Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks? / Dammann, Lena; Heine, Lena; Leiss, Dominik et al.
In: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol. 19, No. 4, em0791, 11.2024.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{260a26f399f44febb3c54b8d4e024ca2,
title = "Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?",
abstract = "Previous studies suggest that sentence-linking elements, like connectives, enhance text comprehension since they help produce a context of meaning. However, there is no evidence yet on whether connectives influence the understanding and solving of reality-based mathematical tasks. In this study, reality-based tasks were varied to create two versions with identical content, differing only in whether coherence relations were expressed explicitly by connectives or implicitly. The investigation aimed to determine if this variation affected students{\textquoteright} ability to comprehend the described situation and solve mathematical tasks based on the provided information. Initial results indicate that connectives do increase the rate of correct answers to comprehension questions, particularly for students with lower linguistic skills. Nevertheless, the use of connectives did not significantly influence mathematical task performance. This suggests that while connectives aid in understanding and organizing information, they may not contribute to students translating this advantage into improved mathematical task outcomes.",
keywords = "Didactics of Mathematics, language and mathematics, modelling tasks, Coherence, Connectives, Comprehension, Linguistic features, language and mathematics, modelling tasks, coherence, connectives, comprehension, Linguistic features, Language Studies, language and mathematics, modelling tasks, Coherence, Connectives, Comprehension, Linguistic features",
author = "Lena Dammann and Lena Heine and Dominik Leiss and Timo Ehmke",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 by Author/s.",
year = "2024",
month = nov,
doi = "10.29333/iejme/15080",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education",
issn = "1306-3030",
publisher = "Modestum Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do connectives improve the level of understandability in mathematical reality-based tasks?

AU - Dammann, Lena

AU - Heine, Lena

AU - Leiss, Dominik

AU - Ehmke, Timo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 by Author/s.

PY - 2024/11

Y1 - 2024/11

N2 - Previous studies suggest that sentence-linking elements, like connectives, enhance text comprehension since they help produce a context of meaning. However, there is no evidence yet on whether connectives influence the understanding and solving of reality-based mathematical tasks. In this study, reality-based tasks were varied to create two versions with identical content, differing only in whether coherence relations were expressed explicitly by connectives or implicitly. The investigation aimed to determine if this variation affected students’ ability to comprehend the described situation and solve mathematical tasks based on the provided information. Initial results indicate that connectives do increase the rate of correct answers to comprehension questions, particularly for students with lower linguistic skills. Nevertheless, the use of connectives did not significantly influence mathematical task performance. This suggests that while connectives aid in understanding and organizing information, they may not contribute to students translating this advantage into improved mathematical task outcomes.

AB - Previous studies suggest that sentence-linking elements, like connectives, enhance text comprehension since they help produce a context of meaning. However, there is no evidence yet on whether connectives influence the understanding and solving of reality-based mathematical tasks. In this study, reality-based tasks were varied to create two versions with identical content, differing only in whether coherence relations were expressed explicitly by connectives or implicitly. The investigation aimed to determine if this variation affected students’ ability to comprehend the described situation and solve mathematical tasks based on the provided information. Initial results indicate that connectives do increase the rate of correct answers to comprehension questions, particularly for students with lower linguistic skills. Nevertheless, the use of connectives did not significantly influence mathematical task performance. This suggests that while connectives aid in understanding and organizing information, they may not contribute to students translating this advantage into improved mathematical task outcomes.

KW - Didactics of Mathematics

KW - language and mathematics

KW - modelling tasks

KW - Coherence

KW - Connectives

KW - Comprehension

KW - Linguistic features

KW - language and mathematics

KW - modelling tasks

KW - coherence

KW - connectives

KW - comprehension

KW - Linguistic features

KW - Language Studies

KW - language and mathematics

KW - modelling tasks

KW - Coherence

KW - Connectives

KW - Comprehension

KW - Linguistic features

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204401194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3f95081c-9fc2-367f-aa50-40b0c6b5baa5/

U2 - 10.29333/iejme/15080

DO - 10.29333/iejme/15080

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 19

JO - International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

JF - International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

SN - 1306-3030

IS - 4

M1 - em0791

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Activities

  1. Where To Start? Exploring 1-Year-Students’ Preconceptions of Sustainable Development
  2. Foresters understanding of forest nature and its gender
  3. Harvard Universität
  4. 131st MLA Annual Convention 2016
  5. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops 2009
  6. 19th Annual SemFest
  7. The hands that steer us: Notes from an ethnography of software developers
  8. Bacillus pseudofirmus AL-89: A source for industrial relevant proteases
  9. Modelling Ecosystem Services - 2009
  10. 23rd (EC)2 Conference - Hypothesis Testing - EC2 2012
  11. UV photodegradation of trimipramine under different environmental variables and chemical nature of aqueous solution - biodegradation and LC-MSn characterization of the formed transformation products
  12. Eigenzeiten of Creativity – Temporal Work as a Coordination Challenge in Artistic and Scientific Project Ecologies
  13. Transdisciplinary Evaluation of Different Coastal Adaptation Strategies: Integrating Regional Perceptions of Scientists, Practitioners and the Public
  14. Student Gender and Teachers' Grading and Written Feedback on Math or Language Assignments
  15. Prototyping in der transdisziplinären Teamarbeit
  16. Video or Text Cases in Problem-Oriented or Direct Instructional Settings for Preservice Teachers?
  17. Group Decision and Negotiation (Fachzeitschrift)
  18. The Rhetoric of Disillusionment. Discursive Shifts in the Rhetoric of "There is no alternative"
  19. Building Collective Institutional Infrastructures for Decent Platform Work: The Development of a Crowdwork Agreement in Germany
  20. It’s hard to part with gains, but what about losses. Contribution and Distribution of Benefits and Burdens in Integrative Negotiations
  21. 18th International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning - 2010 (Veranstaltung)
  22. Containing and Accomodating Salafism in the Sahel: Insights and Lessons from Niger
  23. Designmethoden in transdisziplinären Teams
  24. Social Entrepreneurship - an introduction: ERASMUS guest lecture
  25. The Influence of Media-Politics-Parallelism on Political Participation and Pluralism
  26. Founding moral theory: a Meillassouxian perspective on Kant’s postulate problem
  27. From sensors and trajectories to transport and mixing
  28. It’s hard to part with gains, but what about losses. Contribution and Distribution of Benefits and Burdens in Integrative Negotiations