Juliane Ahner, Investor-Staat-Schiedsverfahren Nach Europäischem Unionsrecht: Zulässigkeit und Ausgestaltung in Investitionsabkommen der Europäischen Union
Research output: Contributions to collected editions/works › Critical Reviews › Research
Authors
After receiving a competence for foreign investments with the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the EU unsurprisingly started to negotiate its own bilateral investment treaties (BITs), including typical investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, in recent years. In this context, especially the EU-Singapore FTA, CETA and TTIP the can be named; all of them basically being trade agreements, but containing distinct investment chapters at the same time. Lately the EU’s BIT-negotiations are accompanied by extensive and fierce debates both in public and in academia, not only regarding the legitimacy of ISDS, but also concerning procedural, institutional and even constitutional questions.
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2016 |
| Editors | Marc Bungenberg, Christoph Herrmann, Markus Krajewski, Jörg Philipp Terhechte |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer Nature Switzerland AG |
| Publication date | 2016 |
| Pages | 831-834 |
| ISBN (print) | 978-3-319-29214-4 |
| ISBN (electronic) | 978-3-319-29215-1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
- Law - Arbitral Tribunal, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Fierce Debate, Investment Arbitration, Constitutional Question