Existential theology

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Standard

Existential theology. / Grossmann, Andreas.
Phenomenology: Responses and Developments. ed. / Leonard Lawlor. Vol. 4 Taylor and Francis Inc., 2014. p. 177-194.

Research output: Contributions to collected editions/worksChapterpeer-review

Harvard

Grossmann, A 2014, Existential theology. in L Lawlor (ed.), Phenomenology: Responses and Developments. vol. 4, Taylor and Francis Inc., pp. 177-194. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729763

APA

Grossmann, A. (2014). Existential theology. In L. Lawlor (Ed.), Phenomenology: Responses and Developments (Vol. 4, pp. 177-194). Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729763

Vancouver

Grossmann A. Existential theology. In Lawlor L, editor, Phenomenology: Responses and Developments. Vol. 4. Taylor and Francis Inc. 2014. p. 177-194 doi: 10.4324/9781315729763

Bibtex

@inbook{147aa4d614c94d75b5fc6c0220b2c7cb,
title = "Existential theology",
abstract = "One of the noteworthy consequences of Husserlian phenomenology was that it gave rise to quite divergent philosophical developments and elaborations in the work of his students. is applies in particular to the religious-philosophical projects of Edith Stein1 and Martin Heidegger. Stein, Husserl{\textquoteright}s private assistant, born Jewish and a convert to Roman Catholicism in 1922, attempted to1. Edith Stein (October 12, 1891-August 9, 1942; born in Breslau (Wroclaw), Poland; died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp) was educated at the University of G{\"o}ttingen (doctorate, 1916). Her in uences included Catholic theology (Aquinas) and mysticism (Teresa of {\'A}vila), Heidegger, and Husserl. She held appointments at the Universities of Freiburg (1916-19) and G{\"o}ttingen (1919-22), Dominican Girls School, Speyer, Germany (1922-32), Discalced“Christian philosophy” (oriented by Catholicism) is supposed to nd its ful llment in theology, but without conceiving itself as theology and without making theological claims.2 In contrast, Heidegger, who followed her as Husserl{\textquoteright}s assistant, grew out of Catholicism to advocate a fundamental methodical atheism in philosophy, rejecting Christian philosophy, in “Phenomenology and eology” (1927/28), as an impossibility, as a “square circle.”3 For Heidegger, unlike Stein, theology requires philosophy, namely, as a “guiding corrective”; philosophy, however, in no way requires theology in order to be philosophy.4 How can the speci city of these disparate options, which ultimately are mutually exclusive, be more closely determined? e resolution of this question is important. In fact, it will be shown that the disagreement that emerged between Stein and Heidegger in the question of a “Christian philosophy” marks something like a foundational rupture and, at the same time, a basic structure in the eld of debates presented here.",
keywords = "Philosophy",
author = "Andreas Grossmann",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315729763",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781844652143",
volume = "4",
pages = "177--194",
editor = "Leonard Lawlor",
booktitle = "Phenomenology",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Existential theology

AU - Grossmann, Andreas

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - One of the noteworthy consequences of Husserlian phenomenology was that it gave rise to quite divergent philosophical developments and elaborations in the work of his students. is applies in particular to the religious-philosophical projects of Edith Stein1 and Martin Heidegger. Stein, Husserl’s private assistant, born Jewish and a convert to Roman Catholicism in 1922, attempted to1. Edith Stein (October 12, 1891-August 9, 1942; born in Breslau (Wroclaw), Poland; died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp) was educated at the University of Göttingen (doctorate, 1916). Her in uences included Catholic theology (Aquinas) and mysticism (Teresa of Ávila), Heidegger, and Husserl. She held appointments at the Universities of Freiburg (1916-19) and Göttingen (1919-22), Dominican Girls School, Speyer, Germany (1922-32), Discalced“Christian philosophy” (oriented by Catholicism) is supposed to nd its ful llment in theology, but without conceiving itself as theology and without making theological claims.2 In contrast, Heidegger, who followed her as Husserl’s assistant, grew out of Catholicism to advocate a fundamental methodical atheism in philosophy, rejecting Christian philosophy, in “Phenomenology and eology” (1927/28), as an impossibility, as a “square circle.”3 For Heidegger, unlike Stein, theology requires philosophy, namely, as a “guiding corrective”; philosophy, however, in no way requires theology in order to be philosophy.4 How can the speci city of these disparate options, which ultimately are mutually exclusive, be more closely determined? e resolution of this question is important. In fact, it will be shown that the disagreement that emerged between Stein and Heidegger in the question of a “Christian philosophy” marks something like a foundational rupture and, at the same time, a basic structure in the eld of debates presented here.

