How General is Trust in "Most People" ? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Authors

Generalized trust has become a paramount topic throughout the social sciences, in its own right and as the key civic component of social capital. To date, cross-national research relies on the standard question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people?" Yet the radius problem-that is, how wide a circle of others respondents imagine as "most people"-makes comparisons between individuals and countries problematic. Until now, much about the radius problem has been speculation, but data for 51 countries from the latest World Values Survey make it possible to estimate how wide the trust radius actually is. We do this by relating responses to the standard trust question to a new battery of items that measures in-group and out-group trust. In 41 out of 51 countries, "most people" in the standard question predominantly connotes out-groups. To this extent, it is a valid measure of general trust in others. Nevertheless, the radius of "most people" varies considerably across countries; it is substantially narrower in Confucian countries and wider in wealthy countries. Some country rankings on trust thus change dramatically when the standard question is replaced by a radius-adjusted trust score. In cross-country regressions, the radius of trust matters for civic attitudes and behaviors because the assumed civic nature of trust depends on a wide radius.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftAmerican Sociological Review
Jahrgang76
Ausgabenummer5
Seiten (von - bis)786-807
Anzahl der Seiten22
ISSN0003-1224
DOIs
PublikationsstatusErschienen - 01.10.2011

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Forschende

  1. Lisa Hofmann

Publikationen

  1. Fun is a Battlefield
  2. Julius Meier-Graefe -" a laconic art historian"
  3. Employees as a Second Audience
  4. Qualität der Internen Markenführung
  5. Der Kampf ums Recht
  6. Article 76 CISG
  7. Reprint of
  8. Sense, seize, reconfigure
  9. Memory, Contradictions and Resignification of Colonial Imagery in “My Heart of Darkness”
  10. Ereignis
  11. Article 74 CISG
  12. Beyond Markets
  13. Was ist Kritik im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung?
  14. Validität des NEPS-Mathematiktests für die neunte Klasse
  15. Embedding higher education into a Real-World Lab
  16. Sustainablity Communication - An Introduction
  17. One for all, all for one
  18. Trace Metal Dynamics in Floodplain Soils of the River Elbe: A Review (vol 38, pg 1349)
  19. Parteiensysteme in jungen Demokratien der Dritten Welt
  20. Do Time Poor Individuals Pay More?
  21. Personalakte inkl. Datenschutz, Datenschutzbeauftragter
  22. Zukünftige Generationen in der heutigen Demokratie
  23. A Global Phenomenon with a Unique Pinoy Twist - Das Vinyl Revival in Metro Manila
  24. Personaltheorie als Beitrag zur Theorie der Unternehmung
  25. Worte zu Landschaft
  26. Die Drittintervention in Beschwerdeverfahren vor dem EGMR
  27. Magnesium alloy containing silver for degradable biomedical implants
  28. Legal and Regulatory Content for Small Satellites
  29. States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics
  30. Recht auf Ineffizienz
  31. Handelsgesetzbuch
  32. Mixed Methods and Mixed Theories –
  33. Über Mathematik reden
  34. Kronzeuge ohne Krone?
  35. Soil and plant nitrogen pools as related to plant diversity in an experimental grassland
  36. Handball-Brennball
  37. Grenzüberschreitung: Verfassungsentwicklung und Internationalisierung
  38. Von Ausschluss zu Ausschluss
  39. Investigating and teaching pragmatics
  40. Ausgewählte Kapitel der Theoretischen Informatik
  41. Wertwissen
  42. Unternehmerische Desillusionierung nach einer Existenzgründung
  43. Gender als didaktisches Prinzip