Maize silage digestate application affecting germination and early growth of maize modulated by soil type

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Maize silage digestate application affecting germination and early growth of maize modulated by soil type. / Robles-Aguilar, Ana A.; Temperton, Vicky M.; Jablonowski, Nicolai D.
in: Agronomy, Jahrgang 9, Nr. 8, 473, 20.08.2019.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Robles-Aguilar AA, Temperton VM, Jablonowski ND. Maize silage digestate application affecting germination and early growth of maize modulated by soil type. Agronomy. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):473. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9080473

Bibtex

@article{799170a2414846899f88ee1209806900,
title = "Maize silage digestate application affecting germination and early growth of maize modulated by soil type",
abstract = "During biogas production anaerobic digestion of plant material produces a nutrient-rich residue called digestate. The application of the nutrients present in the digestate should improve soil fertility, particularly in nutrient poor soils, and thus crop yield, promoting the closure of the nutrient cycle. This study evaluated the effect of digestate application on the germination and early stages of plant development since these are the first steps to be considered when studying the benefits on plant growth in low fertility substrates. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of three substrates of different texture and fertility (field loam, field sand, sand), as well as type and amount of fertilizer (pure maize digestate vs. inorganic nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium (NPK) fertilizer) on both germination and early plant performance of maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays). While digestate and NPK fertilizer applications had no significant effect on germination in the two field soils, digestate applications significantly decreased the germination rate in sand (36–82% reduction) due to an increase of surface water repellency. In contrast, for aboveground biomass yield, the most positive fertilization effects of digestate application were found on sand (up to 3.5 times the biomass of the unamended control) followed by field sand (1.5 times), compared to no effect for field loam. Our findings suggest that digestate application have positive fertilization effects in low-fertility substrates, similar to NPK, even though digestate application may have a negative impact on the permeability in sandy substrates that could interfere with germination.",
keywords = "Biogas-residues, Biomass, Fertilizer, Nutrients, Permeability, Soils, Ecosystems Research",
author = "Robles-Aguilar, {Ana A.} and Temperton, {Vicky M.} and Jablonowski, {Nicolai D.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 by the authors.",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
day = "20",
doi = "10.3390/agronomy9080473",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Agronomy",
issn = "2073-4395",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maize silage digestate application affecting germination and early growth of maize modulated by soil type

AU - Robles-Aguilar, Ana A.

AU - Temperton, Vicky M.

AU - Jablonowski, Nicolai D.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 by the authors.

PY - 2019/8/20

Y1 - 2019/8/20

N2 - During biogas production anaerobic digestion of plant material produces a nutrient-rich residue called digestate. The application of the nutrients present in the digestate should improve soil fertility, particularly in nutrient poor soils, and thus crop yield, promoting the closure of the nutrient cycle. This study evaluated the effect of digestate application on the germination and early stages of plant development since these are the first steps to be considered when studying the benefits on plant growth in low fertility substrates. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of three substrates of different texture and fertility (field loam, field sand, sand), as well as type and amount of fertilizer (pure maize digestate vs. inorganic nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium (NPK) fertilizer) on both germination and early plant performance of maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays). While digestate and NPK fertilizer applications had no significant effect on germination in the two field soils, digestate applications significantly decreased the germination rate in sand (36–82% reduction) due to an increase of surface water repellency. In contrast, for aboveground biomass yield, the most positive fertilization effects of digestate application were found on sand (up to 3.5 times the biomass of the unamended control) followed by field sand (1.5 times), compared to no effect for field loam. Our findings suggest that digestate application have positive fertilization effects in low-fertility substrates, similar to NPK, even though digestate application may have a negative impact on the permeability in sandy substrates that could interfere with germination.

