Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksCritical ReviewsResearch

Authors

After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.
Original languageGerman
Title of host publicationEuropean Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016
EditorsMarc Bungenberg, Christoph Herrmann, Markus Krajewski, Jörg Philipp Terhechte
Number of pages4
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer Nature Switzerland AG
Publication date2016
Pages831-834
ISBN (print)978-3-319-29214-4
ISBN (electronic)978-3-319-29215-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Law - Arbitral Tribunal, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Fierce Debate, Investment Arbitration, Constitutional Question