Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop? / Burmeister, Anne; Deller, Jürgen; Szkudlarek, Betina et al.
in: Academy of Management Proceedings, Jahrgang 2015, Nr. 1, 10972, 08.2015.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Burmeister A, Deller J, Szkudlarek B, Oddou G, Blakeney R. Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop? Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015 Aug;2015(1):10972. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

Bibtex

@article{f3cd1f382621432a8fd48a75058e3f44,
title = "Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?",
abstract = "This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process. ",
keywords = "Business psychology, Content Analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness, Content analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness",
author = "Anne Burmeister and J{\"u}rgen Deller and Betina Szkudlarek and Gary Oddou and Roger Blakeney",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management (Briarcliff Manor, NY) ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer

T2 - Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

AU - Burmeister, Anne

AU - Deller, Jürgen

AU - Szkudlarek, Betina

AU - Oddou, Gary

AU - Blakeney, Roger

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

AB - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Content Analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

KW - Content analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 2015

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 10972

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Gender studies im Rahmen gestufer Studiengänge
  2. Perspektiven der Energiepolitik in Deutschland
  3. Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without Russia
  4. Biokohle in der Landwirtschaft als Klimaretter?
  5. Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als reflexive Politik
  6. Wie partizipativ sind Bottom-up-Transformationen?
  7. Management von Biodiversität in Schutzgebieten
  8. Orienting Orientalism, or How to Map Cyberspace
  9. Die Regulierung von Carework im Privathaushalt
  10. CO2-Steuer oder Ausweitung des Emissionshandels
  11. Controlling nachhaltiger Wertschöpfungsketten
  12. Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung und Lehre
  13. Pragmatism, Truth and Social Accounting Research
  14. Does Carbon Disclosure Drive Carbon Performance
  15. Schriftliches Begründen im Mathematikunterricht.
  16. Arbeitszufriedenheit und flexible Arbeitszeiten
  17. Arbeitszufriedenheit und flexible Arbeitszeiten
  18. Learning pragmatic routines during study abroad
  19. Polycrystalline and amorphous MgZnCa thin films
  20. Demagogen von rechts, Provokateure aus der Mitte
  21. Zwischen Existenzkampf und Professionalisierung
  22. Sustainability Competencies in Higher Education
  23. A strategic model of European gas supply (GASMOD)
  24. Modeling the low-carbon transformation in Europe
  25. Europe's twenties: a study using the WIATEC model
  26. Nachhaltiges Qualitätsmanagement von Landschaft
  27. Nationale Aspekte des Umwandlungssteuererlasses
  28. The “First Ones to Close and Last Ones to Re-Open”
  29. New Media, Old Media: A History and Theory Reader
  30. Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance:
  31. Transformations of pesticides in the atmosphere
  32. Special issue on Responsible Management Learning: