Piloting Citizen Science Methods to Measure Perceptions of Carbon Footprint and Energy Content of Food

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Beth Armstrong
  • Gemma Bridge
  • Libby Oakden
  • Christian Reynolds
  • Changqiong Wang
  • Luca A. Panzone
  • Ximena Schmidt Rivera
  • Astrid Kause
  • Charles Ffoulkes
  • Coleman Krawczyk
  • Grant Miller
  • Stephen Serjeant

There is a food knowledge disconnect between the food research community, and the general population. Food experts know detailed information about foods, but there is a lack of understanding about what citizens know. Citizen science has been used successfully in various fields however, is virtually absent from food research. This pilot study explores the efficacy of Zooniverse citizen science platform as a method of food citizen research, and assesses the impact of response method, food type, portion size and weight information, on estimates of carbon footprint and energy content. Estimates of the carbon footprint (grams of carbon dioxide equivalent) and energy content (Kcal) of 10 foods were measured in a 3 (Between: Response Method; multiple-choice, slider, text box) × 3 (Within: portion size; small, medium, large) × 2 (Between: weight information; present, absent) observational survey. Citizens (N = ~516, unique IP addresses) were recruited via informal email networks. Kruskal–Wallis and Chi-square analyses compared citizen estimations with validated values, and assessed the impact of the variables on estimations. The majority of carbon footprint and energy content estimates were inaccurate, with citizens typically overestimating values. We observe an unexpected correlation between carbon footprint and energy content estimates. Portion size impacts perceptions, with estimations increasing with larger portion sizes. Weight information impacts perceptions, with estimations of carbon footprint being lower, and estimates of energy content being higher when weight information is present. Input method significantly affects observed values, estimates of carbon footprint and energy content estimates were lowest using the text box, followed by the slider tool, highest estimates were given using multiple choice. Citizens are unable to accurately estimate the carbon footprint and energy content of foods, though citizens may possess understanding of the hierarchy of values. These compelling findings highlight the need for consumer education, with a focus on carbon footprint, to precede interventions intended to move consumers toward more sustainable and healthy diets. We have demonstrated that citizen science can be used to measure food carbon footprint and energy content perceptions, and the slider tool offers greater sensitivity of estimation and functionality than other input methods.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120
JournalFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Volume4
Number of pages10
ISSN2571-581X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21.08.2020
Externally publishedYes

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Demand-side strategy and business models
  2. Auf allen Märkten zu Hause
  3. Modeling Interregional Patient Mobility: Theory and Evidence from Spatially Explicit Data
  4. Insect decline in forests depends on species’ traits and may be mitigated by management
  5. Corrigendum to: Pathways to Implementation: Evidence on How Participation in Environmental Governance Impacts on Environmental Outcomes
  6. Imagination and imaginaries of sustainability in cultural and artistic practices
  7. Reflecting on the Roles and Skill Sets of Designers and Design Researchers
  8. Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice
  9. Erratum
  10. Students’ own and perceived teacher reference norms
  11. System Properties Determine Food Security and Biodiversity Outcomes at Landscape Scale
  12. Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerkooperation an Gemeinschaftsschulen
  13. Phonographie
  14. Die Liebe der Soziologie
  15. Responsivity
  16. Impact of high carbon amendments and pre-crops on soil bacterial communities
  17. Measurement estimation in primary school
  18. Von der Beharrlichkeit der Ungleichheit
  19. Fehr on Human Altruism (Editorial)
  20. The impacts of rare disasters on asset returns and risk premiums in advanced economies (1870–2015)
  21. § 25 Übergangsregelung für Tarifverträge
  22. Alice über Grenzen
  23. Long-term drought triggers severe declines in carabid beetles in a temperate forest
  24. A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure
  25. Sustainability-oriented targets in executive compensation – symbolic measures or significant catalyst for a sustainable transition?
  26. The strength of vertical linkages
  27. Shock as a black box 2. Effects of adiabatic deceleration and convection included
  28. Article 72 CISG
  29. Editorial
  30. When history matters
  31. The impact of mindfulness on the wellbeing and performance of educators
  32. Werbung
  33. Transformative education
  34. Where is cinema (today)?
  35. Q SGB
  36. Developing sufficiency-oriented offerings for clothing users
  37. C.S.ルイス 「ライオンと魔女」の謎を解く―ナルニアガイド
  38. Imagology Meets Children's Literature
  39. Der Zentrale Runde Tisch der DDR: Wortprotokoll und Dokumente
  40. How to make universal, voluntary testing for COVID-19 work? A behavioural economics perspective
  41. Intentionalisten vs. Strukturalisten
  42. ONYA - The Wellbeing Game:
  43. How do conflicts impact change in family businesses?
  44. El sistema proporcional de composició mixta d'Alemanya