue infrastructure (GBI) in cities is a key strategy to safeguard ecosystem services and human well-being under conditions of rapid urbanization. Developing “blue infrastructure” is a new concept, but there are diverse historically grown water management systems that have the potential to inform contemporary debates about GBI. The aim of this study is to identify how local people perceive ecosystem services from a historically grown type of blue infrastructure (lakes), considering multiple interactions between ecosystem services categories, lake types, rural-urban environments, and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. We performed a photo-elicitation survey among 536 residents along two urban-rural gradients in Bengaluru (Bangalore), India, asking about perceptions of ecosystem services from water-filled and dry lakes, challenges, and management options. Our results showed that blue infrastructures provide a multitude of ecosystem services that benefit people, with regulating and cultural services standing out. Both water-filled and dry lakes proved important for local people, but they supply different types of ecosystem services. While urbanisation level had a significant influence on how people perceive different ecosystem services from lakes, sociodemographic differences in the assessments were relatively low. Proposed management options departed substantially from those commonly proposed in the literature. We conclude that lakes are of high societal importance compared to their small surfaces, given their capacity to provide a host of ecosystem services. They should become keystone structures of GBI development for sustainable urbanisation in the Global South.
KW - Environmental justice
KW - Lakes
KW - Multifunctionality
KW - Photo elicitation
KW - Rural-urban gradient
KW - Urbanisation
KW - Sustainability Governance
KW - Environmental planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125770811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399
DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104399
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85125770811
VL - 222
JO - Landscape and Urban Planning
JF - Landscape and Urban Planning
SN - 0169-2046
M1 - 104399
ER -