Mapping social values of ecosystem services: What is behind the map?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Laura Nahuelhual
  • Felipe Benra
  • Fernanda Rojas
  • G. Ignacio Díaz
  • Alejandra Carmona
A growing interest in mapping the social value of ecosystem services (ES) is not yet methodologically aligned with what is actually being mapped. We critically examine aspects of the social value mapping process that might influence map outcomes and limit their practical use in decision making. We rely on an empirical case of participatory mapping, for a single ES (recreation opportunities), which involves diverse stakeholders such as planners, researchers, and community representatives. Value elicitation relied on an individual open-ended interview and a mapping exercise. Interpretation of the narratives and GIS calculations of proximity, centrality, and dispersion helped in exploring the factors driving participants’ answers. Narratives reveal diverse value types. Whereas planners highlighted utilitarian and aesthetic values, the answers from researchers revealed naturalistic values as well. In turn community representatives acknowledged symbolic values. When remitted to the map, these values were constrained to statements toward a much narrower set of features of the physical (e.g., volcanoes) and built landscape (e.g., roads). The results suggest that mapping, as an instrumental approach toward social valuation, may capture only a subset of relevant assigned values. This outcome is the interplay between participants’ characteristics, including their acquaintance with the territory and their ability with maps, and the mapping procedure itself, including the proxies used to represent the ES and the value typology chosen, the elicitation question, the cartographic features displayed on the base map, and the spatial scale.
Original languageEnglish
Article number24
JournalEcology and Society
Volume21
Issue number3
Number of pages13
ISSN1708-3087
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.01.2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the author(s).

    Research areas

  • Ecosystems Research - cultural ecosystem service, recreation opportunities, social value mapping, southern Chile

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Reprocessing from the inside
  2. Towards a Concept for Integrating IT Innovation Management into Business IT Management
  3. Using a decoupling technique to identify the magnetic flux in a permanent magnet synchronous motor
  4. Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right
  5. Synthesizer
  6. System change at National government level
  7. Introduction
  8. Effective digital practice in the competence-oriented English as a foreign language classroom in Germany
  9. Prices, Self-Interests, and the "Invisible Hand" - Reviewing Ethical Foundations of Economic Concepts in Times of Crisis
  10. Governing Emotions
  11. Transzendenz in Beziehung. Zur Diskontinuität der Zeit
  12. The drawback of getting by-implicit imbalances in the educational support of young people in and leaving care in Germany
  13. Fossil Natural Gas Exit – A New Narrative for the European Energy Transformation towards Decarbonization
  14. Grünes Bruderholz
  15. Influence of processing route on the properties of magnesium alloys
  16. Technik ǀ Intimität
  17. Power from the Desert
  18. Teleological Judgment between Racism and its Critique: On the Status of Race in Kant's Work
  19. Praxisphasen in der Lehrerausbildung
  20. German Language Teaching and Learning in Tanzania
  21. VKhUTEMAS at Martin-Gropius-Bau
  22. Migrating Histories of Art
  23. Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression
  24. More effective natural resource management through participatory governance?
  25. The Age of Open Strategic Autonomy
  26. Gene flow across large distances in the cavity-nesting wasp Deuteragenia subintermedia in a central European forest
  27. Verstehen bildnerischer Narrationen in Eltern-Kind-Dialogen
  28. Kulturelle Dimension einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung