Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation: State Of The Art, Ein Definitionsvorschlag Und Entwicklungslinien
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Zeitschrift fur Evaluation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2010, p. 49-72.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation
T2 - State Of The Art, Ein Definitionsvorschlag Und Entwicklungslinien
AU - Schmidt, Boris
AU - Loßnitzer, Tim
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - currently being implemented as one important element of the uprising teaching related quality management systems in German higher education institutions. Despite their increasing use, several doubts and reservations remain on the levels of definitions, methods and practical implications. One reason for these reservations can be found in a lack of agreement on behalf of how exactly to design and implement those instruments and procedures used for teaching feedback. The present article identifies six major dimensions of design features for teaching feedback. On this theoretical base, N = 19 questionnaires used in the German speaking higher education area were being assessed by means of content analysis. Results prove that there is a surprisingly wide concordance between the different approaches. Using the combination of those features typically found, a definition of "course evaluation" is being presented as a specific and systematic way of carrying out teaching feedback. As a conclusion, future trends for course evaluations in the context of quality management for study programmes are being outlined.
AB - currently being implemented as one important element of the uprising teaching related quality management systems in German higher education institutions. Despite their increasing use, several doubts and reservations remain on the levels of definitions, methods and practical implications. One reason for these reservations can be found in a lack of agreement on behalf of how exactly to design and implement those instruments and procedures used for teaching feedback. The present article identifies six major dimensions of design features for teaching feedback. On this theoretical base, N = 19 questionnaires used in the German speaking higher education area were being assessed by means of content analysis. Results prove that there is a surprisingly wide concordance between the different approaches. Using the combination of those features typically found, a definition of "course evaluation" is being presented as a specific and systematic way of carrying out teaching feedback. As a conclusion, future trends for course evaluations in the context of quality management for study programmes are being outlined.
KW - Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsmanagement
KW - course evaluation
KW - definition
KW - quality management
KW - student feedback
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953038464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Zeitschriftenaufsätze
AN - SCOPUS:77953038464
VL - 9
SP - 49
EP - 72
JO - Zeitschrift fur Evaluation
JF - Zeitschrift fur Evaluation
SN - 1619-5515
IS - 1
ER -