Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence. / Harks, Birgit; Klieme, Eckhard; Hartig, Johannes et al.
In: Educational Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 4, 02.10.2014, p. 243-266.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Harks B, Klieme E, Hartig J, Leiss D. Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence. Educational Assessment. 2014 Oct 2;19(4):243-266. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2014.964114

Bibtex

@article{72362bfbf3354e169aea6aa952012c09,
title = "Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence",
abstract = "The present study investigates the empirical separability of mathematical (a) content domains, (b) cognitive domains, and (c) content-specific cognitive domains. There were 122 items representing two content domains (linear equations vs. theorem of Pythagoras) combined with two cognitive domains (modeling competence vs. technical competence) administered in a study with 1,570 German ninth graders. A unidimensional item response theory model, two two-dimensional multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) models (dimensions: content domains and cognitive domains, respectively), and a four-dimensional MIRT model (dimensions: content-specific cognitive domains) were compared with regard to model fit and latent correlations. Results indicate that the two content and the two cognitive domains can each be empirically separated. Content domains are better separable than cognitive domains. A differentiation of content-specific cognitive domains shows the best fit to the empirical data. Differential gender effects mostly confirm that the separated dimensions have different psychological meaning. Potential explanations, practical implications, and possible directions for future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Empirical education research",
author = "Birgit Harks and Eckhard Klieme and Johannes Hartig and Dominik Leiss",
year = "2014",
month = oct,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10627197.2014.964114",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "243--266",
journal = "Educational Assessment",
issn = "1062-7197",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Separating Cognitive and Content Domains in Mathematical Competence

AU - Harks, Birgit

AU - Klieme, Eckhard

AU - Hartig, Johannes

AU - Leiss, Dominik

PY - 2014/10/2

Y1 - 2014/10/2

N2 - The present study investigates the empirical separability of mathematical (a) content domains, (b) cognitive domains, and (c) content-specific cognitive domains. There were 122 items representing two content domains (linear equations vs. theorem of Pythagoras) combined with two cognitive domains (modeling competence vs. technical competence) administered in a study with 1,570 German ninth graders. A unidimensional item response theory model, two two-dimensional multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) models (dimensions: content domains and cognitive domains, respectively), and a four-dimensional MIRT model (dimensions: content-specific cognitive domains) were compared with regard to model fit and latent correlations. Results indicate that the two content and the two cognitive domains can each be empirically separated. Content domains are better separable than cognitive domains. A differentiation of content-specific cognitive domains shows the best fit to the empirical data. Differential gender effects mostly confirm that the separated dimensions have different psychological meaning. Potential explanations, practical implications, and possible directions for future research are discussed.

AB - The present study investigates the empirical separability of mathematical (a) content domains, (b) cognitive domains, and (c) content-specific cognitive domains. There were 122 items representing two content domains (linear equations vs. theorem of Pythagoras) combined with two cognitive domains (modeling competence vs. technical competence) administered in a study with 1,570 German ninth graders. A unidimensional item response theory model, two two-dimensional multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) models (dimensions: content domains and cognitive domains, respectively), and a four-dimensional MIRT model (dimensions: content-specific cognitive domains) were compared with regard to model fit and latent correlations. Results indicate that the two content and the two cognitive domains can each be empirically separated. Content domains are better separable than cognitive domains. A differentiation of content-specific cognitive domains shows the best fit to the empirical data. Differential gender effects mostly confirm that the separated dimensions have different psychological meaning. Potential explanations, practical implications, and possible directions for future research are discussed.

KW - Empirical education research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911161784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10627197.2014.964114

DO - 10.1080/10627197.2014.964114

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 19

SP - 243

EP - 266

JO - Educational Assessment

JF - Educational Assessment

SN - 1062-7197

IS - 4

ER -