Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

  • Andrea Schnepf
  • Christopher K. Black
  • Valentin Couvreur
  • Benjamin M. Delory
  • Claude Doussan
  • Axelle Koch
  • Timo Koch
  • Mathieu Javaux
  • Magdalena Landl
  • Daniel Leitner
  • Guillaume Lobet
  • Trung Hieu Mai
  • Félicien Meunier
  • Lukas Petrich
  • Johannes A. Postma
  • Eckart Priesack
  • Volker Schmidt
  • Jan Vanderborght
  • Harry Vereecken
  • Matthias Weber

Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and engineering sciences, functional-structural root architecture models have never been systematically compared. The following reasons might induce disagreement between the simulation results of different models: different representation of root growth, sink term of root water and solute uptake and representation of the rhizosphere. Presently, the extent of discrepancies is unknown, and a framework for quantitatively comparing functional-structural root architecture models is required. We propose, in a first step, to define benchmarking scenarios that test individual components of complex models: root architecture, water flow in soil and water flow in roots. While the latter two will focus mainly on comparing numerical aspects, the root architectural models have to be compared at a conceptual level as they generally differ in process representation. Therefore, defining common inputs that allow recreating reference root systems in all models will be a key challenge. In a second step, benchmarking scenarios for the coupled problems are defined. We expect that the results of step 1 will enable us to better interpret differences found in step 2. This benchmarking will result in a better understanding of the different models and contribute toward improving them. Improved models will allow us to simulate various scenarios with greater confidence and avoid bugs, numerical errors or conceptual misunderstandings. This work will set a standard for future model development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number316
JournalFrontiers in Plant Science
Volume11
Number of pages21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31.03.2020

    Research areas

  • Ecosystems Research - benchmark, call for participation, functional-structural root architecture models, model comparison, root water uptake

Documents

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Primary source regions of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) measured in the Arctic
  2. A strategy for an initial assessment of the ecotoxicological effects of transformation products of pesticides in aquatic systems following a tiered approach
  3. Managing increasing environmental risks through agro-biodiversity and agri-environmental policies
  4. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  5. Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression
  6. Article 1 Scope
  7. Authentizität mathematischer Modellierungsaufgaben in standardisierten Testsituationen
  8. Managing invasive species amidst high uncertainty and novelty
  9. Assessing impact of varied social and ecological conditions on inherent vulnerability of Himalayan agriculture communities
  10. Unintended Consequences of Field Experiments in Poverty Settings
  11. Socio-technical change linking expectations and representations
  12. Discovering cooperation
  13. A System for Clearance Measurement of Bearings before and after Assembling
  14. Lesen unter Gleichen
  15. Driving factors for the regional implementation of renewable energy
  16. Was heisst Ontologie unserer selbst?
  17. Emotional states of drivers and the impact on speed, acceleration and traffic violations - A simulator study
  18. Sozio-Controlling im Unternehmen
  19. Meta-analysis as a tool for developing entrepreneurship research and theory
  20. Exploring plant community assembly for its potential for grassland restoration
  21. Appendix
  22. Strategic Spatial Planning
  23. Response of a shrubland mammal and reptile community to a history of landscape-scale wildfire
  24. The cognitive representation of genetic engineering
  25. A Social Network Perspective on International Assignments:
  26. Can the business model of Handelsbanken be an archetype for small and medium sized banks?