Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands: Revisited and refined
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 70, 01.01.2018, p. 479 - 484.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands
T2 - Revisited and refined
AU - Engler, John Oliver
AU - von Wehrden, Henrik
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - We re-investigate evidence for the non-equilibrium concept for rangelands using a georeferenced data base of N = 83 studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Following up on a previous study by von Wehrden et al. (2012), we use their global map of rainfall variability and their method to distinguish between three different types of degradation depending on the presence or absence of water sources or key resources in the studied areas. Addressing recent discussions in the rangeland science community, we include the distinction between commercial or subsistence use as parameter in our data base. We find that zonal degradation, i.e. degradation with no presence of water or key resources, is predominantly reported for locations with a precipitation coefficient of variation below the threshold of 33%, as proposed by the non-equilibrium concept. We do not find any statistical evidence for a systematic difference between commercial and subsistence farming in terms of degradation incidence.
AB - We re-investigate evidence for the non-equilibrium concept for rangelands using a georeferenced data base of N = 83 studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Following up on a previous study by von Wehrden et al. (2012), we use their global map of rainfall variability and their method to distinguish between three different types of degradation depending on the presence or absence of water sources or key resources in the studied areas. Addressing recent discussions in the rangeland science community, we include the distinction between commercial or subsistence use as parameter in our data base. We find that zonal degradation, i.e. degradation with no presence of water or key resources, is predominantly reported for locations with a precipitation coefficient of variation below the threshold of 33%, as proposed by the non-equilibrium concept. We do not find any statistical evidence for a systematic difference between commercial and subsistence farming in terms of degradation incidence.
KW - Climatic variability
KW - Commercial farming
KW - Degradation
KW - Drylands
KW - Grazing
KW - Rainfall
KW - Rangeland management
KW - Subsistence farming
KW - Sustainability Science
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034776675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.026
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.026
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85034776675
VL - 70
SP - 479
EP - 484
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
SN - 0264-8377
ER -