Tripartite networks show that keystone species can multitask
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Functional Ecology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 02.2023, p. 274-286.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Tripartite networks show that keystone species can multitask
AU - Timóteo, Sérgio
AU - Albrecht, Jörg
AU - Rumeu, Beatriz
AU - Norte, Ana C.
AU - Traveset, Anna
AU - Frost, Carol M.
AU - Marchante, Elizabete
AU - López-Núñez, Francisco A.
AU - Peralta, Guadalupe
AU - Memmott, Jane
AU - Olesen, Jens M.
AU - Costa, José M.
AU - da Silva, Luís P.
AU - Carvalheiro, Luísa G.
AU - Correia, Marta
AU - Staab, Michael
AU - Blüthgen, Nico
AU - Farwig, Nina
AU - Hervías-Parejo, Sandra
AU - Mironov, Sergei
AU - Rodríguez-Echeverría, Susana
AU - Heleno, Ruben
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Keystone species are disproportionately important for ecosystem functioning. While all species engage in multiple interaction types with other species, keystone species importance is often defined based on a single dimension of their Eltonian niche, that is, one type of interaction (e.g. keystone predator). It remains unclear whether the importance of keystone species is unidimensional or if it extends across interaction types. We conducted a meta-analysis of tripartite interaction networks examining whether species importance in one dimension of their niche is mirrored in other niche dimensions, and whether this is associated with interaction outcome, intimacy or species richness. We show that keystone species importance is positively associated across multiple ecological niche dimensions, independently of abundance, and find no evidence that multidimensionality of keystone species is influenced by the explanatory variables. We propose that the role of keystone species extends across multiple ecological niche dimensions, with important implications for ecosystem resilience and conservation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
AB - Keystone species are disproportionately important for ecosystem functioning. While all species engage in multiple interaction types with other species, keystone species importance is often defined based on a single dimension of their Eltonian niche, that is, one type of interaction (e.g. keystone predator). It remains unclear whether the importance of keystone species is unidimensional or if it extends across interaction types. We conducted a meta-analysis of tripartite interaction networks examining whether species importance in one dimension of their niche is mirrored in other niche dimensions, and whether this is associated with interaction outcome, intimacy or species richness. We show that keystone species importance is positively associated across multiple ecological niche dimensions, independently of abundance, and find no evidence that multidimensionality of keystone species is influenced by the explanatory variables. We propose that the role of keystone species extends across multiple ecological niche dimensions, with important implications for ecosystem resilience and conservation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
KW - Eltonian niche
KW - functional niche space
KW - keystone species
KW - keystoneness
KW - meta-analysis
KW - multitrophic interactions
KW - species importance
KW - tri-trophic networks
KW - tripartite networks
KW - Biology
KW - Ecosystems Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141387679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2435.14206
DO - 10.1111/1365-2435.14206
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85141387679
VL - 37
SP - 274
EP - 286
JO - Functional Ecology
JF - Functional Ecology
SN - 0269-8463
IS - 2
ER -