Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro. / Degano, M. Eugenia; Augustino Kwaslema, Sophie; Böhning-Gaese, Katrin et al.
in: People and Nature, Jahrgang n/a, Nr. n/a, 2025.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

Degano, ME, Augustino Kwaslema, S, Böhning-Gaese, K, Hemp, A, Lehnen, L, Martín-López, B, Pearson, J, Mueller, T & Arbieu, U 2025, 'Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro', People and Nature, Jg. n/a, Nr. n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70079

APA

Degano, M. E., Augustino Kwaslema, S., Böhning-Gaese, K., Hemp, A., Lehnen, L., Martín-López, B., Pearson, J., Mueller, T., & Arbieu, U. (2025). Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro. People and Nature, n/a(n/a). Vorzeitige Online-Publikation. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70079

Vancouver

Degano ME, Augustino Kwaslema S, Böhning-Gaese K, Hemp A, Lehnen L, Martín-López B et al. Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro. People and Nature. 2025;n/a(n/a). Epub 2025. doi: 10.1002/pan3.70079

Bibtex

@article{b3231dee992e405cbaecc8cd90d00c36,
title = "Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro",
abstract = "Abstract Non-material Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), such as spirituality and aesthetic enjoyment, arise from interactions between people and entities of nature. However, their intangible and context-specific nature makes them challenging to identify and quantify. We analysed Twitter posts (now known as ?X?) from tourists across different habitats at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using a mixed-method approach. Based on the terms and expressions used by tourists, we identified the non-material NCP and entities of nature they perceived. We then assessed cross-habitat differences and investigated factors associated with the number of non-material NCP perceived. Tourists perceived 15 non-material NCP, four of which were previously not described in the literature: Sense of Achievement, Affective Experiences, Sensory Experiences and Iconic Places & Charismatic Experiences. Tourists used a wide range of terms to describe nature, which we grouped into 15 types of entities of nature. These included generic biotic and landscape entities (e.g. ?wildlife?, ?wilderness?), as well as specific abiotic entities like geological ones (e.g. ?volcano?). These entities of nature were associated with perception of more non-material NCP than specific biotic entities (e.g. ?chameleon?, ?monkey?, ?flower?). Importantly, non-material NCP perception did not align with the mountain's most biodiverse habitats. Instead, it peaked at the high- and low-elevation habitats, and it was lowest in the biodiversity-rich mid-elevation. Moreover, perception of biotic entities increased towards low-elevation habitats. Our findings suggest a priming effect on biodiversity perception, driven by the type of nature engagement: summit-focused activities may overshadow tourists' attention to biodiversity along the trail, whereas other experiences at lower elevations may foster greater appreciation of it. Synthesis and applications. Our fine-grained, context-specific approach reveals important details about people's interactions with nature. By understanding where and how people interact with nature, we can provide guidance on interventions that strengthen biodiversity awareness and engagement, enhance nature connectedness and ultimately support conservation efforts. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.",
keywords = "context-specific perspectives, culturomics, geodiversity, mountain ecosystems, Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), non-material, perceived biodiversity, social media",
author = "Degano, {M. Eugenia} and {Augustino Kwaslema}, Sophie and Katrin B{\"o}hning-Gaese and Andreas Hemp and Lisa Lehnen and Berta Mart{\'i}n-L{\'o}pez and Jasmine Pearson and Thomas Mueller and Ugo Arbieu",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.70079",
language = "English",
volume = "n/a",
journal = "People and Nature",
issn = "2575-8314",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
number = "n/a",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of nature and its non-material contributions to people at Mount Kilimanjaro

