The explanatory power of Carnegie Classification in predicting engagement indicators: a multilevel analysis
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Frontiers in Education, Vol. 8, 1305747, 08.01.2024.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The explanatory power of Carnegie Classification in predicting engagement indicators
T2 - a multilevel analysis
AU - Gök, Enes
AU - Aydin, Burak
N1 - Funding Information: The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (Project ID: 1059B192000009). This publication was funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of the Leuphana University Lüneburg. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2024 Gök and Aydin.
PY - 2024/1/8
Y1 - 2024/1/8
N2 - The study aims to explore the effect of the type of higher education institution on students’ engagement. The meta-analyses of multilevel regression coefficients revealed significant relationships between the type of higher education institution and student engagement indicators across the years from 2013 to 2019. Comparing different types of higher education institutions with the base category, our findings revealed significant differences in effective teaching practices, discussion with diverse others, and student-faculty interaction consistent throughout the years. These findings are expected to provide insights for institutional administrators, policymakers, and researchers given that student engagement in higher education has become an indicator of quality all around the world.
AB - The study aims to explore the effect of the type of higher education institution on students’ engagement. The meta-analyses of multilevel regression coefficients revealed significant relationships between the type of higher education institution and student engagement indicators across the years from 2013 to 2019. Comparing different types of higher education institutions with the base category, our findings revealed significant differences in effective teaching practices, discussion with diverse others, and student-faculty interaction consistent throughout the years. These findings are expected to provide insights for institutional administrators, policymakers, and researchers given that student engagement in higher education has become an indicator of quality all around the world.
KW - assessment
KW - Carnegie Classification
KW - higher education
KW - multilevel analysis
KW - student engagement
KW - Educational science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182665796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8111e9b6-7208-315f-b582-7f6e5ec54727/
U2 - 10.3389/feduc.2023.1305747
DO - 10.3389/feduc.2023.1305747
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85182665796
VL - 8
JO - Frontiers in Education
JF - Frontiers in Education
SN - 2504-284X
M1 - 1305747
ER -