Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task. / Westfal, Mareike; Cracco, Emiel; Crusius, Jan et al.
In: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 57, No. 2, 80, 02.2025.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Westfal M, Cracco E, Crusius J, Genschow O. Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task. Behavior Research Methods. 2025 Feb;57(2):80. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02557-3

Bibtex

@article{2ef54feea14b4d688019599b33e5733a,
title = "Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task",
abstract = "People automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. One of the most commonly used measurement methods to assess imitative behavior is the imitation-inhibition task (Brass et al., 2000). A disadvantage of its original form is, however, that it was validated for laboratory settings—a time-consuming and costly procedure. Here, we present an approach for conducting the imitation-inhibition task in online settings. We programmed the online version of the imitation-inhibition task in JavaScript and implemented the task in online survey software (i.e., Qualtrics). We validated the task in four experiments. Experiment 1 (N = 88) showed that the typical automatic imitation effects can be detected with good psychometric properties. Going one step further, Experiment 2 (N = 182) directly compared the online version of the imitation-inhibition task with its laboratory version and demonstrated that the online version produces similar strong and reliable effects. In Experiments 3 and 4, we assessed typical moderator effects that were previously reported in laboratory settings: Experiment 3 (N = 93) demonstrated that automatic imitation can be reliably detected in online settings even when controlling for spatial compatibility. Experiment 4 (N = 104) found, in line with previous research, that individuals imitate hand movements executed by a robot less strongly than movements executed by a human. Taken together, the results show that the online version of the imitation-inhibition task offers an easy-to-use method that enables the measurement of automatic imitation with common online survey software tools in a reliable and valid fashion.",
keywords = "Automatic imitation, Imitation-inhibition task, Online research, Survey software, Psychology, Management studies",
author = "Mareike Westfal and Emiel Cracco and Jan Crusius and Oliver Genschow",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2025.",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
doi = "10.3758/s13428-024-02557-3",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
journal = "Behavior Research Methods",
issn = "1554-351X",
publisher = "Springer Nature AG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of an online imitation-inhibition task

AU - Westfal, Mareike

AU - Cracco, Emiel

AU - Crusius, Jan

AU - Genschow, Oliver

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - People automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. One of the most commonly used measurement methods to assess imitative behavior is the imitation-inhibition task (Brass et al., 2000). A disadvantage of its original form is, however, that it was validated for laboratory settings—a time-consuming and costly procedure. Here, we present an approach for conducting the imitation-inhibition task in online settings. We programmed the online version of the imitation-inhibition task in JavaScript and implemented the task in online survey software (i.e., Qualtrics). We validated the task in four experiments. Experiment 1 (N = 88) showed that the typical automatic imitation effects can be detected with good psychometric properties. Going one step further, Experiment 2 (N = 182) directly compared the online version of the imitation-inhibition task with its laboratory version and demonstrated that the online version produces similar strong and reliable effects. In Experiments 3 and 4, we assessed typical moderator effects that were previously reported in laboratory settings: Experiment 3 (N = 93) demonstrated that automatic imitation can be reliably detected in online settings even when controlling for spatial compatibility. Experiment 4 (N = 104) found, in line with previous research, that individuals imitate hand movements executed by a robot less strongly than movements executed by a human. Taken together, the results show that the online version of the imitation-inhibition task offers an easy-to-use method that enables the measurement of automatic imitation with common online survey software tools in a reliable and valid fashion.

AB - People automatically imitate a wide range of different behaviors. One of the most commonly used measurement methods to assess imitative behavior is the imitation-inhibition task (Brass et al., 2000). A disadvantage of its original form is, however, that it was validated for laboratory settings—a time-consuming and costly procedure. Here, we present an approach for conducting the imitation-inhibition task in online settings. We programmed the online version of the imitation-inhibition task in JavaScript and implemented the task in online survey software (i.e., Qualtrics). We validated the task in four experiments. Experiment 1 (N = 88) showed that the typical automatic imitation effects can be detected with good psychometric properties. Going one step further, Experiment 2 (N = 182) directly compared the online version of the imitation-inhibition task with its laboratory version and demonstrated that the online version produces similar strong and reliable effects. In Experiments 3 and 4, we assessed typical moderator effects that were previously reported in laboratory settings: Experiment 3 (N = 93) demonstrated that automatic imitation can be reliably detected in online settings even when controlling for spatial compatibility. Experiment 4 (N = 104) found, in line with previous research, that individuals imitate hand movements executed by a robot less strongly than movements executed by a human. Taken together, the results show that the online version of the imitation-inhibition task offers an easy-to-use method that enables the measurement of automatic imitation with common online survey software tools in a reliable and valid fashion.

KW - Automatic imitation

KW - Imitation-inhibition task

KW - Online research

KW - Survey software

KW - Psychology

KW - Management studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217357163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-024-02557-3

DO - 10.3758/s13428-024-02557-3

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 39884989

AN - SCOPUS:85217357163

VL - 57

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-351X

IS - 2

M1 - 80

ER -