Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Authors

A classic definition of social inequality comes from the sociologist Max Weber, who wrote that there are three fundamental types of inequality. The first is based in the marketplace and is “social class”. The second, and more important distinction, is based in estimations of honour that Weber called in German Stand, which traditionally is translated into English as “status group”. The third type of stratification is “party” where power is distributed. Weber emphasized that the two forms of stratification emerge out of two different parts of society: Stand with its emphasis on honour emerges out of the most fundamental part of society rooted in loyalties, the Gemeinschaft, whereas class emerges out of a sub-unit of the Gemeinschaft, rationally ordered markets and legal structures of the Gesellschaft. Party emerges out of both. In Weber’s estimation, two types of social stratification, class and Stand, although related, cannot be mixed because they are fundamentally different. The former is rooted in abstract emotion and the latter in rational calculation. To do so, he writes, is a “warped reasoning”. Despite Weber’s warnings, English-language terms used to measure social inequality, particularly “socio-economic status”, conflate the two qualities, presenting them as a single variable. However, when the two are separated, analysts get a much more nuanced view of the mechanisms for how different types of inequality persist, be they in the professions, residence, ethnicity, race or caste.

Original languageEnglish
Article number16002
JournalPalgrave Communications
Volume2
ISSN2055-1045
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01.03.2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Benjamin Elbers commented on drafts of this paper. We are also grateful to the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, California State University, Chico, for a timely grant to help bring this paper to publication.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Deconstructing a 2-year long transdisciplinary sustainability project in Northern universities
  2. Post-rescue innocent passage by non-governmental search and rescue vessels in the mediterranean
  3. A leverage points perspective on social networks to understand sustainability transformations
  4. Environmental education for local authorities in Germany and a new distance learning approach.
  5. Institutionelle Logik im Wandel: Managementmodelle als Innovation in der Gesundheitsversorgung
  6. Farmers' perceptions of climate change and adaptation strategies in South Africa's Western Cape
  7. Das Sozialmanagement stärken: Qualitätskriterien und Nutzwertanalyse im Corporate Volunteering
  8. Zur Rolle des Kollisionsrechts bei der zivilrechtlichen Haftung für Menschenrechtsverletzungen
  9. What drives the spatial distribution and dynamics of local species richness in tropical forest?
  10. Mental contrasting and conflict management in satisfied and unsatisfied romantic relationships
  11. Learner pragmatics at the discourse level: Staying “on topic” in a telecollaborative eTandem task
  12. Ontology-Guided, Hybrid Prompt Learning for Generalization in Knowledge Graph Question Answering
  13. Subjektive Statusinkongruenz, Mobilitätsbereitschaft und Zufriedenheit mit der beruflichen Lage.
  14. My Cigarette Wife and Other Queer Tales of Kinship from Tunisia’s Contemporary Public Art Scene
  15. Towards the design of active pharmaceutical ingredients mineralizing readily in the environment
  16. Critical Evaluation of Sustainable Development Goals and Circular Economy in (Business) Education
  17. Judicial Ethics for a Global Judiciary – How Judicial Networks Create their own Codes of Conduct
  18. INFLEXIBLE COMMODITY PRICES AS A RESULT OF PROFIT MAXIMIZATION - REPLY TO A COMMENT BY MAUSSNER,A.
  19. Modelling biodegradability based on OECD 301D data for the design of mineralising ionic liquids
  20. Law versus Economics? How should insurance intermediaries influence the insurance demand decision.
  21. Added value of convection-permitting simulations for understanding future urban humidity extremes