AU - Degano, M. Eugenia

AU - Augustino Kwaslema, Sophie

AU - Böhning-Gaese, Katrin

AU - Hemp, Andreas

AU - Lehnen, Lisa

AU - Martín-López, Berta

AU - Pearson, Jasmine

AU - Mueller, Thomas

AU - Arbieu, Ugo

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Abstract Non-material Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), such as spirituality and aesthetic enjoyment, arise from interactions between people and entities of nature. However, their intangible and context-specific nature makes them challenging to identify and quantify. We analysed Twitter posts (now known as ?X?) from tourists across different habitats at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using a mixed-method approach. Based on the terms and expressions used by tourists, we identified the non-material NCP and entities of nature they perceived. We then assessed cross-habitat differences and investigated factors associated with the number of non-material NCP perceived. Tourists perceived 15 non-material NCP, four of which were previously not described in the literature: Sense of Achievement, Affective Experiences, Sensory Experiences and Iconic Places & Charismatic Experiences. Tourists used a wide range of terms to describe nature, which we grouped into 15 types of entities of nature. These included generic biotic and landscape entities (e.g. ?wildlife?, ?wilderness?), as well as specific abiotic entities like geological ones (e.g. ?volcano?). These entities of nature were associated with perception of more non-material NCP than specific biotic entities (e.g. ?chameleon?, ?monkey?, ?flower?). Importantly, non-material NCP perception did not align with the mountain's most biodiverse habitats. Instead, it peaked at the high- and low-elevation habitats, and it was lowest in the biodiversity-rich mid-elevation. Moreover, perception of biotic entities increased towards low-elevation habitats. Our findings suggest a priming effect on biodiversity perception, driven by the type of nature engagement: summit-focused activities may overshadow tourists' attention to biodiversity along the trail, whereas other experiences at lower elevations may foster greater appreciation of it. Synthesis and applications. Our fine-grained, context-specific approach reveals important details about people's interactions with nature. By understanding where and how people interact with nature, we can provide guidance on interventions that strengthen biodiversity awareness and engagement, enhance nature connectedness and ultimately support conservation efforts. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

AB - Abstract Non-material Nature's Contributions to People (NCP), such as spirituality and aesthetic enjoyment, arise from interactions between people and entities of nature. However, their intangible and context-specific nature makes them challenging to identify and quantify. We analysed Twitter posts (now known as ?X?) from tourists across different habitats at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using a mixed-method approach. Based on the terms and expressions used by tourists, we identified the non-material NCP and entities of nature they perceived. We then assessed cross-habitat differences and investigated factors associated with the number of non-material NCP perceived. Tourists perceived 15 non-material NCP, four of which were previously not described in the literature: Sense of Achievement, Affective Experiences, Sensory Experiences and Iconic Places & Charismatic Experiences. Tourists used a wide range of terms to describe nature, which we grouped into 15 types of entities of nature. These included generic biotic and landscape entities (e.g. ?wildlife?, ?wilderness?), as well as specific abiotic entities like geological ones (e.g. ?volcano?). These entities of nature were associated with perception of more non-material NCP than specific biotic entities (e.g. ?chameleon?, ?monkey?, ?flower?). Importantly, non-material NCP perception did not align with the mountain's most biodiverse habitats. Instead, it peaked at the high- and low-elevation habitats, and it was lowest in the biodiversity-rich mid-elevation. Moreover, perception of biotic entities increased towards low-elevation habitats. Our findings suggest a priming effect on biodiversity perception, driven by the type of nature engagement: summit-focused activities may overshadow tourists' attention to biodiversity along the trail, whereas other experiences at lower elevations may foster greater appreciation of it. Synthesis and applications. Our fine-grained, context-specific approach reveals important details about people's interactions with nature. By understanding where and how people interact with nature, we can provide guidance on interventions that strengthen biodiversity awareness and engagement, enhance nature connectedness and ultimately support conservation efforts. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

KW - context-specific perspectives

KW - culturomics

KW - geodiversity

KW - mountain ecosystems

KW - Nature's Contributions to People (NCP)

KW - non-material

KW - perceived biodiversity

KW - social media

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.70079

DO - 10.1002/pan3.70079

M3 - Journal articles

VL - n/a

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - n/a

ER -

DOI