Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence

Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienMonografienForschung

Standard

Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap : Theory and Empirical Evidence. / Hirsch, Boris.

Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer, 2010. 259 S. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; Nr. 639).

Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienMonografienForschung

Harvard

Hirsch, B 2010, Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Nr. 639, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

APA

Vancouver

Hirsch B. Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010. 259 S. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; 639). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

Bibtex

@book{8f9898ff59304e77a5a292917c598f05,
title = "Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap: Theory and Empirical Evidence",
abstract = "This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women{\textquoteright}s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women{\textquoteright}s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men{\textquoteright}s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.",
keywords = "Economics, Discrimination, Gender, Gender Pay Gap, Labour Supply, Monopsony, Nation, women",
author = "Boris Hirsch",
note = "Zugl.: Erlangen-N{\"u}rnberg, Univ., Diss., [2009]",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-642-10408-4",
series = "Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "639",
address = "Germany",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap

T2 - Theory and Empirical Evidence

AU - Hirsch, Boris

N1 - Zugl.: Erlangen-Nürnberg, Univ., Diss., [2009]

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women’s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women’s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men’s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.

AB - This book investigates models of spatial and dynamic monopsony and their application to the persistent empirical regularity of the gender pay gap. Theoretically, the main conclusion is that employers possess more monopsony power over their female employees if women are less driven by pecuniary considerations in their choice of employers than men. Employers may exploit this to increase their profits at the detriment of women’s wages. Empirically, it is indeed found that women’s labour supply to the firm is less wage-elastic than men’s and that at least a third of the gender pay gap in the data investigated may result from employers engaging in monopsonistic discrimination. Therefore, a monopsonistic approach to gender discrimination in the labour market clearly contributes to the economic understanding of the gender pay gap. It not only provides an intuitively appealing explanation of the gap from standard economic reasoning, but it is also corroborated by empirical observation.

KW - Economics

KW - Discrimination

KW - Gender

KW - Gender Pay Gap

KW - Labour Supply

KW - Monopsony

KW - Nation

KW - women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960065738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-10409-1

M3 - Monographs

SN - 978-3-642-10408-4

T3 - Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

BT - Monopsonistic Labour Markets and the Gender Pay Gap

PB - Springer

CY - Berlin, Heidelberg

ER -

DOI