Managing Research Environments: Heterarchies in Academia. A Response to Cumming

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Standard

Managing Research Environments: Heterarchies in Academia. A Response to Cumming. / Fischer, Joern.
in: Trends in Ecology and Evolution, Jahrgang 31, Nr. 12, 01.12.2016, S. 900-902.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4b54413ea079456184f1b1f6ec0cc836,
title = "Managing Research Environments: Heterarchies in Academia. A Response to Cumming",
abstract = "The first stereotypical academic environment – the {\textquoteleft}guru model{\textquoteright} – is strongly hierarchical but not highly networked. This environment is one of strong silos, such as relatively isolated laboratory groups. Each such lab group is headed by a professor (the {\textquoteleft}guru{\textquoteright}) and responds to a dean or head of department. In this environment, hierarchy is also pronounced within lab groups. Postdocs occupy places between professors and PhD students, acting as intermediaries, or perhaps de facto supervising PhD students (very possibly without receiving official credit for it). In this environment many individuals work on different projects. Exchange among them is not strictly necessary and remains limited–that is, even within the lab, there is no strong culture of lateral collaboration (e.g., among PhD students or among postdocs). The overall environment is competitive and, arguably, some very successful professors have organized their labs in this way.",
keywords = "Ecosystems Research, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, Evolutionary Biology , Genetics & Heredity, Ecology ",
author = "Joern Fischer",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.010",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "900--902",
journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing Research Environments

T2 - Heterarchies in Academia. A Response to Cumming

AU - Fischer, Joern

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The first stereotypical academic environment – the ‘guru model’ – is strongly hierarchical but not highly networked. This environment is one of strong silos, such as relatively isolated laboratory groups. Each such lab group is headed by a professor (the ‘guru’) and responds to a dean or head of department. In this environment, hierarchy is also pronounced within lab groups. Postdocs occupy places between professors and PhD students, acting as intermediaries, or perhaps de facto supervising PhD students (very possibly without receiving official credit for it). In this environment many individuals work on different projects. Exchange among them is not strictly necessary and remains limited–that is, even within the lab, there is no strong culture of lateral collaboration (e.g., among PhD students or among postdocs). The overall environment is competitive and, arguably, some very successful professors have organized their labs in this way.

AB - The first stereotypical academic environment – the ‘guru model’ – is strongly hierarchical but not highly networked. This environment is one of strong silos, such as relatively isolated laboratory groups. Each such lab group is headed by a professor (the ‘guru’) and responds to a dean or head of department. In this environment, hierarchy is also pronounced within lab groups. Postdocs occupy places between professors and PhD students, acting as intermediaries, or perhaps de facto supervising PhD students (very possibly without receiving official credit for it). In this environment many individuals work on different projects. Exchange among them is not strictly necessary and remains limited–that is, even within the lab, there is no strong culture of lateral collaboration (e.g., among PhD students or among postdocs). The overall environment is competitive and, arguably, some very successful professors have organized their labs in this way.

KW - Ecosystems Research

KW - Environmental Sciences & Ecology

KW - Evolutionary Biology

KW - Genetics & Heredity

KW - Ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997207676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.010

M3 - Other (editorial matter etc.)

C2 - 27771143

AN - SCOPUS:84997207676

VL - 31

SP - 900

EP - 902

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 12

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Das entgegengesetzte Denken. Metaphysische Marginalien zu Lévinas
  2. Practical problems associated with refugee protection in western Tanzania
  3. Applicability of adapted reservoir operation for water stress mitigation under dry year conditions
  4. Consumer Preferences and Their Willingness to Pay for Local Products (by Means of Consumer Ethnocentrism)
  5. Biodegradation tests of mercaptocarboxylic acids, their esters, related divalent sulfur compounds and mercaptans
  6. Gesprächsformen
  7. Berechnung und Weiterentwicklung des Sozialindex für Hamburger Schulen
  8. BAuA-Arbeitszeitbefragung
  9. Composite hot extrusion of functional elements
  10. Wer fraß die Geburtstagstorte?
  11. Pentecostal voices and discourse perspectives to LGBTQ+ narratives in Nigeria
  12. Laypeople’s Affective Images of Energy Transition Pathways
  13. Open participation network and school health programs - Review of the BLK experiment OPUS (1997-2000) for health promotion
  14. Games People (Don’t) Play
  15. Gase auf submikroskopischer Ebene untersuchen
  16. Key competencies for sustainable consumption
  17. The Interplay Between Supply Chain Transparency and NGO Pressure
  18. RoMe
  19. Environmental impacts of droughts: key challenges.
  20. Ownership mode, cultural distance, and the extent of parent firms’ strategic control over subsidiaries in the PRC
  21. Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach' mich nicht nass!
  22. Reisen als Möglichkeit eines Anderssein-Könnens
  23. A note on firm age and the margins of imports: first evidence from Germany
  24. The defence of necessity
  25. Es wird teuer
  26. AIDA, reif für das Museum?
  27. Was kommt nach der Selbstevaluation?
  28. To the computation of the torsion shear stresses and warping shear coefficients at straight thin-walled bars
  29. Night-time noise annoyance
  30. Analysis of estrogenic activity in coastal surface waters of the Baltic Sea using the yeast estrogen screen
  31. Production of Mg-Mg2Si Composites