Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services. / Riechers, Maraja; Noack, Eva Maria; Tscharntke, Teja.
in: Urban Ecosystems, Jahrgang 20, Nr. 3, 01.06.2017, S. 715-727.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Riechers M, Noack EM, Tscharntke T. Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems. 2017 Jun 1;20(3):715-727. doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3

Bibtex

@article{30e54707e949458eb24a93b6453c8835,
title = "Experts{\textquoteright} versus laypersons{\textquoteright} perception of urban cultural ecosystem services",
abstract = "Urban cultural ecosystem services are understood differently by experts and laypersons. Yet, unaccounted differences can lead to management problems for urban green spaces, as experts may recommend practices that do not meet the laypersons{\textquoteright} wishes. Qualitative research on the perception of cultural ecosystem services can be one tool to analyze these differences. We use expert and problem-centered interviews to assess differences in cultural ecosystem service perceptions for experts and laypersons in Berlin. Using an innovative approach, we combine inductive qualitative content analysis with a frequency analysis and multidimensional scaling. This explorative study innovatively merges qualitative and quantitative approaches to show new ways of analysis. Our results show that the experts{\textquoteright} perceptions of nature appear to be more practical, management-centered, whereas laypersons appear to prioritize enjoyment of nature. Overall, multidimensional scaling indicates different perceptions and conceptualizations of cultural ecosystem service bundles, emphasizing the diverging understandings. If these different perceptions are not accounted for it could lead to social and political contrast. They should therefore be acknowledged in decision-making and goal formulation for the management of urban green.",
keywords = "Bundles of services, Management of urban green, Millennium ecosystem assessment, Political conflict, Public participation, Qualitative research, Transdisciplinary studies",
author = "Maraja Riechers and Noack, {Eva Maria} and Teja Tscharntke",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "715--727",
journal = "Urban Ecosystems",
issn = "1083-8155",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services

AU - Riechers, Maraja

AU - Noack, Eva Maria

AU - Tscharntke, Teja

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Urban cultural ecosystem services are understood differently by experts and laypersons. Yet, unaccounted differences can lead to management problems for urban green spaces, as experts may recommend practices that do not meet the laypersons’ wishes. Qualitative research on the perception of cultural ecosystem services can be one tool to analyze these differences. We use expert and problem-centered interviews to assess differences in cultural ecosystem service perceptions for experts and laypersons in Berlin. Using an innovative approach, we combine inductive qualitative content analysis with a frequency analysis and multidimensional scaling. This explorative study innovatively merges qualitative and quantitative approaches to show new ways of analysis. Our results show that the experts’ perceptions of nature appear to be more practical, management-centered, whereas laypersons appear to prioritize enjoyment of nature. Overall, multidimensional scaling indicates different perceptions and conceptualizations of cultural ecosystem service bundles, emphasizing the diverging understandings. If these different perceptions are not accounted for it could lead to social and political contrast. They should therefore be acknowledged in decision-making and goal formulation for the management of urban green.

AB - Urban cultural ecosystem services are understood differently by experts and laypersons. Yet, unaccounted differences can lead to management problems for urban green spaces, as experts may recommend practices that do not meet the laypersons’ wishes. Qualitative research on the perception of cultural ecosystem services can be one tool to analyze these differences. We use expert and problem-centered interviews to assess differences in cultural ecosystem service perceptions for experts and laypersons in Berlin. Using an innovative approach, we combine inductive qualitative content analysis with a frequency analysis and multidimensional scaling. This explorative study innovatively merges qualitative and quantitative approaches to show new ways of analysis. Our results show that the experts’ perceptions of nature appear to be more practical, management-centered, whereas laypersons appear to prioritize enjoyment of nature. Overall, multidimensional scaling indicates different perceptions and conceptualizations of cultural ecosystem service bundles, emphasizing the diverging understandings. If these different perceptions are not accounted for it could lead to social and political contrast. They should therefore be acknowledged in decision-making and goal formulation for the management of urban green.

KW - Bundles of services

KW - Management of urban green

KW - Millennium ecosystem assessment

KW - Political conflict

KW - Public participation

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Transdisciplinary studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996566952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3

DO - 10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3

M3 - Journal articles

AN - SCOPUS:84996566952

VL - 20

SP - 715

EP - 727

JO - Urban Ecosystems

JF - Urban Ecosystems

SN - 1083-8155

IS - 3

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. Ob man etwas tun kann oder nicht, ist eine rein mechanische oder materielle Frage
  2. Cycling anger of regular cyclists and professional bicycle messengers in Germany
  3. Normalitäten in der Sozialen Arbeit und pädagogische Praxen der In- und Exklusion
  4. Konzepte der Nutzenerfassung in Managemententwicklung und Corporate Universities
  5. Globalisierung, Clash of Civilizations und interkulturelle Wirtschaftspsychologie
  6. Digitalisierung und Arbeitsorganisation: Narrative, Praxis und Gestaltungsoptionen
  7. Risky driving behavior of novice and young drivers in different affective states
  8. Handbuch liturgische Präsenz, Bd. 1, Zur praktischen Inszenierung des Gottesdienstes
  9. The structure of contributing factors of human error in safety-critical industries
  10. Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes?
  11. Perspektiven der Teilwertabschreibung bei voraussichtlich dauernder Wertminderung
  12. Do TCFD-aligned firms really care for climate change, or solely for their investors?
  13. Zivilrechtliche Haftungsrisiken bei der Zusammenarbeit von Schule und Jugendhilfe
  14. Landscape models for use in studies of landscape change and habitat fragmentation
  15. Beschwerdemanagement in stationären Wohngruppen zwischen Partizipation und Schutz
  16. Inversion of fuzzy neural networks for the reduction of noise in the control loop
  17. Toward landscape-wide conservation outcomes in Australia's temperate grazing region
  18. Modellierung und Implementierung eines Order2Cash-Prozesses in verteilten Systemen
  19. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression on suicidality and hopelessness
  20. "j'ai écrit ma vie". Die autobiographischen Legitimierungsstrategien Gustave Courbets
  21. "Wir wissen nicht, was wir tun sollen" - Expertisierte Raumaneignung und -konstruktion
  22. Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Studierenden? Ergebnisse aus dem COVID-HL Netzwerk
  23. Step on it! How Positive Affective States Influence Young Drivers’ Driving Behaviors
  24. Research-based coaching of academic staff as means to improve Engineering Education
  25. Social justice for traditional knowledge holders will help conserve Europe's nature
  26. Globalising the Study of Diffusion: Multiple Sources and the East African Community
  27. Unraveling Privacy Concerns in Complex Data Ecosystems with Architectural Thinking
  28. Arable vegetation of calcareous soils (Caucalidion) Plant community of the year 2022
  29. Kritik und Widerstand aus politiktheoretischer und politikdidaktischer Perspektive.
  30. A conceptual cross-disciplinary model of organizational practices for older workers
  31. Potential impact of climate change effects on preferences for tourism destinations
  32. Pandemische politische Ökonomie: Zur kapitalistischen Verarbeitung der Corona-Krise
  33. Trust in scientists, risk perception, conspiratorial beliefs, and unrealistic optimism