AB - During biogas production anaerobic digestion of plant material produces a nutrient-rich residue called digestate. The application of the nutrients present in the digestate should improve soil fertility, particularly in nutrient poor soils, and thus crop yield, promoting the closure of the nutrient cycle. This study evaluated the effect of digestate application on the germination and early stages of plant development since these are the first steps to be considered when studying the benefits on plant growth in low fertility substrates. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of three substrates of different texture and fertility (field loam, field sand, sand), as well as type and amount of fertilizer (pure maize digestate vs. inorganic nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium (NPK) fertilizer) on both germination and early plant performance of maize (Zea mays L. subsp. mays). While digestate and NPK fertilizer applications had no significant effect on germination in the two field soils, digestate applications significantly decreased the germination rate in sand (36–82% reduction) due to an increase of surface water repellency. In contrast, for aboveground biomass yield, the most positive fertilization effects of digestate application were found on sand (up to 3.5 times the biomass of the unamended control) followed by field sand (1.5 times), compared to no effect for field loam. Our findings suggest that digestate application have positive fertilization effects in low-fertility substrates, similar to NPK, even though digestate application may have a negative impact on the permeability in sandy substrates that could interfere with germination.

KW - Biogas-residues

KW - Biomass

KW - Fertilizer

KW - Nutrients

KW - Permeability

KW - Soils

KW - Ecosystems Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071116925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/agronomy9080473

DO - 10.3390/agronomy9080473

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:85071116925

VL - 9

JO - Agronomy

JF - Agronomy

SN - 2073-4395

IS - 8

M1 - 473

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Soziale Kompetenzen von Fußballtrainern
  2. The granular nature of the great export collapse in German manufacturing industries, 2008/2009
  3. Collective Litigation in German Civil Procedure
  4. Die demografische Entwicklung
  5. Enrichment of mutated K-RAS from human stool DNA by a combined magnetic capture hybridization and PCR-RFLP assay.
  6. Magischer Sand
  7. "Integration" als kontextgebundenes Konzept - ein deutsch-britisch-niederländischer Vergleich
  8. Siegeszug des Computers
  9. Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung und Präventionsmanagement
  10. Friction-Induced Vibrations during Tightening of Bolted Joints—Analytical and Experimental Results
  11. Informed consent
  12. Post-sozialistische Regierungssystemreform
  13. Distanz und Leidenschaft
  14. Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Environmental Management Accounting
  15. The Sound Culture of Dubstep in London
  16. Gehirn und Züchtung
  17. Regenerativer Überschussstrom für Power-to-Heat
  18. Community marketing in social media
  19. Kolonialismus und Modernekritik
  20. Inspektionsbasierte Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung
  21. Der Einfluss von Zwischenhölzern auf das Biegedrillknickverhalten zweiteiliger Brettschichtholzträger
  22. Kwame Gyekye’s Critical Dialogue with Kant’s Ethics and its Political Consequences
  23. Hochschulbilung in Zeiten der Bolognareform
  24. Die Entwicklung des deutschen Umweltrechts seit 1945
  25. Zwischen ‘Ruhe’ und ‘Unberührtheit’: Landschaftsbilder am Wattenmeer im internationalen Vergleich in Walsh
  26. Hilmer, Brigitte:: Scheinen des Begriffs: Hegels Logik der Kunst
  27. Entwicklung und Implementierung eines Führungskräftefeedbacks in einem ausländischen Tochterunternehmen als Pilotprojekt mit dem Ziel der Übertragung auf andere Unternehmensbereiche
  28. The Gentle Art of Reinsurance Broking
  29. Geschlecht III
  30. Der Kohlenstoffkreislauf im Klimawandel
  31. Family businesses and non-family equity
  32. Spielen für den guten Zweck
  33. Nachfrage nach Gesundheitsleistungen
  34. Mathematische Kompetenz im Ländervergleich
  35. The Role of Sustainable Entrepreneurship in Sustainability Transitions
  36. Schriftspracherwerb zwischen Norm- und Strukturorientierung
  37. Sorgefall Familienrecht
  38. Die Tagesschau, zur Geschichte einer Nachrichtensendung, Nea Matzen; Christian Radler (Hg.)
  39. Philosophy of Religion and Fundamental Theology
  40. Kann man Verantwortung lernen ?
  41. Art. 229 a EGV (Entscheidung über gewerblichen Rechtsschutz) (Nizza-Fassung)
  42. Vom Rand ins Zentrum