Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services. / García-Nieto, Ana P.; Huland, Elias; Quintas-Soriano, Cristina et al.
In: Ecosystems and People, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.11.2019, p. 257-268.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

García-Nieto, AP, Huland, E, Quintas-Soriano, C, Iniesta-Arandia, I, García-Llorente, M, Palomo, I & Martín-López, B 2019, 'Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services', Ecosystems and People, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875

APA

García-Nieto, A. P., Huland, E., Quintas-Soriano, C., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., & Martín-López, B. (2019). Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People, 15(1), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875

Vancouver

García-Nieto AP, Huland E, Quintas-Soriano C, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I et al. Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People. 2019 Nov 1;15(1):257-268. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875

Bibtex

@article{d0e5993135824183bf956ce5f6885089,
title = "Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown the opportunities and limitations of participatory mapping for ecosystem services management, although it is an incipient research area. One of the research questions yet to be addressed is whether the composition of stakeholder groups has an effect on the outputs of participatory mapping. In this study, we assessed the influence of group composition on the mapped spatial distribution of ecosystem services. We developed two participatory mapping workshops of the ecosystem service supply and demand in the Nacimiento Watershed (Andalusia, Spain). In workshop 1, stakeholders were uniformly grouped according to their level of influence on land management. In workshop 2, we created mixed groups, with participants having dissimilar levels of influence on land management. The strategy of the second workshop aimed to foster social learning among participants, which was expected to influence the mapping outputs. We compared the outputs regarding the mapped spatial distribution of the ecosystem service supply and demand between the two workshops. Our results suggest that social learning occurred in groups with a mixed composition of participants, affecting the mapped spatial distribution of the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Finally, we discuss that knowledge exchange among participants can be supported through deliberative processes that occur in participatory settings, when stakeholders have different degrees of influence on land management. This can also enrich the assessment of the distribution of ecosystem services.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Deliberation, landscape management, participatory GIS, stakeholder diversity, workshop, knowledge exchange",
author = "Garc{\'i}a-Nieto, {Ana P.} and Elias Huland and Cristina Quintas-Soriano and Irene Iniesta-Arandia and Marina Garc{\'i}a-Llorente and Ignacio Palomo and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, {\textcopyright} 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "257--268",
journal = "Ecosystems and People",
issn = "2639-5908",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services

AU - García-Nieto, Ana P.

AU - Huland, Elias

AU - Quintas-Soriano, Cristina

AU - Iniesta-Arandia, Irene

AU - García-Llorente, Marina

AU - Palomo, Ignacio

AU - Martín-López, Berta

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Recent studies have shown the opportunities and limitations of participatory mapping for ecosystem services management, although it is an incipient research area. One of the research questions yet to be addressed is whether the composition of stakeholder groups has an effect on the outputs of participatory mapping. In this study, we assessed the influence of group composition on the mapped spatial distribution of ecosystem services. We developed two participatory mapping workshops of the ecosystem service supply and demand in the Nacimiento Watershed (Andalusia, Spain). In workshop 1, stakeholders were uniformly grouped according to their level of influence on land management. In workshop 2, we created mixed groups, with participants having dissimilar levels of influence on land management. The strategy of the second workshop aimed to foster social learning among participants, which was expected to influence the mapping outputs. We compared the outputs regarding the mapped spatial distribution of the ecosystem service supply and demand between the two workshops. Our results suggest that social learning occurred in groups with a mixed composition of participants, affecting the mapped spatial distribution of the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Finally, we discuss that knowledge exchange among participants can be supported through deliberative processes that occur in participatory settings, when stakeholders have different degrees of influence on land management. This can also enrich the assessment of the distribution of ecosystem services.

AB - Recent studies have shown the opportunities and limitations of participatory mapping for ecosystem services management, although it is an incipient research area. One of the research questions yet to be addressed is whether the composition of stakeholder groups has an effect on the outputs of participatory mapping. In this study, we assessed the influence of group composition on the mapped spatial distribution of ecosystem services. We developed two participatory mapping workshops of the ecosystem service supply and demand in the Nacimiento Watershed (Andalusia, Spain). In workshop 1, stakeholders were uniformly grouped according to their level of influence on land management. In workshop 2, we created mixed groups, with participants having dissimilar levels of influence on land management. The strategy of the second workshop aimed to foster social learning among participants, which was expected to influence the mapping outputs. We compared the outputs regarding the mapped spatial distribution of the ecosystem service supply and demand between the two workshops. Our results suggest that social learning occurred in groups with a mixed composition of participants, affecting the mapped spatial distribution of the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Finally, we discuss that knowledge exchange among participants can be supported through deliberative processes that occur in participatory settings, when stakeholders have different degrees of influence on land management. This can also enrich the assessment of the distribution of ecosystem services.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Deliberation

KW - landscape management

KW - participatory GIS

KW - stakeholder diversity

KW - workshop

KW - knowledge exchange

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073967774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/73328f98-a8d7-3cbc-8873-31de3064e8f2/

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 15

SP - 257

EP - 268

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Multibody simulations of distributed flight arrays for Industry 4.0 applications
  2. Human development as a general theory of social change
  3. Emotion Regulation of Car Drivers by the Physical and Psychological Parameters of Music
  4. Software der Zukunft
  5. No time for smokescreen skepticism
  6. Optimal grazing management rules in semi-arid rangelands with uncertain rainfall
  7. Trust Centrality in Online Social Networks
  8. Enhancing Information Governance with Enterprise Architecture Management
  9. Blended learning
  10. Peopling Europe through Data Practices
  11. Path dependence of accountants: Why are they not involved in corporate sustainability?
  12. The Use of Media in Intercultural Dialogue "dialogo_dialog"!
  13. A target costing approach to developing an online distribution channel
  14. Dynamicland
  15. Effectiveness of a web-based intervention for injured claimants
  16. Im Netz der Dinge
  17. Towards a Critique of Social Networking
  18. Decentralized planning and control for assembly areas driven by Gentelligent® parts
  19. Simulations in Science Education - Status Quo
  20. Friction riveting of 3D printed polyamide 6 with AA 6056-T6
  21. Fictions of the Possible
  22. Keep calm and follow the news
  23. A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect
  24. Notting Hill Gate 4 Basic
  25. Gamification as twenty-first-century ideology
  26. Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities
  27. Donor Upgrading Strategies
  28. Designing an AI Governance Framework
  29. Wissenschaftskommunikation wissenschaftlich arbeitender Psycholog_innen im deutschsprachigen Raum