Does money "buy" tolerance toward damage-causing wildlife?

Research output: Journal contributionsConference article in journalResearchpeer-review

Authors

The Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area supports large-scale migrations of wildlife that occur in a mixed agri-conservation landscape in five Southern African countries. Human-Wildlife Conflict is a key challenge and understanding the drivers of communities' willingness to coexist with wildlife is thus critical. Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) is a widely used economic approach to foster human-wildlife coexistence with the assumption that monetary benefits can "buy" tolerance by offsetting the disservices of living with wildlife. We tested this assumption and hypothesized that Namibians would be more tolerant towards wildlife than Zambians because they received higher monetary benefits from wildlife. We used the Wildlife Tolerance Model (WTM) as the framework to define tolerance and identify tolerance drivers. We found Namibians tolerance was higher for lion, elephant and hyena but not for kudu and baboon. After controlling for confounding variables of the WTM that could potentially explain differences in tolerance, contrary to expectation, the monetary benefits did not account for higher Namibian tolerance. Instead, only nonmonetary benefits explained the higher tolerance. We used crowding theory to explain this finding, proposing that CBNRM in Namibia and the monetary benefits from the program "crowd in" intrinsic motivation to appreciate and tolerate wildlife.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere262
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume3
Issue number3
Number of pages16
ISSN2578-4854
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2021

Bibliographical note

We thank the VolkswagenStiftung for funding this study as a postdoctoral fellowship to R. Kansky. We also thank the following people for assistance and support during the project: Shylock Muyenga for assistance with electronic data collection programing, Kabika Kumoyo, Mubita Nyambe, Brian Mulomba, Gift Muyamba, Inyambo Imakando for assistance with translating, piloting and survey interviews in Zambia, Alice Poniso, Daryl Mwilima, Rikki Matengu, Simasiku Mwanangombe, and Image Katangu for conducting survey interviews in Namibia, Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia and Zambia Wildlife authority for research permission to work in their countries, Dr. Klinghoeffer and the Department of Wildlife Management and Tourism at University of Namibia and IRDNC with assistance, support and introductions to communities in Zambezi region and Liwena Sitali from KAZA and Mr. Nyambe from Peace Parks with assistance, support and introductions to communities in Zambia. Special thanks to the farmers and community members for their participation and willingness to take part in the surveys.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology

    Research areas

  • benefits, coexistence, community based natural resource management, costs, crowding theory, governance, human-wildlife conflict wildlife, social ecological system values, wildlife tolerance model
  • Environmental planning
  • Ecosystems Research

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Affect and stock returns
  2. Deformation microstructures and textures of cast Mg-3Sn-2Ca alloy under uniaxial hot compression
  3. Stratification of stakeholders for participation in the governance of coastal social-ecological systems
  4. Exports and Productivity Growth
  5. Patient Positioning in Radiotherapy
  6. Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect?
  7. On inhomogeneous Bernoulli convolutions and random power series
  8. Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming
  9. Reduced nitrate leaching from an Irish cropland soil under non-inversion tillage with cover cropping greatly outweighs increased dissolved organic nitrogen leaching
  10. How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands
  11. Towards a green and sustainable fruit waste valorisation model in Brazil
  12. “Sposi, Amici, al ballo, al gioco!”
  13. Was erklärt hohe Arbeitseinkommen der Selbstständigen?
  14. UK Unionism and Innovative Activity: Some Cautionary Remarks on the Basis of a Simple Cross-Country Test
  15. Antidepressants
  16. Sustainable management of marine fish stocks by means of sliding mode control
  17. The difficulty to behave as a (regulated) natural monopolist
  18. Factorial Validity of the Anxiety Questionnaire for Students (AFS)
  19. Die Bewertung des Informationssystems einer Unternehmung
  20. Multidimensional Time and Income Poverty
  21. Plant species diversity and endemism on islands and archipelagos, with special reference to the Macaronesian Islands
  22. GETT-QA
  23. Working time preferences and early and late retirement intentions
  24. Anspannung
  25. Simultantestprozedur für globale Nullhypothesen bei beliebiger Abhängigkeitsstruktur der Einzeltests
  26. Assessing Printability Maps in Additive Manufacturing of Metal Alloys
  27. Updating inflation expectations
  28. Climate Policy Cooperation Games between Developed and Developing Nations
  29. Pollination of apple variaties across Europe: Dependecy on cross pollination and visitor communities
  30. Sliding Mode Control and Observer-Based Disturbance Compensation for a Permanent Magnet Linear Motor