States and traits: Theories, models, and assessment

Christian Geiser; Thomas Götz; Franzis Preckel; Philipp Alexander Freund

doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000413

States and traits: Theories, models, and assessment

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

States and traits: Theories, models, and assessment. / Geiser, Christian; Götz, Thomas; Preckel, Franzis et al.
In: European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol. 33, No. 4, 07.2017, p. 219-223.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Bibtex

@article{2f0afd76340e40ec92c6d3c0d516b1de,

title = "States and traits: Theories, models, and assessment",

abstract = "The question of whether characteristics of persons (stable personality dispositions that are often referred to as traits), characteristics of situations, or Person × Situation interactions are more relevant to psychological behavior has been debated for decades (e.g., Donnellan, Lucas, & Fleeson, 2009; Epstein, 1983; Fleeson, 2001, 2004; Funder, 1991, 2008; Funder, Guillaume, Kumagai, Kawamoto, & Sato, 2012; Kenrick & Funder, 1988; Mischel, 1968). In psychological measurement, the distinction between trait (enduring or stable) components and state residual (variable or fluctuating) components has been of ever-increasing interest to researchers since the 1980s and 1990s when more sophisticated theoretical and statistical approaches became available (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992; Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger, & Buchner, 1989). Furthermore, new methodological approaches have recently been developed to better conceptualize and understand psychological situations (e.g., Rauthmann, Sherman, & Funder, 2015)",

keywords = "Psychology",

author = "Christian Geiser and Thomas G{\"o}tz and Franzis Preckel and Freund, {Philipp Alexander}",

note = "Editorial",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1027/1015-5759/a000413",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "219--223",

journal = "European Journal of Psychological Assessment",

issn = "1015-5759",

publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",

number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - States and traits

T2 - Theories, models, and assessment

AU - Geiser, Christian

AU - Götz, Thomas

AU - Preckel, Franzis

AU - Freund, Philipp Alexander

N1 - Editorial

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - The question of whether characteristics of persons (stable personality dispositions that are often referred to as traits), characteristics of situations, or Person × Situation interactions are more relevant to psychological behavior has been debated for decades (e.g., Donnellan, Lucas, & Fleeson, 2009; Epstein, 1983; Fleeson, 2001, 2004; Funder, 1991, 2008; Funder, Guillaume, Kumagai, Kawamoto, & Sato, 2012; Kenrick & Funder, 1988; Mischel, 1968). In psychological measurement, the distinction between trait (enduring or stable) components and state residual (variable or fluctuating) components has been of ever-increasing interest to researchers since the 1980s and 1990s when more sophisticated theoretical and statistical approaches became available (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992; Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger, & Buchner, 1989). Furthermore, new methodological approaches have recently been developed to better conceptualize and understand psychological situations (e.g., Rauthmann, Sherman, & Funder, 2015)

AB - The question of whether characteristics of persons (stable personality dispositions that are often referred to as traits), characteristics of situations, or Person × Situation interactions are more relevant to psychological behavior has been debated for decades (e.g., Donnellan, Lucas, & Fleeson, 2009; Epstein, 1983; Fleeson, 2001, 2004; Funder, 1991, 2008; Funder, Guillaume, Kumagai, Kawamoto, & Sato, 2012; Kenrick & Funder, 1988; Mischel, 1968). In psychological measurement, the distinction between trait (enduring or stable) components and state residual (variable or fluctuating) components has been of ever-increasing interest to researchers since the 1980s and 1990s when more sophisticated theoretical and statistical approaches became available (Steyer, Ferring, & Schmitt, 1992; Steyer, Majcen, Schwenkmezger, & Buchner, 1989). Furthermore, new methodological approaches have recently been developed to better conceptualize and understand psychological situations (e.g., Rauthmann, Sherman, & Funder, 2015)

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029786259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000413

DO - 10.1027/1015-5759/a000413

M3 - Scientific review articles

VL - 33

SP - 219

EP - 223

JO - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

JF - European Journal of Psychological Assessment

SN - 1015-5759

IS - 4

ER -