Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches

Isabel Díaz-Reviriego; Mario Torralba; Beatriz Vizuete; Stefan Ortiz-Przychodzka; Jasmine Pearson; Claudia Heindorf; Aymara LLanque Zonta; Elisa Oteros-Rozas

doi:10.1002/pan3.10673

Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Standard

Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches. / Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel; Torralba, Mario; Vizuete, Beatriz et al.
In: People and Nature, Vol. 6, No. 4, 08.2024, p. 1394-1406.

Research output: Journal contributions › Scientific review articles › Research

Bibtex

@article{4c8065ee3ced43339fd2a46777bcedc2,

title = "Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches",

abstract = "Advancing research and practice that recognize diverse worldviews, knowledge systems, and value orientations is essential to enable transformative change towards sustainability. Biocultural approaches recognize the diverse ways in which people relate to nature, offering a potential pathway for sustainability transformations. However, recent scholarship on biocultural approaches to sustainability has highlighted that social aspects such as equity and justice have not been substantively addressed, whereby gender issues have been overlooked to a great extent. Through qualitative content analysis, this review synthesizes the conceptualizations of gender and social difference within the literature on biocultural approaches to sustainability published in English and Spanish. The biocultural literature predominantly focuses on describing knowledge and management practices, neglecting power and gender relations that affect access and control over resources, and how different axes of social difference matter across different social-ecological contexts. Overall, we found that gender considerations within the literature reviewed do not build upon feminist and gender theories. Based on these findings, we provide insights into how more nuanced engagements, especially in relation to feminist theories and tools as intersectionality and decolonial perspectives, can allow for more just scholarly efforts to address biocultural relations. Finally, we draw attention to responsible and engaged praxis towards promoting biocultural approaches that include the diverse perspectives of those who can contribute to transformative change, and which prevent the reinforcement of gender-based power relations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.",

keywords = "environmental justice, feminist approaches, indigenous and local knowledge, intersectionality, non-humans, power relations, women, Ecosystems Research, Biology",

author = "Isabel D{\'i}az-Reviriego and Mario Torralba and Beatriz Vizuete and Stefan Ortiz-Przychodzka and Jasmine Pearson and Claudia Heindorf and Aymara LLanque Zonta and Elisa Oteros-Rozas",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.",

year = "2024",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1002/pan3.10673",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "1394--1406",

journal = "People and Nature",

issn = "2575-8314",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",

number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches

AU - Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel

AU - Torralba, Mario

AU - Vizuete, Beatriz

AU - Ortiz-Przychodzka, Stefan

AU - Pearson, Jasmine

AU - Heindorf, Claudia

AU - LLanque Zonta, Aymara

AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa

PY - 2024/8

Y1 - 2024/8

N2 - Advancing research and practice that recognize diverse worldviews, knowledge systems, and value orientations is essential to enable transformative change towards sustainability. Biocultural approaches recognize the diverse ways in which people relate to nature, offering a potential pathway for sustainability transformations. However, recent scholarship on biocultural approaches to sustainability has highlighted that social aspects such as equity and justice have not been substantively addressed, whereby gender issues have been overlooked to a great extent. Through qualitative content analysis, this review synthesizes the conceptualizations of gender and social difference within the literature on biocultural approaches to sustainability published in English and Spanish. The biocultural literature predominantly focuses on describing knowledge and management practices, neglecting power and gender relations that affect access and control over resources, and how different axes of social difference matter across different social-ecological contexts. Overall, we found that gender considerations within the literature reviewed do not build upon feminist and gender theories. Based on these findings, we provide insights into how more nuanced engagements, especially in relation to feminist theories and tools as intersectionality and decolonial perspectives, can allow for more just scholarly efforts to address biocultural relations. Finally, we draw attention to responsible and engaged praxis towards promoting biocultural approaches that include the diverse perspectives of those who can contribute to transformative change, and which prevent the reinforcement of gender-based power relations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

AB - Advancing research and practice that recognize diverse worldviews, knowledge systems, and value orientations is essential to enable transformative change towards sustainability. Biocultural approaches recognize the diverse ways in which people relate to nature, offering a potential pathway for sustainability transformations. However, recent scholarship on biocultural approaches to sustainability has highlighted that social aspects such as equity and justice have not been substantively addressed, whereby gender issues have been overlooked to a great extent. Through qualitative content analysis, this review synthesizes the conceptualizations of gender and social difference within the literature on biocultural approaches to sustainability published in English and Spanish. The biocultural literature predominantly focuses on describing knowledge and management practices, neglecting power and gender relations that affect access and control over resources, and how different axes of social difference matter across different social-ecological contexts. Overall, we found that gender considerations within the literature reviewed do not build upon feminist and gender theories. Based on these findings, we provide insights into how more nuanced engagements, especially in relation to feminist theories and tools as intersectionality and decolonial perspectives, can allow for more just scholarly efforts to address biocultural relations. Finally, we draw attention to responsible and engaged praxis towards promoting biocultural approaches that include the diverse perspectives of those who can contribute to transformative change, and which prevent the reinforcement of gender-based power relations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

KW - environmental justice

KW - feminist approaches

KW - indigenous and local knowledge

KW - intersectionality

KW - non-humans

KW - power relations

KW - women

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196675018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ad1b84f2-9169-36fb-887c-a4e0adc6aebd/

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.10673

DO - 10.1002/pan3.10673

M3 - Scientific review articles

AN - SCOPUS:85196675018

VL - 6

SP - 1394

EP - 1406

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - 4

ER -