The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. / Mertens, Stephanie; Herberz, Mario; Hahnel, Ulf J.J. et al.
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 119, No. 1, e2107346118, 04.01.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{29b0171e0e8e46d4a76cf639aff3b268,
title = "The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains",
abstract = "Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen{\textquoteright}s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.",
keywords = "Behavior change, Behavioral insights, Choice architecture, Meta-analysis, Nudge, Psychology",
author = "Stephanie Mertens and Mario Herberz and Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.} and Tobias Brosch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.2107346118",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of nudging

T2 - A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains

AU - Mertens, Stephanie

AU - Herberz, Mario

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

AU - Brosch, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/1/4

Y1 - 2022/1/4

N2 - Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.

AB - Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.

KW - Behavior change

KW - Behavioral insights

KW - Choice architecture

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Nudge

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122695533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2107346118

DO - 10.1073/pnas.2107346118

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34983836

AN - SCOPUS:85122695533

VL - 119

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 1

M1 - e2107346118

ER -

DOI