Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber? / Waters, Tony; Waters, Dagmar.
In: Palgrave Communications, Vol. 2, 16002, 01.03.2016.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{506319cf3fcc4535ba64c036e5699dd3,
title = "Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?",
abstract = "A classic definition of social inequality comes from the sociologist Max Weber, who wrote that there are three fundamental types of inequality. The first is based in the marketplace and is “social class”. The second, and more important distinction, is based in estimations of honour that Weber called in German Stand, which traditionally is translated into English as “status group”. The third type of stratification is “party” where power is distributed. Weber emphasized that the two forms of stratification emerge out of two different parts of society: Stand with its emphasis on honour emerges out of the most fundamental part of society rooted in loyalties, the Gemeinschaft, whereas class emerges out of a sub-unit of the Gemeinschaft, rationally ordered markets and legal structures of the Gesellschaft. Party emerges out of both. In Weber{\textquoteright}s estimation, two types of social stratification, class and Stand, although related, cannot be mixed because they are fundamentally different. The former is rooted in abstract emotion and the latter in rational calculation. To do so, he writes, is a “warped reasoning”. Despite Weber{\textquoteright}s warnings, English-language terms used to measure social inequality, particularly “socio-economic status”, conflate the two qualities, presenting them as a single variable. However, when the two are separated, analysts get a much more nuanced view of the mechanisms for how different types of inequality persist, be they in the professions, residence, ethnicity, race or caste.",
keywords = "Sociology",
author = "Tony Waters and Dagmar Waters",
note = "Funding Information: Benjamin Elbers commented on drafts of this paper. We are also grateful to the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, California State University, Chico, for a timely grant to help bring this paper to publication. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/palcomms.2016.2",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Palgrave Communications",
issn = "2055-1045",
publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are the terms “Socio-economic status” and “Class status” a warped form of reasoning for Max Weber?

AU - Waters, Tony

AU - Waters, Dagmar

N1 - Funding Information: Benjamin Elbers commented on drafts of this paper. We are also grateful to the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, California State University, Chico, for a timely grant to help bring this paper to publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - A classic definition of social inequality comes from the sociologist Max Weber, who wrote that there are three fundamental types of inequality. The first is based in the marketplace and is “social class”. The second, and more important distinction, is based in estimations of honour that Weber called in German Stand, which traditionally is translated into English as “status group”. The third type of stratification is “party” where power is distributed. Weber emphasized that the two forms of stratification emerge out of two different parts of society: Stand with its emphasis on honour emerges out of the most fundamental part of society rooted in loyalties, the Gemeinschaft, whereas class emerges out of a sub-unit of the Gemeinschaft, rationally ordered markets and legal structures of the Gesellschaft. Party emerges out of both. In Weber’s estimation, two types of social stratification, class and Stand, although related, cannot be mixed because they are fundamentally different. The former is rooted in abstract emotion and the latter in rational calculation. To do so, he writes, is a “warped reasoning”. Despite Weber’s warnings, English-language terms used to measure social inequality, particularly “socio-economic status”, conflate the two qualities, presenting them as a single variable. However, when the two are separated, analysts get a much more nuanced view of the mechanisms for how different types of inequality persist, be they in the professions, residence, ethnicity, race or caste.

AB - A classic definition of social inequality comes from the sociologist Max Weber, who wrote that there are three fundamental types of inequality. The first is based in the marketplace and is “social class”. The second, and more important distinction, is based in estimations of honour that Weber called in German Stand, which traditionally is translated into English as “status group”. The third type of stratification is “party” where power is distributed. Weber emphasized that the two forms of stratification emerge out of two different parts of society: Stand with its emphasis on honour emerges out of the most fundamental part of society rooted in loyalties, the Gemeinschaft, whereas class emerges out of a sub-unit of the Gemeinschaft, rationally ordered markets and legal structures of the Gesellschaft. Party emerges out of both. In Weber’s estimation, two types of social stratification, class and Stand, although related, cannot be mixed because they are fundamentally different. The former is rooted in abstract emotion and the latter in rational calculation. To do so, he writes, is a “warped reasoning”. Despite Weber’s warnings, English-language terms used to measure social inequality, particularly “socio-economic status”, conflate the two qualities, presenting them as a single variable. However, when the two are separated, analysts get a much more nuanced view of the mechanisms for how different types of inequality persist, be they in the professions, residence, ethnicity, race or caste.

KW - Sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046659359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palcomms.2016.2

DO - 10.1057/palcomms.2016.2

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85046659359

VL - 2

JO - Palgrave Communications

JF - Palgrave Communications

SN - 2055-1045

M1 - 16002

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Armed to Kill
  2. Web-based guided self-help for employees with depressive symptoms (Happy@Work)
  3. Corrosion behavior and microstructure of a broad range of Mg-Sn-X alloys
  4. A flexible semi-empirical model for estimating ammonia volatilization from field-applied slurry
  5. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology
  6. Using Large N Longitudinal Comparison to Explain Political Recruitment in Changing Democracies
  7. Article 3 Universal Application
  8. Walking Text and Writing Space
  9. Nachhaltigkeitsethik
  10. An interpretive perspective on co-production in supporting refugee families’ access to childcare in Germany
  11. Effekte inter-organisationaler Balanced Scorecards
  12. Fremde Töpfe
  13. Virtual-exchange collaboration timeline planner
  14. Fieldwork meets crisis: Introduction
  15. Das Reflexivitätsproblem und die Kategorienlehre
  16. Universität hat Zukunft
  17. Political Representation in the EU
  18. Globalisierung
  19. From the environmental state to the sustainability state? Conceptualization, indicators, and examples
  20. Amtsmenschen
  21. When (and how) ideas become arguments
  22. Fallstudie
  23. How environmental and social orientations influence the funding success of investment-based crowdfunding
  24. Fallstudie
  25. Average wage, qualification of the workforce and export performance in German enterprises: evidence from KombiFiD data
  26. How to measure energy-efficiency of software
  27. Small Particle Size Magnesium in One-pot Grignard-Zerewitinoff-like Reactions under Mechanochemical Conditions
  28. Bifunctional recombinant protein SDF1-GPVI as a new therapeutic concept for improved regeneration
  29. Can't Stop The Feeling
  30. Deformation-induced dynamic precipitation during creep in magnesium-tin alloys
  31. The attenuating effect of mortality salience on dishonest behavior
  32. Entrepreneurship and the "theory of planned behavior"
  33. Over here and over there
  34. Principles and perspectives of European criminal procedure
  35. Editorial Overview
  36. Der RADIUS eines Verlages
  37. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance
  38. A leverage point perspective on serious games for sustainability transformation
  39. Christine Helmer: The trinity and Martin Luther