Carbon Accounting for Sustainability and Management: Status Quo and Challenges

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Carbon Accounting for Sustainability and Management: Status Quo and Challenges. / Schaltegger, Stefan; Csutora, Maria.
In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 36, 11.2012, p. 1-16.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{862f2e02bf0d4d779f55c422118d8a51,
title = "Carbon Accounting for Sustainability and Management: Status Quo and Challenges",
abstract = "This paper provides an overview of carbon accounting as a rapidly developing area of sustainability management and this special issue. The global nature of greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing climate change impacts is a context that demands new, more holistic approaches to preventing and reducing the negative impacts of climate change. This requires improved ways to anticipate and to fulfil new information requirements and to provide guidance on how to use the evolving accounting approaches for transparency, accountability and decision-making in governments, companies, academia and in non-profit organizations. Different types of carbon accounts – scientific, political, economic and corporate, are evolving. They are related but are not properly interlinked in policy or strategic. On the corporate level, carbon accounting can support carbon management with two basic approaches, carbon accounts for un-sustainability and carbon accounting for sustainability improvements. Both approaches play an increasing role for corporate functions such as production, distribution, procurement, supply chain management, innovation, communication, and marketing. Carbon management accounting can support all organizational levels in decision-making, regardless of whether a department is particularly challenged to comply with regulations, to better organize energy and material flows for substantial reduction effects, or is motivated to increase eco-efficiency, product innovation or legitimacy. This paper distinguishes different company-internal areas of application and methods of carbon accounting. To support corporate decision-makers environmental management accounting framework provides a structured overview of methods distinguishing physical and monetary approaches to carbon accounting. With the expanding scope of carbon accounting practices to include supply chains and product life-cycles, researchers are challenged to develop new methods, such as input–output assisted hybrid accounting.",
keywords = "Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics, carbon accounting, Greenhouse gas accounting, Management Accounting, sustainability management, Sustainable development, Environmental management accounting, climate change, carbon accounting, climate change, Environmental management accounting, Greenhouse gas accounting, Management Accounting, sustainability management, Sustainable development",
author = "Stefan Schaltegger and Maria Csutora",
year = "2012",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carbon Accounting for Sustainability and Management

T2 - Status Quo and Challenges

AU - Schaltegger, Stefan

AU - Csutora, Maria

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - This paper provides an overview of carbon accounting as a rapidly developing area of sustainability management and this special issue. The global nature of greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing climate change impacts is a context that demands new, more holistic approaches to preventing and reducing the negative impacts of climate change. This requires improved ways to anticipate and to fulfil new information requirements and to provide guidance on how to use the evolving accounting approaches for transparency, accountability and decision-making in governments, companies, academia and in non-profit organizations. Different types of carbon accounts – scientific, political, economic and corporate, are evolving. They are related but are not properly interlinked in policy or strategic. On the corporate level, carbon accounting can support carbon management with two basic approaches, carbon accounts for un-sustainability and carbon accounting for sustainability improvements. Both approaches play an increasing role for corporate functions such as production, distribution, procurement, supply chain management, innovation, communication, and marketing. Carbon management accounting can support all organizational levels in decision-making, regardless of whether a department is particularly challenged to comply with regulations, to better organize energy and material flows for substantial reduction effects, or is motivated to increase eco-efficiency, product innovation or legitimacy. This paper distinguishes different company-internal areas of application and methods of carbon accounting. To support corporate decision-makers environmental management accounting framework provides a structured overview of methods distinguishing physical and monetary approaches to carbon accounting. With the expanding scope of carbon accounting practices to include supply chains and product life-cycles, researchers are challenged to develop new methods, such as input–output assisted hybrid accounting.

