Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses. / Faget, Marc; Nagel, Kerstin A.; Walter, Achim et al.
In: Annals of Botany, Vol. 112, No. 2, 01.07.2013, p. 253-266.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Faget M, Nagel KA, Walter A, Herrera JM, Jahnke S, Schurr U et al. Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses. Annals of Botany. 2013 Jul 1;112(2):253-266. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs296

Bibtex

@article{17c6271e078e43e59829ea38d9107cef,
title = "Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses",
abstract = "BackgroundThere is a large body of literature on competitive interactions among plants, but many studies have only focused on above-ground interactions and little is known about root-root dynamics between interacting plants. The perspective on possible mechanisms that explain the outcome of root-root interactions has recently been extended to include non-resource-driven mechanisms (as well as resource-driven mechanisms) of root competition and positive interactions such as facilitation. These approaches have often suffered from being static, partly due to the lack of appropriate methodologies for in-situ non-destructive root characterization.ScopeRecent studies show that interactive effects of plant neighbourhood interactions follow non-linear and non-additive paths that are hard to explain. Common outcomes such as accumulation of roots mainly in the topsoil cannot be explained solely by competition theory but require a more inclusive theoretical, as well as an improved methodological framework. This will include the question of whether we can apply the same conceptual framework to crop versus natural species.ConclusionsThe development of non-invasive methods to dynamically study root-root interactions in vivo will provide the necessary tools to study a more inclusive conceptual framework for root-root interactions. By following the dynamics of root-root interactions through time in a whole range of scenarios and systems, using a wide variety of non-invasive methods, (such as fluorescent protein which now allows us to separately identify the roots of several individuals within soil), we will be much better equipped to answer some of the key questions in root physiology, ecology and agronomy.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Ecology, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Models, Theoretical, Plant Roots, Positron-Emission Tomography, Soil, Species Specificity, Biology, Sustainability Science, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Marc Faget and Nagel, {Kerstin A.} and Achim Walter and Herrera, {Juan M.} and Siegfried Jahnke and Ulrich Schurr and Temperton, {Victoria Martine}",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aob/mcs296",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "253--266",
journal = "Annals of Botany",
issn = "0305-7364",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Root-root interactions: extending our perspective to be more inclusive of the range of theories in ecology and agriculture using in-vivo analyses

AU - Faget, Marc

AU - Nagel, Kerstin A.

AU - Walter, Achim

AU - Herrera, Juan M.

AU - Jahnke, Siegfried

AU - Schurr, Ulrich

AU - Temperton, Victoria Martine

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - BackgroundThere is a large body of literature on competitive interactions among plants, but many studies have only focused on above-ground interactions and little is known about root-root dynamics between interacting plants. The perspective on possible mechanisms that explain the outcome of root-root interactions has recently been extended to include non-resource-driven mechanisms (as well as resource-driven mechanisms) of root competition and positive interactions such as facilitation. These approaches have often suffered from being static, partly due to the lack of appropriate methodologies for in-situ non-destructive root characterization.ScopeRecent studies show that interactive effects of plant neighbourhood interactions follow non-linear and non-additive paths that are hard to explain. Common outcomes such as accumulation of roots mainly in the topsoil cannot be explained solely by competition theory but require a more inclusive theoretical, as well as an improved methodological framework. This will include the question of whether we can apply the same conceptual framework to crop versus natural species.ConclusionsThe development of non-invasive methods to dynamically study root-root interactions in vivo will provide the necessary tools to study a more inclusive conceptual framework for root-root interactions. By following the dynamics of root-root interactions through time in a whole range of scenarios and systems, using a wide variety of non-invasive methods, (such as fluorescent protein which now allows us to separately identify the roots of several individuals within soil), we will be much better equipped to answer some of the key questions in root physiology, ecology and agronomy.

AB - BackgroundThere is a large body of literature on competitive interactions among plants, but many studies have only focused on above-ground interactions and little is known about root-root dynamics between interacting plants. The perspective on possible mechanisms that explain the outcome of root-root interactions has recently been extended to include non-resource-driven mechanisms (as well as resource-driven mechanisms) of root competition and positive interactions such as facilitation. These approaches have often suffered from being static, partly due to the lack of appropriate methodologies for in-situ non-destructive root characterization.ScopeRecent studies show that interactive effects of plant neighbourhood interactions follow non-linear and non-additive paths that are hard to explain. Common outcomes such as accumulation of roots mainly in the topsoil cannot be explained solely by competition theory but require a more inclusive theoretical, as well as an improved methodological framework. This will include the question of whether we can apply the same conceptual framework to crop versus natural species.ConclusionsThe development of non-invasive methods to dynamically study root-root interactions in vivo will provide the necessary tools to study a more inclusive conceptual framework for root-root interactions. By following the dynamics of root-root interactions through time in a whole range of scenarios and systems, using a wide variety of non-invasive methods, (such as fluorescent protein which now allows us to separately identify the roots of several individuals within soil), we will be much better equipped to answer some of the key questions in root physiology, ecology and agronomy.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Ecology

KW - Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

KW - Models, Theoretical

KW - Plant Roots

KW - Positron-Emission Tomography

KW - Soil

KW - Species Specificity

KW - Biology

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876545600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aob/mcs296

DO - 10.1093/aob/mcs296

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 23378521

VL - 112

SP - 253

EP - 266

JO - Annals of Botany

JF - Annals of Botany

SN - 0305-7364

IS - 2

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. What has gone wrong with application development? Who is the culprit?
  2. Sustainability and management control. Exploring and theorizing control patterns in large European firms
  3. Enhancing Community Interactions with Data-Driven Chatbots - The DBpedia Chatbot
  4. Assuring a safe, secure and sustainable space environment for space activities
  5. Convergence of adaptive learning and expectational stability
  6. “Making Sense”
  7. Robust Decoupling Control of Contact Forces in Robotic Manipulation
  8. Pathways and mechanisms for catalyzing social impact through Orchestration: Insights from an open social innovation project
  9. University-linked programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and regional development
  10. Differences in psychological strategies of failed and operational business owners in the Fiji Islands
  11. Teaching content and language in the multilingual classroom
  12. Predictive mapping of plant species and communities using GIS and Landsat data in a southern Mongolian mountain range
  13. Crowdsourcing
  14. Transfer of metacognitive skills in self-regulated learning
  15. Effekte unterschiedlicher Kollaborationsskripte in chatbasiertem Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning am Beispiel von Lernprotokollen
  16. Dynamic material flow analysis in the life cycle assessment tool chain
  17. Uncertainty, Pluralism, and the Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm
  18. An Indirectly Controlled Full Variable Valve Train System to Improve the Internal Combustion Phase Engines
  19. The role of learning strategies for performance in mathematics courses for engineers
  20. Developmentalities and donor-NGO relations
  21. Heterogenous activation of dynamic recrystallization and twinning during friction stir processing of a Cu-4Nb alloy
  22. Biodegradability and genotoxicity of surface functionalized colloidal silica (SiO2) particles in the aquatic environment
  23. Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development
  24. Geometric analysis of a laser scanner functioning based on dynamic triangulation
  25. Uncertainty, Pluralism, and the Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm