Non-invariance? An Overstated Problem With Misconceived Causes
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Authors
Scholars study representative international surveys to understand cross-cultural differences in mentality patterns, which are measured via complex multi-item constructs. Methodologists in this field insist with increasing vigor that detecting “non-invariance” in how a construct’s items associate with each other in different national samples is an infallible sign of encultured in-equivalences in how respondents understand the items. Questioning this claim, we demonstrate that a main source of non-invariance is the arithmetic of closed-ended scales in the presence of sample mean disparity. Since arithmetic principles are culture-unspecific, the non-invariance that these principles enforce in statistical terms is inconclusive of encultured in-equivalences in semantic terms. Because of this inconclusiveness, our evidence reveals furthermore that non-invariance is inconsequential for the cross-cultural functioning of multi-item constructs as concerns their nomological linkages to other variables of interest. We discuss the implications of these insights for measurement validation in cross-cultural settings with large sample mean disparity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Sociological Methods and Research |
Number of pages | 33 |
ISSN | 0049-1241 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 24.03.2021 |
- compositional substitutability, emancipative values, item response, measurement equivalence, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis
- Politics