AB - This paper provides an overview of carbon accounting as a rapidly developing area of sustainability management and this special issue. The global nature of greenhouse gas emissions as well as increasing climate change impacts is a context that demands new, more holistic approaches to preventing and reducing the negative impacts of climate change. This requires improved ways to anticipate and to fulfil new information requirements and to provide guidance on how to use the evolving accounting approaches for transparency, accountability and decision-making in governments, companies, academia and in non-profit organizations. Different types of carbon accounts – scientific, political, economic and corporate, are evolving. They are related but are not properly interlinked in policy or strategic. On the corporate level, carbon accounting can support carbon management with two basic approaches, carbon accounts for un-sustainability and carbon accounting for sustainability improvements. Both approaches play an increasing role for corporate functions such as production, distribution, procurement, supply chain management, innovation, communication, and marketing. Carbon management accounting can support all organizational levels in decision-making, regardless of whether a department is particularly challenged to comply with regulations, to better organize energy and material flows for substantial reduction effects, or is motivated to increase eco-efficiency, product innovation or legitimacy. This paper distinguishes different company-internal areas of application and methods of carbon accounting. To support corporate decision-makers environmental management accounting framework provides a structured overview of methods distinguishing physical and monetary approaches to carbon accounting. With the expanding scope of carbon accounting practices to include supply chains and product life-cycles, researchers are challenged to develop new methods, such as input–output assisted hybrid accounting.

KW - Sustainability sciences, Management & Economics

KW - carbon accounting

KW - Greenhouse gas accounting

KW - Management Accounting

KW - sustainability management

KW - Sustainable development

KW - Environmental management accounting

KW - climate change

KW - carbon accounting

KW - climate change

KW - Environmental management accounting

KW - Greenhouse gas accounting

KW - Management Accounting

KW - sustainability management

KW - Sustainable development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864973349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2c4f5c87-a828-33b3-bb67-385878026b56/

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.024

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 36

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Gerecht geht anders!
  2. Voluntary Corporate Health Promotion as Strategic Function of HRM
  3. Arzneimittel in Gewässern
  4. Lernaufgaben nachhaltig gedacht
  5. Klassentestheft Teil 1 (10 Ex.) - 2. Schuljahr
  6. Job stress
  7. Corrosion properties of secondary AZ91 alloys
  8. Works Councils - Sand or Grease in the Operation of German Firms?
  9. „Dan Flavin” / “Ilya Kabakov” / “Urs Fischer”
  10. Vertrauen, Institutionen und mentale Modelle
  11. „Perspektiven wechseln“ – Tagen unter Pandemiebedingungen
  12. Erzieherischer Kinder- und Jugendmedienschutz
  13. Wie viel Weltfremdheit gehört zur Wiedergeburt?
  14. Profil der Lehrkräfte, der Schulleiterinnen und Schulleiter sowie der Schulen
  15. Kooperation : Neue Wege für die Sozialwirtschaft
  16. Communities of ground-living spiders in deciduous forests
  17. Al Kaida als aktueller Forschungsgegenstand
  18. Strategie als Herausforderung für die deliberative Demokratietheorie
  19. Freiheit der Kunst durch freie Werke?
  20. Careerists or Educational Aspirants? – (Re-)entry of European Lifelong Learners into Higher Education
  21. “It’s not as academic and impossible as it seems to be” – Aktionsforschung und berufliches Selbstvertrauen in der fremdsprachlichen Lehrerbildung
  22. Die Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter an die Organisation binden:
  23. Nachhaltigkeit lernen mit Kindern
  24. Medien- und Kommunikationsforschung
  25. Emotionen und politisches Lernen
  26. Künstlerrollen in den Creative Industries
  27. Migration - Entfesselung neuer Kräfte?
  28. National Cultural Values, Firm’s Cultural Orientation, Innovation and Performance: Testing Cultural Universals and Specific Contingencies Across Five Countries.
  29. Persönlichkeit und Entrepreneurship
  30. Theorie-Praxis-Verzahnung als konstituierendes Element des ZZL-Netzwerks
  31. Modellierung der Ammoniak-Emission nach Ausbringung von organischen Wirtschaftsdüngern
  32. Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung
  33. Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Regeln einer Regelgröße