Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Research output: Books and anthologiesMonographsResearch

Standard

Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. / Hirsch, Boris.
Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2010. 259 p. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; No. 639).

Research output: Books and anthologiesMonographsResearch

Harvard

Hirsch, B 2010, Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, no. 639, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

APA

Hirsch, B. (2010). Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; No. 639). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

Vancouver

Hirsch B. Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2010. 259 p. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; 639). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

Bibtex

@book{8f9898ff59304e77a5a292917c598f05,
title = "Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence",
abstract = "This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women{\textquoteright}s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women{\textquoteright}s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men{\textquoteright}s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.",
keywords = "Economics, Discrimination, Gender, Gender Pay Gap, Labour Supply, Monopsony, Nation, women",
author = "Boris Hirsch",
note = "Zugl.: Erlangen-N{\"u}rnberg, Univ., Diss., [2009]",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-642-10408-4",
series = "Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "639",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap

T2 - Theory and Empirical Evidence

AU - Hirsch, Boris

N1 - Zugl.: Erlangen-Nürnberg, Univ., Diss., [2009]

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women’s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women’s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men’s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.

AB - This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women’s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women’s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men’s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.

KW - Economics

KW - Discrimination

KW - Gender

KW - Gender Pay Gap

KW - Labour Supply

KW - Monopsony

KW - Nation

KW - women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960065738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

M3 - Monographs

SN - 978-3-642-10408-4

T3 - Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

BT - Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap

PB - Springer Verlag

CY - Berlin, Heidelberg

ER -

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Engendering Bauhaus Histories. Frauen und Feminität seit den 1920er-Jahren.
  2. Update on legal and policy aspects of mall satellites: sustainability, frequency interference, registration and ownership
  3. Pumps, Sneaker & Budapester: Wissens- & Change-Prozesse beim Schuhhaus Görtz
  4. Perspectives on the Concept of Fashion in Romanticism
  5. Transatlantische Konferenz zur Bedeutung Heiner Müllers im 21. Jahrhundert - IHMG 2014
  6. Natur und Landschaft (Zeitschrift)
  7. Landschaftsmalerei in Nordamerika: Die "Hudson River School" und die "Group of 7"
  8. 12th Annual Conference of the Forum for Business Ethics and Business Culture - 2009
  9. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie (Externe Organisation)
  10. 45th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association - EAA 2023
  11. Exploration des Unsichtbaren: Beobachtungen zu Robert Kochs Mikrophotographie
  12. Was wissen Grundschullehrer und Grundschullehrerinnen über die Graphematik des Deutschen.
  13. Toward an Ecological Critique in Art? On Art Criticism in Times of Ecological Crisis
  14. Wissenschaftskongress der Pluralen Ökonomik - 2013
  15. Werkstattgespräch "Globalisierte Familie: mobil - vielfältig .ambivalent" 2012
  16. Inter-institutional development teams at the ZZL-Netzwerk. Initial teacher education at the Leuphana University of Lüneburg and the university school partnership model at the ZZL-Netzwerk.
  17. Vortrag und Podiumsdiskussion "Staatsbürgerschaft vs. Reichsbürgerschaft"
  18. Arbeitskreistreffen Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme
  19. Carola Giedion-Welcker (1893–1979) and the gendered Language of Sculpture`s Histories
  20. Oxford Said Annual Conference on Professional Service Firms 2016