The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Standard

The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. / Mertens, Stephanie; Herberz, Mario; Hahnel, Ulf J.J. et al.
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 119, No. 1, e2107346118, 04.01.2022.

Research output: Journal contributionsJournal articlesResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{29b0171e0e8e46d4a76cf639aff3b268,
title = "The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains",
abstract = "Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen{\textquoteright}s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.",
keywords = "Behavior change, Behavioral insights, Choice architecture, Meta-analysis, Nudge, Psychology",
author = "Stephanie Mertens and Mario Herberz and Hahnel, {Ulf J.J.} and Tobias Brosch",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.2107346118",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effectiveness of nudging

T2 - A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains

AU - Mertens, Stephanie

AU - Herberz, Mario

AU - Hahnel, Ulf J.J.

AU - Brosch, Tobias

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/1/4

Y1 - 2022/1/4

N2 - Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.

AB - Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or so-called nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.

KW - Behavior change

KW - Behavioral insights

KW - Choice architecture

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Nudge

KW - Psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122695533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.2107346118

DO - 10.1073/pnas.2107346118

M3 - Journal articles

C2 - 34983836

AN - SCOPUS:85122695533

VL - 119

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 1

M1 - e2107346118

ER -

DOI

Recently viewed

Publications

  1. Dynamische Mathematik
  2. Regulation of morally responsible agents with motivation crowding
  3. Mythen der Edda in der deutschen Dichtung
  4. Current Trends in Environmental Cost Accounting - and its Interaction with Eco-Efficiency Performance Measurement and Indicators
  5. Digitalization in engineering education research and practice
  6. Das Wissen des Profils
  7. Exploring complex phenomena with qualitative research methods
  8. Relational Competence, Social Status, and Humor: Evidence from Two Experiments
  9. Transparency and Representation of the Public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration
  10. Consumerist lifestyles in the context of globalization
  11. Formative assessment in mathematics
  12. Comparison of different FEM code approaches in the simulation of the die deflection during aluminium extrusion
  13. Mining User-Generated Financial Content to Predict Stock Price Movements
  14. Are survey expectations theory-consistent?
  15. When to sample in an inaccessible landscape
  16. Interactive priming effect of labile carbon and crop residues on SOM depends on residue decomposition stage
  17. A Community-Based Toolkit for Designing Ride-Sharing Services
  18. Future Challenges for Global Tourism
  19. ‘Void’ democrats? The populist notion of ‘democracy’ in action
  20. Differenz und Alterität im Ritual
  21. Understanding complex links between fluvial ecosystems and social indicators in Spain
  22. How to determine the pion cloud of the constituent quark
  23. A Fictional Risk Narrative and Its Potential for Social Resonance: Reception of Barbara Kingsolver’s Flight Behavior in Reviews and Reading Groups
  24. The Social Case as a Business Case
  25. Dynamics of species diversity and composition of herbaceous vegetation in fenced and unfenced plots
  26. Anisotropic wavelet bases and thresholding
  27. An Empirical Note on Religiosity and Social Trust using German Survey Data
  28. Quantitative determination on hot tearing in Mg-Al binary alloys
  29. Facilitating age diversity in organizations – Part II
  30. Using Geodesign as a boundary management process for planning nature-based solutions in river landscapes
  31. Multibody simulations of distributed flight arrays for Industry 4.0 applications
  32. Environmental rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements in Colombian households
  33. Do better pre-migration skills accelerate immigrants’ wage assimilation?