Comparing apples with oranges? An approach to link TIMSS and the National Educational Panel Study in Germany via equipercentile and IRT methods
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Standard
In: Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 47, 01.12.2015, p. 58–67.
Research output: Journal contributions › Journal articles › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing apples with oranges? An approach to link TIMSS and the National Educational Panel Study in Germany via equipercentile and IRT methods
AU - Nissen, Annika
AU - Ehmke, Timo
AU - Köller, Olaf
AU - Duchhardt, Christoph
N1 - Funding Information: The project was funded by the Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in Germany. The authors would like to thank the ZIB and BMBF for their support. Publisher Copyright: © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - The aim of this linking study is to classify the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) according to the criterion based reference frame of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). One requirement for a strong linking is a high conceptual overlap of the frameworks. The results of the comparison between NEPS and TIMSS indicate a high overlap. To link the studies the equipercentile equating and an IRT linking approach are compared. The results show that both methods showed similar descriptive statistics and satisfying classification consistency. Nevertheless, the equipercentile equating has small advantages and is therefore more suitable. Thus, inferences are possible on a population level, but the results should not be reported or interpreted on an individual level.
AB - The aim of this linking study is to classify the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) according to the criterion based reference frame of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). One requirement for a strong linking is a high conceptual overlap of the frameworks. The results of the comparison between NEPS and TIMSS indicate a high overlap. To link the studies the equipercentile equating and an IRT linking approach are compared. The results show that both methods showed similar descriptive statistics and satisfying classification consistency. Nevertheless, the equipercentile equating has small advantages and is therefore more suitable. Thus, inferences are possible on a population level, but the results should not be reported or interpreted on an individual level.
KW - Empirical education research
KW - Equating methods
KW - Large scale assessment
KW - Linking study
KW - Mathematics competencies
KW - Student assessment
KW - TIMSS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946819019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.07.003
M3 - Journal articles
VL - 47
SP - 58
EP - 67
JO - Studies in Educational Evaluation
JF - Studies in Educational Evaluation
SN - 0191-491X
ER -