Smartphone bans and workplace performance

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Smartphone bans and workplace performance. / Chadi, Adrian; Mechtel, Mario; Mertins, Vanessa.
In: Experimental Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.02.2022, p. 287-317.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chadi A, Mechtel M, Mertins V. Smartphone bans and workplace performance. Experimental Economics. 2022 Feb 1;25(1):287-317. Epub 2021 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09715-w

Bibtex

@article{f27084cbefc34d0984e26300fc913108,
title = "Smartphone bans and workplace performance",
abstract = "This paper constitutes the first economic investigation into the potential detrimental role of smartphones in the workplace based on a field experiment. We exploit the conduct of a nationwide telephone survey, for which interviewers were recruited to work individually and in single offices for half a day. This setting allows to randomly impose bans on the use of interviewers{\textquoteright} personal smartphones during worktime while ruling out information spillovers between treatment conditions. Although the ban was not enforceable, we observe substantial effort increases from banning smartphones in the routine task of calling households, without negative implications linked to perceived employer distrust. Analyzing the number of conducted interviews per interviewer suggests that higher efforts do not necessarily translate into economic benefits for the employer. In our broad discussion of smartphone bans and their potential impact on workplace performance, we consider further outcomes of economic relevance based on data from employee surveys and administrative phone records. Finally, we complement the findings of our field experiment with evidence from a survey experiment and a survey among managers.",
keywords = "Control, Effort choice, Field experiment, Smartphone ban, Trust, Workplace behavior, Economics",
author = "Adrian Chadi and Mario Mechtel and Vanessa Mertins",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Agnes B{\"a}ker, Urs Fischbacher, Inga Hillesheim, Matthias Heinz, Florian Hett, Manuel Hoffmann, Dirk Sliwka, Nick Zubanov, the editor in charge, Roberto Weber, two anonymous referees, and the participants of the Workshop on Experimental Labour and Personnel Economics in Trier 2015, the 2015 NCBEE in Tampere, the 2015 European Meeting of the ESA in Heidelberg, the 2015 IAB/ZEW Workshop in Mannheim, the 3rd Experimental Methods in Policy Conference in Ixtapa 2016, the 2016 Colloquium on Personnel Economics in Aachen, the 2016 IMEBESS Conference in Rome, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the SOLE in Seattle, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the ESPE in Berlin, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the German Economic Association in Augsburg, the 2016 EALE Conference in Ghent, the 2017 LISER-LAB Inaugural Workshop in Esch-sur-Alzette, and seminar participants at U L{\"u}neburg, U Trier and of the Berlin Network of Labor Market Researchers for helpful suggestions. We thank the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Berlin (Industrie- und Handelskammer) for collaborating with the employer survey. Furthermore, we thank Martin Amann and Ruth Regnauer for providing excellent research assistance with the field experiment and Maximilian Hiller for excellent support with the survey experiment. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10683-021-09715-w",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "287--317",
journal = "Experimental Economics",
issn = "1386-4157",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smartphone bans and workplace performance

AU - Chadi, Adrian

AU - Mechtel, Mario

AU - Mertins, Vanessa

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Agnes Bäker, Urs Fischbacher, Inga Hillesheim, Matthias Heinz, Florian Hett, Manuel Hoffmann, Dirk Sliwka, Nick Zubanov, the editor in charge, Roberto Weber, two anonymous referees, and the participants of the Workshop on Experimental Labour and Personnel Economics in Trier 2015, the 2015 NCBEE in Tampere, the 2015 European Meeting of the ESA in Heidelberg, the 2015 IAB/ZEW Workshop in Mannheim, the 3rd Experimental Methods in Policy Conference in Ixtapa 2016, the 2016 Colloquium on Personnel Economics in Aachen, the 2016 IMEBESS Conference in Rome, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the SOLE in Seattle, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the ESPE in Berlin, the 2016 Annual Meeting of the German Economic Association in Augsburg, the 2016 EALE Conference in Ghent, the 2017 LISER-LAB Inaugural Workshop in Esch-sur-Alzette, and seminar participants at U Lüneburg, U Trier and of the Berlin Network of Labor Market Researchers for helpful suggestions. We thank the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Berlin (Industrie- und Handelskammer) for collaborating with the employer survey. Furthermore, we thank Martin Amann and Ruth Regnauer for providing excellent research assistance with the field experiment and Maximilian Hiller for excellent support with the survey experiment. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2022/2/1

