Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions

Research output: Journal contributionsScientific review articlesResearch

Authors

  • Alexander Rozental
  • Gerhard Andersson
  • Johanna Boettcher
  • David Daniel Ebert
  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Christine Knaevelsrud
  • Brjánn Ljótsson
  • Viktor Kaldo
  • Nickolai Titov
  • Per Carlbring
Internet interventions have great potential for alleviating emotional distress, promoting mental health, and enhancing well-being. Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy for a number of psychiatric conditions, and interventions delivered via the Internet will likely become a common alternative to face-to-face treatment. Meanwhile, research has paid little attention to the negative effects associated with treatment, warranting further investigation of the possibility that some patients might deteriorate or encounter adverse events despite receiving best available care. Evidence from research of face-to-face treatment suggests that negative effects afflict 5–10% of all patients undergoing treatment in terms of deterioration. However, there is currently a lack of consensus on how to define and measure negative effects in psychotherapy research in general, leaving researchers without practical guidelines for monitoring and reporting negative effects in clinical trials. The current paper therefore seeks to provide recommendations that could promote the study of negative effects in Internet interventions with the aim of increasing the knowledge of its occurrence and characteristics. Ten leading experts in the field of Internet interventions were invited to participate and share their perspective on how to explore negative effects, using the Delphi technique to facilitate a dialog and reach an agreement. The authors discuss the importance of conducting research on negative effects in order to further the understanding of its incidence and different features. Suggestions on how to classify and measure negative effects in Internet interventions are proposed, involving methods from both quantitative and qualitative research. Potential mechanisms underlying negative effects are also discussed, differentiating common factors shared with face-to-face treatments from those unique to treatments delivered via the Internet. The authors conclude that negative effects are to be expected and need to be acknowledged to a greater extent, advising researchers to systematically probe for negative effects whenever conducting clinical trials involving Internet interventions, as well as to share their findings in scientific journals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternet Interventions
Volume1
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)12-19
Number of pages8
ISSN2214-7829
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.03.2014

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was made possible by a generous grant from the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare ( FORTE 2013-1107 ). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Formalised and Non-Formalised Methods in Resource Management-Knowledge and Social Learning in Participatory Processes
  2. Time Use Research and Time Use Data
  3. Landscape fluidity - a unifying perspective for understanding and adapting to global change
  4. Error handling in office work with computers
  5. Elevated Temperature and Varied Load Response of AS41 at Bolted Joint
  6. Pragmatics broadly viewed
  7. Contrasting requests in Inner Circle Englishes
  8. From teacher-centered instruction to peer tutoring in the heterogeneous international classroom
  9. Testing for a break in the persistence in yield spreads of EMU government bonds
  10. Exploring the uncanny valley effect in affective social robotics
  11. Cyclooxygenase-2-expression in the outer root sheath of anagen but not telogen hair follicles of the mouse skin
  12. Excellence in Teaching and Learning
  13. Explicit references in chat-based CSCL
  14. Models for integrated production-inventory systems
  15. Lifeworld and System
  16. Modeling of microstructural pattern formation in crystal plasticity
  17. Development of tools to prevent food waste
  18. Conceptualizing sustainable consumption
  19. Modeling Interactions and Dependencies in Production Planning and Control
  20. EVALUATION FORM FOR TRAINEES AS A HUMAN-RESOURCE DATA INSTRUMENT - SUGGESTIONS FOR ITS CONSTRUCTION AND RESULTS OF AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY
  21. Responsible Research is also concerned with generalizability
  22. Local Responses to Global Integration in a Transnational Professional Service Firm
  23. NEW CONCEPTS IN INNOVATION OUTPUT MEASUREMENT - KLEINKNECHT,A, BAIN,D
  24. Going beyond efficiency: including altruistic motives in behavioral models for sustainability transitions to address sufficiency.
  25. Strategy execution in higher education
  26. Green your community click by click
  27. Habitat suitability models in conservation planning – a short introduction
  28. A qualitative approach to evidence-based entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and an example involving business clusters
  29. Anthropogenic factors overrule local abiotic variables in determining non-native plant invasions in mountains
  30. A flexible global warming index for use in an integrated approach to climate change assessment
  31. FragSAD: A database of diversity and species abundance distributions from habitat fragments
  32. Coauthoring collaborative strategy when voices are many and authority is ambiguous
  33. Misconceptions of Measurement Equivalence
  34. A panel cointegration rank test with structural breaks and cross-sectional dependence
  35. Diversity of Play