Managing sustainability communication on campus: experiences from Lüneburg

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Managing sustainability communication on campus: experiences from Lüneburg. / Franz-Balsen, Angela; Heinrichs, Harald.
in: International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 4, 25.09.2007, S. 431 - 445.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b7a3920194dc47ffaa5bb46e667fd8a8,
title = "Managing sustainability communication on campus:: experiences from L{\"u}neburg",
abstract = "Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of L{\"u}neburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.",
keywords = "Sustainability Science, Communication, Communication management, Germany, Higher education, Sustainable development",
author = "Angela Franz-Balsen and Harald Heinrichs",
year = "2007",
month = sep,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/14676370710823591",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "431 -- 445",
journal = "International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education",
issn = "1467-6370",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing sustainability communication on campus:

T2 - experiences from Lüneburg

AU - Franz-Balsen, Angela

AU - Heinrichs, Harald

PY - 2007/9/25

Y1 - 2007/9/25

N2 - Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of Lüneburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.

AB - Purpose – Sustainability communication is evolving as a new interdisciplinary field of research and professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to point out the advantage of applying theoretical frameworks and related research instruments for an adequate sustainability communication management on campus. It also aims to highlight the normative constraints and challenges (participation) that differentiate sustainability communication from public relations.Design/methodology/approach – An interdisciplinary theoretical framework and empirical studies (quantitative/qualitative; audience research) were used for the design of a context-sensitive sustainability communication management concept for the University of Lüneburg-Findings – Empirical data clearly showed that disciplinary cultures (including their gender specificity) are highly relevant for sustainability attitudes. Continuous visibility of sustainability efforts on campus is critical for people's attitudes and engagement. Campus community members can be characterized by degrees of “sustainability affinity” vs “sustainability distance”. Too much sustainability-campaigning is counterproductive, whereas listening to campus community members' ideas and needs seems appropriate.Research limitations/implications – There is a need for qualitative data to assess “communication culture”Practical implications – A balanced theoretically, empirically and normatively grounded communication management is recommended in order to establish a participatory communication culture.Originality/value – The application of sustainability communication theory, including participation research, in the context of higher education for sustainable development is overdue; thesis: sustainability communication wants to initiate structural changes on campus, but is itself dependent on visible structural change in order to be effective.

KW - Sustainability Science

KW - Communication

KW - Communication management

KW - Germany

KW - Higher education

KW - Sustainable development

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1111a9de-0a79-3bc3-a1db-79f663d91434/

U2 - 10.1108/14676370710823591

DO - 10.1108/14676370710823591

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 8

SP - 431

EP - 445

JO - International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

JF - International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

SN - 1467-6370

IS - 4

ER -

DOI