The Framework for Inclusive Science Education

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Standard

The Framework for Inclusive Science Education. / Brauns, Sarah; Abels, Simone.
Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, 2020. (Inclusive Science Education; No. 1/2020).

Research output: Working paperWorking papers

Harvard

Brauns, S & Abels, S 2020 'The Framework for Inclusive Science Education' Inclusive Science Education, no. 1/2020, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg.

APA

Brauns, S., & Abels, S. (2020). The Framework for Inclusive Science Education. (Inclusive Science Education; No. 1/2020). Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.

Vancouver

Brauns S, Abels S. The Framework for Inclusive Science Education. Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. 2020 Oct 10. (Inclusive Science Education; 1/2020).

Bibtex

@techreport{541e99da40ad4e17a21ba3da80257bc1,
title = "The Framework for Inclusive Science Education",
abstract = "In this working paper, we introduce the Framework for Inclusive Science Education. For the data collection, we applied a systematic literature review. In the process, n=297 titles were generated, which empirically or theoretically address the issue of inclusive science education. The sample was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. In a qualitative analysis, categories that combine characteristics of science education with an inclusive implementation were inductively derived. In total, n=935 categories on different abstraction levels were derived, which represent the framework. N=16 main categories were identified, which display the characteristics of science education to be combined with inclusive pedagogies. For the quantitative analysis of the sample and the framework, descriptive statistics were performed and differences between sub-samples analysed. Over the last ten years, a significant increase in publications has been observed. Moreover, there is a minor representation in titles relating to pre- and in-service teachers working in inclusive science education. Overall, in this paper we present not only the framework itself, but also give recommendations for the application of the framework.",
keywords = "Didactics of sciences education, Educational science",
author = "Sarah Brauns and Simone Abels",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "10",
language = "English",
series = "Inclusive Science Education",
publisher = "Leuphana Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",
number = "1/2020",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Leuphana Universit{\"a}t L{\"u}neburg",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Framework for Inclusive Science Education

AU - Brauns, Sarah

AU - Abels, Simone

PY - 2020/10/10

Y1 - 2020/10/10

N2 - In this working paper, we introduce the Framework for Inclusive Science Education. For the data collection, we applied a systematic literature review. In the process, n=297 titles were generated, which empirically or theoretically address the issue of inclusive science education. The sample was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. In a qualitative analysis, categories that combine characteristics of science education with an inclusive implementation were inductively derived. In total, n=935 categories on different abstraction levels were derived, which represent the framework. N=16 main categories were identified, which display the characteristics of science education to be combined with inclusive pedagogies. For the quantitative analysis of the sample and the framework, descriptive statistics were performed and differences between sub-samples analysed. Over the last ten years, a significant increase in publications has been observed. Moreover, there is a minor representation in titles relating to pre- and in-service teachers working in inclusive science education. Overall, in this paper we present not only the framework itself, but also give recommendations for the application of the framework.

AB - In this working paper, we introduce the Framework for Inclusive Science Education. For the data collection, we applied a systematic literature review. In the process, n=297 titles were generated, which empirically or theoretically address the issue of inclusive science education. The sample was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. In a qualitative analysis, categories that combine characteristics of science education with an inclusive implementation were inductively derived. In total, n=935 categories on different abstraction levels were derived, which represent the framework. N=16 main categories were identified, which display the characteristics of science education to be combined with inclusive pedagogies. For the quantitative analysis of the sample and the framework, descriptive statistics were performed and differences between sub-samples analysed. Over the last ten years, a significant increase in publications has been observed. Moreover, there is a minor representation in titles relating to pre- and in-service teachers working in inclusive science education. Overall, in this paper we present not only the framework itself, but also give recommendations for the application of the framework.

KW - Didactics of sciences education

KW - Educational science

UR - http://www.leuphana.de/inclusive-science-education

UR - https://www.leuphana.de/institute/insc/didaktik-der-naturwissenschaften/publikationen/inclusive-science-education/the-framework-for-inclusive-science-education-working-paper-01-2020.html

M3 - Working papers

T3 - Inclusive Science Education

BT - The Framework for Inclusive Science Education

PB - Leuphana Universität Lüneburg

CY - Lüneburg

ER -

Documents

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Förderung erneuerbarer Energien und Emissionshandel
  2. Energie- und Klimaschutzpolitik: USA holen langsam auf
  3. Frauenberufstätigkeit im Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
  4. Innovation in a Computable General Equilibrium Model
  5. Visueller Aktivismus und affektive Öffentlichkeiten
  6. Institutional Perspectives on Digital Transformation
  7. Können wir es uns leisten, nachhaltig zu wirtschaften?
  8. Kompetenzen impliziter Nachhaltigkeitsmanager stärken
  9. Gute Aufgaben im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule
  10. Environmental Accounting and the Management Challenge
  11. Jackson networks in nonautonomous random environments
  12. Unraveling the Complexity of U.S. Presidential Approval
  13. Walter Benjamin: a New Positive Concept of Destruction
  14. The Russian Energy Sector 1990-2005 and Climate Policy
  15. Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als kontroverses Diskursfeld
  16. Mehr Wettbewerb im Handwerk durch die Handwerksreform?
  17. Motive und Eigenschaften von Unternehmensgründer(inne)n
  18. Processing of CSR communication: insights from the ELM
  19. Wendy Hui Kyong Chun in Conversation with Adeline Koh
  20. Zur Aktualität der Rhythmusbewegung im 21. Jahrhundert
  21. Impact and Importance of Heterocyclics in Remediation
  22. Warum, wozu und welche Werte in der politischen Bildung?
  23. Comment on “fluorotechnology is critical to modern life
  24. Messung und Steuerung unternehmerischer Nachhaltigkeit
  25. Bäuerliche Lebenswelt, Kommunikation und Nachhaltigkeit
  26. Interoperability of mineral sustainability initiatives
  27. Encouraging environmentally sustainable holiday travel
  28. Rückbau und Entsorgung in der deutschen Atomwirtschaft
  29. Klimawandel kostet deutsche Volkswirtschaft Milliarden
  30. Energiewende forcieren statt unsinnige Pipelines bauen
  31. Die wirtschaftlichen Chancen einer klugen Energiewende
  32. Internal reference price response across store formats
  33. Environmental side effects of pharmaceutical cocktails
  34. Konvivialismus als Kunst und Komplexität als Erfahrung
  35. Die Beziehung zwischen CSR und Corporate Sustainability
  36. Sustainable Supply Chain Management im globalen Kontext
  37. Die Beziehung zwischen CSR und Corporate Sustainability
  38. Erosion modelling designed for water quality simulation
  39. Ambiguous Effects of Risk Aversion on Healthy Nutrition