Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop? / Burmeister, Anne; Deller, Jürgen; Szkudlarek, Betina et al.
in: Academy of Management Proceedings, Jahrgang 2015, Nr. 1, 10972, 08.2015.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenKonferenzaufsätze in FachzeitschriftenForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Burmeister A, Deller J, Szkudlarek B, Oddou G, Blakeney R. Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop? Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015 Aug;2015(1):10972. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

Bibtex

@article{f3cd1f382621432a8fd48a75058e3f44,
title = "Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?",
abstract = "This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process. ",
keywords = "Business psychology, Content Analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness, Content analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness",
author = "Anne Burmeister and J{\"u}rgen Deller and Betina Szkudlarek and Gary Oddou and Roger Blakeney",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract",
language = "English",
volume = "2015",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management (Briarcliff Manor, NY) ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer

T2 - Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

AU - Burmeister, Anne

AU - Deller, Jürgen

AU - Szkudlarek, Betina

AU - Oddou, Gary

AU - Blakeney, Roger

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

AB - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Content Analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

KW - Content analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 2015

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 10972

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Guido Barbian

Publikationen

  1. Empathie und Solidarität mit Um- und Nachwelt
  2. § 48 Solare Strahlungsenergie
  3. Der Raum des Cyberspace
  4. Schüler und Sportunterricht
  5. Faire de la recherche avec des artistes. La continuité entre l'art et la science
  6. § 350 Erlöschen des Rücktrittsrechts nach Fristsetzung
  7. § 290 Verzinsung des Wertersatzes
  8. Selbstständigkeit stärken und herausfordern
  9. Unsichtbare Schutzgeister im Kampf gegen den Lebensmittelverderb
  10. Auf dem Rückzug in die Kasernen?
  11. Neuausrichtung von Rechnungslegung und Prüfungswesen
  12. Ohne Ambition ist alle Strategie nichts
  13. Anlage und Durchführung der LEK-Studie
  14. Kann man Verantwortung lernen ?
  15. § 291 Prozesszinsen
  16. Vom Rand ins Zentrum
  17. Art. 229 a EGV (Entscheidung über gewerblichen Rechtsschutz) (Nizza-Fassung)
  18. Zur (De-)Professionalisierung der Sportstudierenden im Praxissemester
  19. Kombinatorisches Zählen
  20. Pädagogik der Freizeit & Tourismus
  21. Frauenhauskinder und ihr Weg ins Leben
  22. Krieg und Zivilgesellschaft
  23. Stadt als Möglichkeitsraum
  24. Roadside disturbance promotes plant communities with arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in mountain regions worldwide
  25. Umweltkonflikte und Nachhaltigkeit in Lateinamerika
  26. Revisiting the sustainability science research agenda
  27. Tropical cyclone losses in the USA and the impact of climate change
  28. Inter-individual nectar chemistry changes of field scabious, Knautia arvensis
  29. Kommentar von: Art. 53
  30. Repowering
  31. Vorrangige Probleme von Jugendlichen ohne Ausbildungsvertrag und die Rolle des Sozialarbeiters in der Berufsschule
  32. The Termination of International Sanctions
  33. Mittig ist nur das Mittel
  34. Jünglinge der Moderne
  35. "Notwendigkeit des Vergleichs!“ Der Ansatz einer komparativen pädagogischen Berufsgruppenforschung
  36. The Relationship between Family Law and Female Entrepreneurship in Germany
  37. Klimaschutz durch Biokohle
  38. Luhmann und die Kulturtheorie