Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps: A case study from post-socialist Romania

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps: A case study from post-socialist Romania. / Mikulcak, Friederike; Haider, Jamila L.; Abson, David et al.
in: Land Use Policy, Jahrgang 43, Nr. 2, 01.02.2015, S. 248-258.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c923126f748741c28346f335335d75b7,
title = "Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps: A case study from post-socialist Romania",
abstract = "Rural development models to date have failed to adequately explain why development stagnates in certain regions, and have often focused on single policy areas. This paper proposes a more holistic approach by combining the concept of traps with the sustainable livelihoods approach, applied to a case study in Central Romania. Based on semi-structured interviews with rural inhabitants from 66 villages in 2012, we analyze the barriers creating and maintaining a lock-in situation characterized by an apparently stable low-welfare equilibrium state. By clustering development barriers into livelihood capitals we find that barriers to rural development are multiple and interacting, and are strongly mediated by the institutional context. We show that while financial, social, human, and built capitals are inadequately developed, the region's rich natural and cultural capitals stand the best chances to foster rural development. Yet, these capitals are likely to deteriorate, too, if all other capitals remain under-developed. Given this interconnectedness of development barriers we argue that one-sided interventions cannot help {\textquoteleft}unlock{\textquoteright} the trap-like situation of Central Romania. Instead, multiple barriers will need to be tackled simultaneously. The development of social, human and financial capitals should be of priority concern because of their potentially positive spill-over effects across all other capitals.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, rural development, Traps, Sustainable livelihoods approach, Capitals, Post-communism",
author = "Friederike Mikulcak and Haider, {Jamila L.} and David Abson and Jens Newig and J{\"o}rn Fischer",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.024",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "248--258",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps: A case study from post-socialist Romania

AU - Mikulcak, Friederike

AU - Haider, Jamila L.

AU - Abson, David

AU - Newig, Jens

AU - Fischer, Jörn

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Rural development models to date have failed to adequately explain why development stagnates in certain regions, and have often focused on single policy areas. This paper proposes a more holistic approach by combining the concept of traps with the sustainable livelihoods approach, applied to a case study in Central Romania. Based on semi-structured interviews with rural inhabitants from 66 villages in 2012, we analyze the barriers creating and maintaining a lock-in situation characterized by an apparently stable low-welfare equilibrium state. By clustering development barriers into livelihood capitals we find that barriers to rural development are multiple and interacting, and are strongly mediated by the institutional context. We show that while financial, social, human, and built capitals are inadequately developed, the region's rich natural and cultural capitals stand the best chances to foster rural development. Yet, these capitals are likely to deteriorate, too, if all other capitals remain under-developed. Given this interconnectedness of development barriers we argue that one-sided interventions cannot help ‘unlock’ the trap-like situation of Central Romania. Instead, multiple barriers will need to be tackled simultaneously. The development of social, human and financial capitals should be of priority concern because of their potentially positive spill-over effects across all other capitals.

AB - Rural development models to date have failed to adequately explain why development stagnates in certain regions, and have often focused on single policy areas. This paper proposes a more holistic approach by combining the concept of traps with the sustainable livelihoods approach, applied to a case study in Central Romania. Based on semi-structured interviews with rural inhabitants from 66 villages in 2012, we analyze the barriers creating and maintaining a lock-in situation characterized by an apparently stable low-welfare equilibrium state. By clustering development barriers into livelihood capitals we find that barriers to rural development are multiple and interacting, and are strongly mediated by the institutional context. We show that while financial, social, human, and built capitals are inadequately developed, the region's rich natural and cultural capitals stand the best chances to foster rural development. Yet, these capitals are likely to deteriorate, too, if all other capitals remain under-developed. Given this interconnectedness of development barriers we argue that one-sided interventions cannot help ‘unlock’ the trap-like situation of Central Romania. Instead, multiple barriers will need to be tackled simultaneously. The development of social, human and financial capitals should be of priority concern because of their potentially positive spill-over effects across all other capitals.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - rural development

KW - Traps

KW - Sustainable livelihoods approach

KW - Capitals

KW - Post-communism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920077585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.024

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.024

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 43

SP - 248

EP - 258

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 2

ER -

DOI