Y1 - 2022/2/1

N2 - This paper constitutes the first economic investigation into the potential detrimental role of smartphones in the workplace based on a field experiment. We exploit the conduct of a nationwide telephone survey, for which interviewers were recruited to work individually and in single offices for half a day. This setting allows to randomly impose bans on the use of interviewers’ personal smartphones during worktime while ruling out information spillovers between treatment conditions. Although the ban was not enforceable, we observe substantial effort increases from banning smartphones in the routine task of calling households, without negative implications linked to perceived employer distrust. Analyzing the number of conducted interviews per interviewer suggests that higher efforts do not necessarily translate into economic benefits for the employer. In our broad discussion of smartphone bans and their potential impact on workplace performance, we consider further outcomes of economic relevance based on data from employee surveys and administrative phone records. Finally, we complement the findings of our field experiment with evidence from a survey experiment and a survey among managers.

AB - This paper constitutes the first economic investigation into the potential detrimental role of smartphones in the workplace based on a field experiment. We exploit the conduct of a nationwide telephone survey, for which interviewers were recruited to work individually and in single offices for half a day. This setting allows to randomly impose bans on the use of interviewers’ personal smartphones during worktime while ruling out information spillovers between treatment conditions. Although the ban was not enforceable, we observe substantial effort increases from banning smartphones in the routine task of calling households, without negative implications linked to perceived employer distrust. Analyzing the number of conducted interviews per interviewer suggests that higher efforts do not necessarily translate into economic benefits for the employer. In our broad discussion of smartphone bans and their potential impact on workplace performance, we consider further outcomes of economic relevance based on data from employee surveys and administrative phone records. Finally, we complement the findings of our field experiment with evidence from a survey experiment and a survey among managers.

KW - Control

KW - Effort choice

KW - Field experiment

KW - Smartphone ban

KW - Trust

KW - Workplace behavior

KW - Economics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105400300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10683-021-09715-w

DO - 10.1007/s10683-021-09715-w

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85105400300

VL - 25

SP - 287

EP - 317

JO - Experimental Economics

JF - Experimental Economics

SN - 1386-4157

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Jessica Nowoczien

Publications

  1. Formación docente en química y ambientación curricular
  2. Reform der Juristenausbildung
  3. Löwenbaby
  4. Der Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD):
  5. The course of research into the economic consequences of German works councils
  6. Beyond the finance paradigm
  7. Ombuds- und Beschwerdestellen in der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
  8. Einfluss maschineller Pflegemaßnahmen auf die Nährstoffdynamik von Sandheiden
  9. Political Culture, Value Change, and Mass Beliefs
  10. Die Krisenwarn- und Krisenberatungsfunktion des Abschlussprüfers
  11. Verknüpfung von Self-Assessments und Verfahren zur Studierendenauswahl am Beispiel der Lehrerbildung in Lüneburg
  12. Digitale Gesundheitskommunikation und -kompetenzen in Zeiten von COVID-19.
  13. Einkommens- und Verteilungsanalysen mit dem Taxpayer-Panel
  14. Le nouveau paradigme écologique Pour une écologie générale des médias et des techniques
  15. Medienpsychologie
  16. Nature-gender relations within a Social-Ecological Perspective on European Multifunctional Agriculture
  17. Musik maker.
  18. Kooperationsaufgaben von Stützlehrern im Spannungsfeld von Professionalisierung und strukturellen Rahmenbedingungen
  19. Does immigration boost per capita income?
  20. Materialitäten der Kindheit
  21. Forschungsbereiche im Themenfeld Geschlechterverhältnisse und Nachhaltigkeit
  22. Souveränität und Entscheidung
  23. Ergebnis vom Kohlekompromiss
  24. Bildung, Pluralität und Demokratie
  25. Einfluss der Corporate Governance auf das Controlling und Reporting
  26. Datenbasierte Ursachenanalysen zur Verbesserung der logistischen Zielerreichung
  27. Ausspracheprobleme weißrussischer Deutschlernender und Schritte zur korrekten Aussprache
  28. Ein "altliberaler" Denker? Helmut Schelsky zwischen Sachlichkeit und Demokratie
  29. § 43 VwGO Feststellungsklage
  30. La deuxième conférence de La Haye et le règlement pacifique des différends
  31. Ökonomische Aspekte der Biodiversität
  32. Comedy in Serie : medienwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf ein TV-Format
  33. Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung und ihre Potenziale für eine zukunftsfähige Grundschule
  34. Kommentierte Bibliographie
  35. Portfoliotheorie und Vermögensverwaltung
  36. Anfängerklausur Öffentliches Recht: Staatsorganisationsrecht