Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Standard

Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior. / Genschow, Oliver; Rigoni, Davide; Brass, Marcel.
in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), Jahrgang 114, Nr. 38, 19.09.2017, S. 10071-10076.

Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{41405a3edb22444da4454339ffc8e275,
title = "Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others{\textquoteright} behavior",
abstract = "Free will is a cornerstone of our society, and psychological research demonstrates that questioning its existence impacts social behavior. In six studies, we tested whether believing in free will is related to the correspondence bias, which reflects people{\textquoteright}s automatic tendency to overestimate the influence of internal as compared to external factors when interpreting others{\textquoteright} behavior. All studies demonstrate a positive relationship between the strength of the belief in free will and the correspondence bias. Moreover, in two experimental studies, we showed that weakening participants{\textquoteright} belief in free will leads to a reduction of the correspondence bias. Finally, the last study demonstrates that believing in free will predicts prescribed punishment and reward behavior, and that this relation is mediated by the correspondence bias. Overall, these studies show that believing in free will impacts fundamental social-cognitive processes that are involved in the understanding of others{\textquoteright} behavior.",
keywords = "Correspondence bias, Free-will belief, Interpersonal perception, Business psychology",
author = "Oliver Genschow and Davide Rigoni and Marcel Brass",
note = "Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant PZ00P1_168007). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1701916114",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "10071--10076",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "38",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior

AU - Genschow, Oliver

AU - Rigoni, Davide

AU - Brass, Marcel

N1 - Funding Information: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant PZ00P1_168007). Publisher Copyright: © 2017, National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/9/19

Y1 - 2017/9/19

N2 - Free will is a cornerstone of our society, and psychological research demonstrates that questioning its existence impacts social behavior. In six studies, we tested whether believing in free will is related to the correspondence bias, which reflects people’s automatic tendency to overestimate the influence of internal as compared to external factors when interpreting others’ behavior. All studies demonstrate a positive relationship between the strength of the belief in free will and the correspondence bias. Moreover, in two experimental studies, we showed that weakening participants’ belief in free will leads to a reduction of the correspondence bias. Finally, the last study demonstrates that believing in free will predicts prescribed punishment and reward behavior, and that this relation is mediated by the correspondence bias. Overall, these studies show that believing in free will impacts fundamental social-cognitive processes that are involved in the understanding of others’ behavior.

AB - Free will is a cornerstone of our society, and psychological research demonstrates that questioning its existence impacts social behavior. In six studies, we tested whether believing in free will is related to the correspondence bias, which reflects people’s automatic tendency to overestimate the influence of internal as compared to external factors when interpreting others’ behavior. All studies demonstrate a positive relationship between the strength of the belief in free will and the correspondence bias. Moreover, in two experimental studies, we showed that weakening participants’ belief in free will leads to a reduction of the correspondence bias. Finally, the last study demonstrates that believing in free will predicts prescribed punishment and reward behavior, and that this relation is mediated by the correspondence bias. Overall, these studies show that believing in free will impacts fundamental social-cognitive processes that are involved in the understanding of others’ behavior.

KW - Correspondence bias

KW - Free-will belief

KW - Interpersonal perception

KW - Business psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029562204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1701916114

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1701916114

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 28855342

AN - SCOPUS:85029562204

VL - 114

SP - 10071

EP - 10076

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 38

ER -

DOI

Zuletzt angesehen

Publikationen

  1. An EEG frequency tagging study on biological motion perception in children with DCD
  2. Outcome expectations and work design characteristics in post-retirement work planning
  3. sPlotOpen – An environmentally balanced, open-access, global dataset of vegetation plots
  4. A conceptual map of invasion biology: Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network
  5. The role of learning strategies for performance in mathematics courses for engineers
  6. Problemfelder und mögliche Lösungsansätze bei genossenschaftlichen Bürgerwindparks
  7. Lyapunov control strategy for thermoelectric cooler activating an ice-clamping system
  8. A multi input sliding mode control for Peltier Cells using a cold-hot sliding surface
  9. Competitive interactions shape plant responses to nitrogen fertilization and drought
  10. Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept
  11. Opening Universities for Lifelong Learning and the Challenge of Diversity Management
  12. Efficacy an online Recreation training for employees affected by symptoms of insomnia
  13. Unternehmerische Nachhaltigkeit als Treiber von Unternehmenserfolg und Strukturwandel
  14. Students’ genre expectations and the effects of text cohesion on reading comprehension
  15. Toward a methodical framework for comprehensively assessing forest multifunctionality
  16. Arbeitsraum für Erzieherinnen: Kindergarten, Kindertagesstätte, Kinderkrippe, Kinderladen.
  17. PoNa als inter- und transdisziplinäres Experiment in der Sozial-ökologischen Forschung
  18. Privacy is Dead – Ein Fünf-Jahres-Selbstversuch der bewussten Ortsbestimmung mittels GPS
  19. Ein psychologisches Modell unternehmerischen Erfolgs und einige empirische Ergebnisse
  20. Is peoples’ belief in a just world associated with (dis)honesty in romantic relationships?
  21. (Kooperative) Prüfung der Rechnungslegungspolitik durch Aufsichtsrat und Abschlussprüfer
  22. Tree diversity promotes predator but not omnivore ants in a subtropical Chinese forest
  23. Diversity and specificity of host-natural enemy interactions in an urban-rural interface
  24. George Bell’s relations to the German evangelical church and the problem of information
  25. Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual
  26. Arbeitgeberattraktivität aus der Perspektive unterschiedlicher Mitarbeitergenerationen
  27. Musikökonomie und Rechte: Terra incognita oder Potenzialgebiete für die Musikpädagogik?
  28. Reconciling Analytics with Holistic Thinking in Business Sustainability Decision-Making