Managing sustainability communication on campus: experiences from Lüneburg

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Managing sustainability communication on campus: experiences from Lüneburg. / Franz-Balsen, Angela; Heinrichs, Harald.
In: International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 8, No. 4, 25.09.2007, p. 431 - 445.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b7a3920194dc47ffaa5bb46e667fd8a8,
title = "Managing sustainability communication on campus:: experiences from L{\"u}neburg",
abstract = "Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of L{\"u}neburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Communication, Communication management, Germany, Higher education, Sustainable development",
author = "Angela Franz-Balsen and Harald Heinrichs",
year = "2007",
month = sep,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/14676370710823591",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "431 -- 445",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education",
issn = "1467-6370",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing sustainability communication on campus:

T2 - experiences from Lüneburg

AU - Franz-Balsen, Angela

AU - Heinrichs, Harald

PY - 2007/9/25

Y1 - 2007/9/25

N2 - Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of Lüneburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.

AB - Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of Lüneburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Communication

KW - Communication management

KW - Germany

KW - Higher education

KW - Sustainable development

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1111a9de-0a79-3bc3-a1db-79f663d91434/

U2 - 10.1108/14676370710823591

DO - 10.1108/14676370710823591

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 8

SP - 431

EP - 445

JO - International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

JF - International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

SN - 1467-6370

IS - 4

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Role of SiC in grain refinement of aluminum-free Mg-Zn alloys
  2. The bicultural phenomenon
  3. Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect?
  4. Dada Data
  5. Lucia Moholy’s idle hands
  6. Change-Beneficial Process Architectures and the Human as a Change Enabler
  7. Postretirement Career Planning
  8. Loving the mess
  9. The role of expert feedback in the development of pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management in an online blended learning environment
  10. How do investors react to problematic social issues in organisations?
  11. On inhomogeneous Bernoulli convolutions and random power series
  12. Aufsätze im SMS-Stil?
  13. Das Interface der Selbstverborgenheit
  14. Almost there: On the importance of a comprehensive entrepreneurial ecosystem for developing sustainable urban food forest enterprises
  15. Balibar/Wallerstein's "Race, nation, class"
  16. 'Climate neutral' is a lie - abandon it as a goal
  17. Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
  18. Fenton process on single and mixture components of phenothiazine pharmaceuticals
  19. Scoring im GENO-Bereich
  20. A.3 Altersbezogene Unterschiede bei der Interaktion mit einem Virtual-Reality-System
  21. Emotional knowledge, emotional styles, and religion
  22. Differenzielles Lernen im Golf
  23. Evolution of microstructure and hardness of AE42 alloy after heat treatments
  24. Connecting feedback to self-efficacy
  25. Kein Schaf sein
  26. Emissions of polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, and polychlorinated dibenzofurans during 2010 and 2011 in Zurich, Switzerland
  27. Kooperationspartner, Netzwerke, Stakeholder im Bereich der Elternarbeit
  28. Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Maintenance Measures for Open Landscapes
  29. #3 Unstable Infrastructures
  30. Soziale Tatsachen