AB - One of the noteworthy consequences of Husserlian phenomenology was that it gave rise to quite divergent philosophical developments and elaborations in the work of his students. is applies in particular to the religious-philosophical projects of Edith Stein1 and Martin Heidegger. Stein, Husserl’s private assistant, born Jewish and a convert to Roman Catholicism in 1922, attempted to1. Edith Stein (October 12, 1891-August 9, 1942; born in Breslau (Wroclaw), Poland; died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp) was educated at the University of Göttingen (doctorate, 1916). Her in uences included Catholic theology (Aquinas) and mysticism (Teresa of Ávila), Heidegger, and Husserl. She held appointments at the Universities of Freiburg (1916-19) and Göttingen (1919-22), Dominican Girls School, Speyer, Germany (1922-32), Discalced“Christian philosophy” (oriented by Catholicism) is supposed to nd its ful llment in theology, but without conceiving itself as theology and without making theological claims.2 In contrast, Heidegger, who followed her as Husserl’s assistant, grew out of Catholicism to advocate a fundamental methodical atheism in philosophy, rejecting Christian philosophy, in “Phenomenology and eology” (1927/28), as an impossibility, as a “square circle.”3 For Heidegger, unlike Stein, theology requires philosophy, namely, as a “guiding corrective”; philosophy, however, in no way requires theology in order to be philosophy.4 How can the speci city of these disparate options, which ultimately are mutually exclusive, be more closely determined? e resolution of this question is important. In fact, it will be shown that the disagreement that emerged between Stein and Heidegger in the question of a “Christian philosophy” marks something like a foundational rupture and, at the same time, a basic structure in the eld of debates presented here.

KW - Philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955744804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315729763

DO - 10.4324/9781315729763

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84955744804

SN - 9781844652143

VL - 4

SP - 177

EP - 194

BT - Phenomenology

A2 - Lawlor, Leonard

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Researchers

  1. Eckhard Bollow

Publications

  1. Training of student teaching assistants and e-learning via math-bridge-Two projects at the German Centre for Higher Mathematics Education
  2. Effects of free air CO2 enrichment on root growth of barley, sugar beet and wheat grown in a rotation under different nitrogen supply
  3. Racist mobilisation and sexualisation in the ‘refugee debate’ in Germany
  4. Einleitung
  5. Mobile cognitive therapy
  6. Autonomie der Migration
  7. Simulationsbasierte Optimierung der Reihenfolgeplanung am Beispiel eines Liniensorters in der Automobilindustrie
  8. A theoretical framework to support green agripreneurship avoiding greenwashing
  9. Das Werk des Staatsminsters
  10. “Who needs money if you got hands, if you got plants” Forming community resilience in two urban gardening networks in South Africa
  11. Marina F. Bykova, Kenneth R. Westphal (Hrsg.) The Palgrave Hegel Handbook
  12. Ecophysiological isotope tools for characterising the drought sensitivity of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb. Franco)
  13. The Development of a Global Fashion Firm through the Management of an International Production and Sales Network
  14. Teacher Education for Sustainable Development
  15. Förderung von Gesundheitskompetenzen mit Location-based Games. Eine partizipative Entwicklung
  16. Effects of Sn segregation and precipitates on creep response of Mg-Sn alloys
  17. Was richtet den Wertekompass?
  18. Public Attention, Political Action: The Example of Environmental Regulation
  19. Wie trägt die Berufsbildung zu einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung bei?
  20. Health related quality of life of a tertiary referral center population with urinary incontinence using the DCGM-10 questionnaire
  21. Zoning of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves
  22. Germany
  23. Antibiotics for Human Use
  24. Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalence scales
  25. Values and Corruption
  26. Transcultural Science from the Perspective of international Organisations
  27. Schulpraxis als Lerngelegenheit?
  28. Empirische Arbeit
  29. Staatsorganisation
  30. The registrar of companies
  31. Kommunalpolitik
  32. Strategien entwickeln