Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

Anne Burmeister; Jürgen Deller; Betina Szkudlarek; Gary Oddou; Roger Blakeney

doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

Research output: Journal contributions › Conference article in journal › Research › peer-review

Standard

Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer : Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop? / Burmeister, Anne ; Deller, Jürgen; Szkudlarek, Betina et al.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2015, No. 1, 10972, 08.2015.

Research output: Journal contributions › Conference article in journal › Research › peer-review

Bibtex

@article{f3cd1f382621432a8fd48a75058e3f44,

title = "Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer: Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?",

abstract = "This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process. ",

keywords = "Business psychology, Content Analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness, Content analysis, critical incident technique, international assignment, repatriate knowledge transfer, repatriation, trust, Trustworthiness",

author = "Anne Burmeister and J{\"u}rgen Deller and Betina Szkudlarek and Gary Oddou and Roger Blakeney",

year = "2015",

month = aug,

doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract",

language = "English",

volume = "2015",

journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",

issn = "0065-0668",

publisher = "Academy of Management (Briarcliff Manor, NY) ",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust and repatriate knowledge transfer

T2 - Whom do you trust, and how does this trust develop?

AU - Burmeister, Anne

AU - Deller, Jürgen

AU - Szkudlarek, Betina

AU - Oddou, Gary

AU - Blakeney, Roger

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

AB - This paper reports the results of theory-building qualitative research that aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the role of trust as it affects repatriate knowledge transfer. Data were obtained from 29 semi-structured interviews with German and U.S. repatriates using the critical incident technique. First, repatriates perceived an asymmetry between themselves and knowledge recipients regarding the different importance attached to the underlying dimensions of trustworthiness. Second, the type of knowledge influenced the mode of interaction and the trust development process between repatriates and knowledge recipients. Third, three trusting relationships between repatriates, recipients, and supervisors were detected as relevant for RKT. This study overcomes the simplistic treatment of the trust construct in previous studies on knowledge transfer. In addition, it clarifies the impact of different knowledge types and third actors, namely supervisors on the knowledge transfer process.

KW - Business psychology

KW - Content Analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

KW - Content analysis

KW - critical incident technique

KW - international assignment

KW - repatriate knowledge transfer

KW - repatriation

KW - trust

KW - Trustworthiness

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.10972abstract

M3 - Conference article in journal

VL - 2015

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 10972

ER -