Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices. / Baumgärtner, Stefan; Glotzbach, Stefanie; Hoberg, Nikolai et al.
In: Intergenerational Justice Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 4-9.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c73ccef3d54b477c89f03a548f1b26fa,
title = "Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices",
abstract = "We argue that economics – as the scientific method of analysing trade-offs – can be helpful (and may even be indispensable) for assessing the trade-offs between intergenerational and intragenerational justice. Economic analysis can delineate the “opportunity set” of politics with respect to the two normative objectives of inter- and intragenerational justice, i.e. it can describe which outcomes are feasible in achieving the two objectives in a given context, and which are not. It can distinguish efficient from inefficient uses of instruments of justice. It can identify the “opportunity cost” of attaining one justice to a higher degree, in terms of less achievement of the other. We find that, under very general conditions, (1) efficiency in the use of instruments of justice implies that there is rivalry between the two justices and the opportunity cost of either justice is positive; (2) negative opportunity costs of achieving one justice exist if there is facilitation between the two justices, which can only happen if instruments of justice are used inefficiently; (3) opportunity costs of achieving one justice are zero if the two justices are independent of each other, which is the case in the interior of the opportunity set where instruments of justice are used inefficiently.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, Economics",
author = "Stefan Baumg{\"a}rtner and Stefanie Glotzbach and Nikolai Hoberg and Quaas, {Martin F.} and Stumpf, {Klara Helene}",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
doi = "10.24357/igjr.6.1.459",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "4--9",
journal = "Intergenerational Justice Review",
issn = "2190-6335",
publisher = "Stiftung fuer die Rechte Zukuenftiger Generationen",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices

AU - Baumgärtner, Stefan

AU - Glotzbach, Stefanie

AU - Hoberg, Nikolai

AU - Quaas, Martin F.

AU - Stumpf, Klara Helene

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - We argue that economics – as the scientific method of analysing trade-offs – can be helpful (and may even be indispensable) for assessing the trade-offs between intergenerational and intragenerational justice. Economic analysis can delineate the “opportunity set” of politics with respect to the two normative objectives of inter- and intragenerational justice, i.e. it can describe which outcomes are feasible in achieving the two objectives in a given context, and which are not. It can distinguish efficient from inefficient uses of instruments of justice. It can identify the “opportunity cost” of attaining one justice to a higher degree, in terms of less achievement of the other. We find that, under very general conditions, (1) efficiency in the use of instruments of justice implies that there is rivalry between the two justices and the opportunity cost of either justice is positive; (2) negative opportunity costs of achieving one justice exist if there is facilitation between the two justices, which can only happen if instruments of justice are used inefficiently; (3) opportunity costs of achieving one justice are zero if the two justices are independent of each other, which is the case in the interior of the opportunity set where instruments of justice are used inefficiently.

AB - We argue that economics – as the scientific method of analysing trade-offs – can be helpful (and may even be indispensable) for assessing the trade-offs between intergenerational and intragenerational justice. Economic analysis can delineate the “opportunity set” of politics with respect to the two normative objectives of inter- and intragenerational justice, i.e. it can describe which outcomes are feasible in achieving the two objectives in a given context, and which are not. It can distinguish efficient from inefficient uses of instruments of justice. It can identify the “opportunity cost” of attaining one justice to a higher degree, in terms of less achievement of the other. We find that, under very general conditions, (1) efficiency in the use of instruments of justice implies that there is rivalry between the two justices and the opportunity cost of either justice is positive; (2) negative opportunity costs of achieving one justice exist if there is facilitation between the two justices, which can only happen if instruments of justice are used inefficiently; (3) opportunity costs of achieving one justice are zero if the two justices are independent of each other, which is the case in the interior of the opportunity set where instruments of justice are used inefficiently.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - Economics

U2 - 10.24357/igjr.6.1.459

DO - 10.24357/igjr.6.1.459

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 6

SP - 4

EP - 9

JO - Intergenerational Justice Review

JF - Intergenerational Justice Review

SN - 2190-6335

IS - 1

ER -

Documents

DOI